Temperature Influence on Chemical Reaction Rates and Gas Formation

Authors

  • Dian Wardana Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan 20221, Indonesia
  • Dwi Sapri Ramadhan Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan 20221, Indonesia
  • Jaman Fahmi Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan 20221, Indonesia
  • Wulan Dwi Safitri Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan 20221, Indonesia
  • Ida Cathy Everyanti Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan 20221, Indonesia
  • Sarina Septiani Silalahi Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan 20221, Indonesia
  • Moondra Zubir Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan 20221, Indonesia
  • Nurdin Siregar Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan 20221, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24114/ijcst.v8i2.70584

Keywords:

Reaction rate, Temperature effect, Gas formation, Viscocity, Chemical mixtures

Abstract

Reaction rate is fundamentally defined as the change in the concentration of reactants or products perunit time, and is known to be influenced by several determinants, including surface area, temperature,catalysts, and reactant molarity or concentration. The present study specifically investigates the validityof the widely accepted principle that temperature plays a significant role in modulating reaction rates.Experimental variations were introduced, both in terms of temperature levels and the types of chemicalmixtures employed. The findings confirm that temperature indeed accelerates gas generation across alltested reaction systems. However, in mixtures exhibiting higher viscosity, gas formation proceeds moreslowly due to reduced molecular mobility. Consequently, in the softener–baking soda system, the onsetand progression of gas evolution show noticeable differences compared to less viscous mixtures.

References

1. He S, Mu H (2023) Microenvironmental pH Modification in Buccal/Sublingual Dosage Forms for Systemic Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutics 15, 637.

2. Almotairy A, Almutairi M, Althobaiti A, Alyahya M, Sarabu S, Alzahrani A, Zhang F, Bandari S, Repka MA (2021) Effect of pH modifiers on the solubility, dissolution rate, and stability of telmisartan solid dispersions produced by hot-melt extrusion technology. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 65, 102674.

3. Lambros M, Tran T (Henry), Fei Q, Nicolaou M (2022) Citric Acid: A Multifunctional Pharmaceutical Excipient. Pharmaceutics 14, 972.

4. He S, Mu H (2023) Microenvironmental pH Modification in Buccal/Sublingual Dosage Forms for Systemic Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutics 15, 637.

5. Mercado SAS, Galvis DGV (2023) Paracetamol ecotoxicological bioassay using the bioindicators Lens culinaris Med. and Pisum sativum L. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30, 61965–61976.

6. Chronowska M, Dressman J (2024) An In Vitro Model for Release of Acetaminophen When an Overdose is Ingested Orally. Dissolut Technol 31, 14–24.

7. He S, Østergaard J, Ashna M, Nielsen CU, Jacobsen J, Mu H (2020) Microenvironmental pH modifying films for buccal delivery of saquinavir: Effects of organic acids on pH and drug release in vitro. Int J Pharm 585, 119567.

8. Miotke-Wasilczyk M, Józefowicz M, Strankowska J, Kwela J (2021) The Role of Hydrogen Bonding in Paracetamol–Solvent and Paracetamol–Hydrogel Matrix Interactions. Materials 14, 1842.

9. Muzioł TM, Bronikowska E (2024) Driving Forces in the Formation of Paracetamol Cocrystals and Solvate with Naphthalene, Quinoline and Acridine. Molecules 29, 4437.

10. Mahmoud AAK, Regdon G, Kristó K (2025) Cutting-Edge Approaches in the Co-Amorphization Process. Pharmaceutics 17, 850.

11. Salehi N, Kuminek G, Al-Gousous J, Sperry DC, Greenwood DE, Waltz NM, Amidon GL, Ziff RM, Amidon GE (2021) Improving Dissolution Behavior and Oral Absorption of Drugs with pH-Dependent Solubility Using pH Modifiers: A Physiologically Realistic Mass Transport Analysis. Mol Pharm 18, 3326–3341.

12. He S, Østergaard J, Ashna M, Nielsen CU, Jacobsen J, Mu H (2020) Microenvironmental pH modifying films for buccal delivery of saquinavir: Effects of organic acids on pH and drug release in vitro. Int J Pharm 585, 119567.

13. Liu J, Grohganz H, Löbmann K, Rades T, Hempel N-J (2021) Co-Amorphous Drug Formulations in Numbers: Recent Advances in Co-Amorphous Drug Formulations with Focus on Co-Formability, Molar Ratio, Preparation Methods, Physical Stability, In Vitro and In Vivo Performance, and New Formulation Strategies. Pharmaceutics 13, 389.

14. Tarawneh OA, Madi AM, Hamed R, Qirem R, Qerem W, Alhusban A, Sunoqrot S, Mahmoud N, Ata S, Alsheikh I (2019) In vitro Characterization and Evaluation of Commercialized Paracetamol Products in Jordan. Dissolut Technol 26, 36–44.

15. Muzioł TM, Bronikowska E (2024) Driving Forces in the Formation of Paracetamol Cocrystals and Solvate with Naphthalene, Quinoline and Acridine. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29184437

16. Anilkumar Shinde, Namdeo Jadhav, Ojas Shinde, Pravin Patil (2019) Enhancement Solubility And Dissolution Rate Of Paracetamol And Ibuprofen By Coamorphous Particles Using Microwave Technique. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research 155–162.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-29

Issue

Section

Articles