The Effect of Acid Activator Type on Character Biochar from Coconut Shell as a Heterogeneous Catalyst Carrier

Authors

  • Khairun Nisa Argianti Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan 20221, Indonesia
  • Ricky Andi Syahputra Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan 20221, Indonesia
  • Lisnawaty Simatupang Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan 20221, Indonesia
  • Zuhairiah Nasution Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan 20221, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24114/ijcst.v9i1.72432

Keywords:

biochar, coconut shell, acid activation, heterogeneous catalyst, surface area

Abstract

This study examines the effect of acid activators (H₃PO₄, H₂SO₄, and HCl) on the characteristics of coconut shell biochar as a heterogeneous catalyst carrier. Biochar was produced through pyrolysis at 500°C, 2M acid activation at 60°C, and calcination at 550°C, then characterized using TGA, FTIR, XRD, and BET. Acid activation increased the surface area from 4.025 m²/g to 369.335 m²/g (HCl), 359.557 m²/g (H₃PO₄), and 324.938 m²/g (H₂SO₄). FTIR showed modification of P-O, S=O, and hydroxyl-carbonyl functional groups. The crystal structure remained amorphous with HCl producing the highest intensity. HCl gave the best results with a surface area of ​​369.335 m²/g, a micropore area of ​​631.7 m²/g, and superior thermal stability (mass loss of 0.587 mg), indicating potential as a heterogeneous catalyst carrier.

References

1. Iswara, M. A. I., Mustain, A., Mufid, M. & Prayitno, P. Literature Study Of Briquette Characteristics With Different Mixing Ratio Of Coconut Shell Charcoal And Other Biomasses. Distillate J. Separation Technol. 10, 56–69 (2024).

2. Sari, D. R. & Ariani, A. Processing Coconut Shells Into Charcoal And Liquid Smoke Using The Semi-Batch Pyrolysis Method. Distillate J. Separation Technol. 7, 367–372 (2023).

3. Abinaya, K.et al. Synthesis and characterization of carbon dots from coconut shell by optimizing the hydrothermal carbonization process. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 13, 1151–1157 (2021).

4. Ajien, A., Idris, J., Md Sofwan, N., Husen, R. & Seli, H. Coconut shell and husk biochar: A review of production and activation technology, economic, financial aspect and application. Waste Manag. Res. J. Sustain. Circ. Econ. 41, 37–51 (2023).

5. Sriatun, S., Herawati, S. & Aisyah, I. Effect of Activator Type on Activated Carbon Characters from Teak Wood and The Bleaching Test for Waste Cooking Oil. J. Chemical Engineering. Environment. 15, 79–89 (2020).

6. Toscano Miranda, N., Lopes Motta, I., Maciel Filho, R. & Wolf Maciel, M. R. Sugarcane bagasse pyrolysis: A review of operating conditions and products properties. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 149, 111394 (2021).

7. Elmouwahidi, A., Bailón-García, E., Pérez-Cadenas, A. F., Maldonado-Hódar, F. J. & Carrasco-Marín, F. Activated carbons from KOH and H 3 PO 4 -activation of olive residues and its application as supercapacitor electrodes. Electrochemistry Acta 229, 219–228 (2017).

8. Hasibuan, R. & Pardede, H. M. Effect of Temperature and Pyrolysis Time on the Characteristics of Coconut Shell Charcoal.J. Tech. We. USU 12, 46–53 (2023).

9. Saadatkhah, N.et al. Experimental methods in chemical engineering: Thermogravimetric analysis—TGA. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 98, 34–43 (2020).

10. Neme, I., Gonfa, G. & Masi, C. Activated carbon from biomass precursors using phosphoric acid: A review. Heliyon 8, e11940 (2022).

11. Chen, W., Meng, J., Han, X., Lan, Y. & Zhang, W. Past, present, and future of biochar. Biochar 1, 75–87 (2019).

12. Sahoo, S. S., Vijay, V. K., Chandra, R. & Kumar, H. Production and characterization of biochar produced from slow pyrolysis of pigeon pea stalk and bamboo. Clean. Eng. Technol. 3, 100101 (2021).

13. Sajjadi, B., Zubatiuk, T., Leszczynska, D., Leszczynski, J. & Chen, W. Y. Chemical activation of biochar for energy and environmental applications: a comprehensive review. Rev. Chem. Eng. 35, 777–815 (2019).

14. Leng, L., Huang, H., Li, H., Li, J. & Zhou, W. Biochar stability assessment methods: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 647, 210–222 (2019).

15. Cullity, B. D. & Stock, S. R. Elements of X-Ray Diffraction. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001).

16. Epp, J. X-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques for materials characterization. in Materials Characterization Using Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) Methods81–124 (Elsevier, 2016). doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-100040-3.00004-3.

17. Thommes, M.et al. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 87, 1051–1069 (2015).

18. Nguyen, T.-K.-T.et al. Phosphoric acid-activated biochar derived from sunflower seed husk: Selective antibiotic adsorption behavior and mechanism. Bioresour. Technol. 371, 128593 (2023).

19. Sakhiya, A. K., Anand, A. & Kaushal, P. Production, activation, and applications of biochar in recent times. Biochar 2, 253–285 (2020).

20. Basha, N. A., Rathinavel, T. & Sridharan, H. Activated Carbon from Coconut Shell: Synthesis and Its Commercial Applications-A Recent Review. Appl. Sci. Eng. Prog.https://doi.org/10.14416/j.asep.2022.07.001 (2022) doi:10.14416/j.asep.2022.07.001.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31