Studi Kelayakan Kualitas Butir Latihan Soal HOTS Pilihan Ganda dalam Pembelajaran Praktikum Akuntansi Lembaga Pemerintahan di SMK Wijaya Putra Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24114/jgk.v9i3.64381Keywords:
Analisis Butir Soal, HOTS, Validitas, Reliabilitas, AnatesAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan sebagai alat evaluasi kualitas materi soal latihan opsi berganda berdasarkan Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) dalam praktik akuntansi pada SMK Wijaya Putra Surabaya. Penelitian ini memakai deskripsi kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Perangkat lunak Anates versi 4.0. 15 butir soal digunakan untuk melakukan analisis soal latihan opsi berganda. Data validitas, reliabilitas, daya pembeda, tingkat kesukaran, dan efektivitas pengecoh yang dikumpulkan dari 30 siswa kelas XI-AKL-1 dan XI-AKL-2 untuk dievaluasi. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa 33,33% soal memiliki validitas tinggi, reliabilitas soal berada dalam kategori cukup (0,50), 86,66% soal memiliki tingkat kesukaran sedang, dan besar bagian pengecoh masuk dalam kategori buruk. Hasilnya, analisis ini menemukan kelemahan dan kekuatan alat asesmen untuk membuat soal yang lebih baik dan sesuai dengan standar pembelajaran.References
Agustin, R., Surani, D., Khasanah, A. N., Pratiwi, K. S., Nafizah, D., & Fajrin, R. I. M. (2023). PENGGUNAAN TES PILIHAN GANDA SEBAGAI ALAT EVALUASI DI SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA NEGERI 2 KEDAWUNG SRAGEN. PANDU: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Dan Pendidikan Umum, 1(4), 1–9.
Alammary, A., & Masoud, S. (2025). Towards Smarter Assessments: Enhancing Bloom’s Taxonomy Classification with a Bayesian-Optimized Ensemble Model Using Deep Learning and TF-IDF Features. Electronics, 14(12), 2312. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14122312
Alpusari, M. (2014). Analisis butir soal konsep dasar IPA 1 melalui penggunaan program komputer anates versi 4.0 for Windows. Primary, 3(2), 106–115.
Ansya, Y. A., Alfianita, A., & Syahkira, H. P. (2024). OPTIMIZING MATHEMATICS LEARNING IN FIFTH GRADES: THE CRITICAL ROLE OF EVALUATION IN IMPROVING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT AND CHARACTER. PROGRES PENDIDIKAN, 5(3), 302–311. https://prospek.unram.ac.id/index.php/PROSPEK/article/view/1120
Ansya, Y. A., Alfianita, A., Syahkira, H. P., & Syahrial, S. (2024). Peran Evaluasi Pembelajaran pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Indiktika : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.31851/indiktika.v6i2.15030
Baeng, B., Situmorang, R., & Winarsih, M. (2022). Contextual electronics learning module in sociology learning at senior high school. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 6(3), 509–519.
Elangovan, N., & Sundaravel, E. (2021). Method of preparing a document for survey instrument validation by experts. MethodsX, 8, 101326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101326
Fiska, J. M., Hidayati, Y., Qomaria, N., & Hadi, W. P. (2021). Analisis butir soal ulangan harian IPA menggunakan software Anates pada pendekatan teori tes klasik. Natural Science Education Research (NSER), 4(1), 65–76.
Hasan, K., & Mukhlisa, N. (2023). Evaluation Program of Independent Curriculum in Elementary School: A New Curriculum in Indonesia. Proceeding of The Progressive and Fun Education International Conference, 8(1), 61–69.
Ibrahim, I., & Muslimah, M. (2021). Tekhnik Pemeriksaan Jawaban, Pemberian Skor, Konversi Nilai dan Standar Penilaian. Jurnal Al-Qiyam, 2(1), 1–9.
Li, D., Fan, X., & Meng, L. (2024). Development and validation of a higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) scale for major students in the interior design discipline for blended learning. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 20287. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70908-3
Magdalena, I., Mahromiyati, M., & Nurkamilah, S. (2021). Analisis instrumen tes sebagai alat evaluasi pada mata pelajaran sbdp siswa kelas ii sdn duri kosambi 06 pagi. Nusantara, 3(2), 276–287.
Magzoub, M. E., Zafar, I., Munshi, F., & Shersad, F. (2025). Ten tips to harnessing generative AI for high-quality MCQS in medical education assessment. Medical Education Online, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2025.2532682
Martínez‐Borreguero, G., Naranjo‐Correa, F. L., & Nuñez, M. M. (2024). Exploring color concepts in physics education: Addressing common preconceptions among teachers‐in‐training. Color Research & Application, 49(3), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22919
Masrurah, M., Khaeruddin, K., & Bunga Dara, A. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) pada Bidang Studi Fisika.
Ngo, T. T. A., Bui, C. T., Chau, H. K. L., & Tran, N. P. N. (2024). Electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) on social networking sites (SNS): Roles of information credibility in shaping online purchase intention. Heliyon, 10(11), e32168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32168
Özdemir, A. Z., & Toker, Z. (2025). Analysis of distractors in mathematics questions and their potential to lead misconceptions. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 56, 101730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101730
Purwati, L. M., Arianty, R., Syakilah, D. M., Ridlo, S., & Susilaningsih, E. (2021). Analisis Soal Tes Pilihan Ganda Berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skill Menggunakan Aplikasi Anates Windows Versi 4.0. 9 For Windows. Jurnal Pendidikan UNIGA, 15(2), 460–473.
Puthiaparampil, T., & Rahman, M. (2021). How important is distractor efficiency for grading Best Answer Questions? BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02463-0
Rotama, A. D., Budiutomo, T. W., & Bowo, A. N. A. (2020). Analisis butir soal penilaian tengah semester mata pelajaran PPKN kelas VII di SMP Muhammadiyah 7 Yogyakarta. Academy of Education Journal, 11(01), 24–35.
Sugiyono, S. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2022). Assessment of mathematical creative thinking: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101019
Yan, Z., & Pastore, S. (2022). Are teachers literate in formative assessment? The development and validation of the Teacher Formative Assessment Literacy Scale. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 74, 101183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101183
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yobel Kriszaida Ebenheser, Sri Ayu Endang Setyoningrum, Revalina Aulia Sabrina, Vivi Pratiwi, Luqman Hakim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors published with the JGK (Jurnal Guru Kita) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
