Analisis Kesulitan Menulis Dongeng Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar Pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia

Authors

  • Evy Evy Universitas Perjuangan Tasikmalaya
  • Riga Zahara Nurani Universitas Perjuangan Tasikmalaya
  • Deni Chandra Universitas Perjuangan Tasikmalaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24114/jgk.v10.i4.77071

Keywords:

Kesulitan Menulis, Teks Dongeng, Faktor Penyebab, Literasi Dasar, Sekolah Dasar

Abstract

Keterampilan menulis merupakan fondasi literasi dasar, namun siswa kelas IV SD Negeri Cipanas masih kesulitan menyusun dongeng sesuai Kurikulum Merdeka Fase B. Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan bentuk kesulitan menulis dongeng dan menganalisis faktor penyebabnya. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif dengan subjek 13 siswa kelas IV, empat di antaranya dipilih secara purposive sampling sebagai subjek fokus, serta satu guru kelas sebagai informan. Penelitian dilaksanakan di SD Negeri Cipanas, Kabupaten Tasikmalaya, pada Maret–April 2026 melalui tahap persiapan, pelaksanaan, analisis data, dan pelaporan. Data dikumpulkan melalui tes kinerja menulis, observasi, wawancara mendalam, dan dokumentasi, lalu dianalisis dengan model interaktif melalui reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil menunjukkan rata-rata skor tes awal 52,4 (di bawah KKM) dan 69,2% siswa belum mampu menyusun alur yang utuh. Kesulitan meliputi pengembangan ide (skor rubrik 45%), alur yang tidak lengkap pada seluruh subjek fokus, serta keterbatasan kosakata dan ejaan pada 75% subjek fokus. Faktor penyebabnya adalah rasa takut salah, rendahnya minat baca, minimnya literasi keluarga, dan pembelajaran yang masih tradisional. Kesulitan tersebut berakar pada lemahnya literasi dasar, sehingga direkomendasikan penggunaan media visual dan bimbingan menulis bertahap.

Author Biographies

  • Evy Evy, Universitas Perjuangan Tasikmalaya

    Program Studi Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar

  • Riga Zahara Nurani, Universitas Perjuangan Tasikmalaya

    Program Studi Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar

  • Deni Chandra, Universitas Perjuangan Tasikmalaya

    Program Studi Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar

References

Afif, Z., Azhari, D. S., Kustati, M., & Sepriyanti, N. (2023). Penelitian ilmiah (kuantitatif) beserta paradigma, pendekatan, asumsi dasar, karakteristik, metode analisis data dan outputnya. INNOVATIVE: Journal of Social Science Research, 3(3), 682–693. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/2260

Ahmad, M., & Wilkins, S. (2025). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity, 59(2), 1461–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5

Ali, H., Nurani, R. Z., & Chandra, D. (2025). Analisis struktur naratif dalam kemampuan menulis teks narasi siswa kelas V SD. COLLASE (Creative of Learning Students Elementary Education), 8(3), 550–555. https://journal.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/collase/article/view/27261

Alves-Wold, A., Walgermo, B. R., McTigue, E., & Uppstad, P. H. (2024). The ABCs of writing motivation: A systematic review of factors emerging from K–5 students’ self-reports as influencing their motivation to write. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1396484. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1396484

Andreou, G., & Lemoni, G. (2025). Narrative skills of children with developmental language disorder: Retelling in macrostructure. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1626433. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1626433

Anggraeni, S. W., Sunendar, D., & Cahyani, I. (2025). Gender and narrative writing in elementary schools: A qualitative study supporting inclusive education. F1000Research, 14, Article 1317. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.171604.1

Annasthasya, D., Alfindoria, I., Rahayu, S., & Khair, O. I. (2025). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif: Tinjauan literatur dalam konteks pendidikan. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 3(7), 423–429. https://doi.org/10.60126/jim.v3i7.1070

Aurelia, T., Rahminawati, N., & Inten, D. N. (2022). Analisis faktor internal dan faktor eksternal yang mempengaruhi keterlambatan bicara (speech delay) anak usia 5,9 tahun. Bandung Conference Series: Early Childhood Teacher Education, 2(2), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsecte.v2i2.3504

Barwasser, A., Nobel, K., Asaro-Saddler, K., Saddler, B., & Grünke, M. (2025). The effects of a graphic organizer with storytelling intervention on writing quality and attitude towards writing of third graders with German as a second language. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 40, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00908-4

Caballero-Julia, D., Martín-Lucas, J., & Andrade-Silva, L. E. (2024). Unpacking the relationship between screen use and educational outcomes in childhood: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 215, Article 105049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105049

Febriani, E. S., Arobiah, D., Apriyani, A., Ramdhani, E., & Millah, A. S. (2023). Analisis data dalam penelitian tindakan kelas. Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa, 1(2), 140–153.

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600

Gil, M. M., Cunha, A. J., Pereira, Í. S. P., & Sylla, C. M. (2026). The use of digital tools to enhance writing in primary school through hybrid practices: A multisite qualitative study. Journal of Education, 206(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574251349731

Gillon, G., McNeill, B., Scott, A., Gath, M., Macfarlane, A., & Taleni, T. (2024). Large scale implementation of effective early literacy instruction. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1354182. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1354182

Graham, S. (2017). Self-regulated strategy development in the classroom: Part of a balanced approach to writing instruction for students with disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children. https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v35i7.6799

Heryadi, D., & Nurani, R. Z. (2024). Analisis kesalahan penggunaan huruf kapital, tanda baca titik serta koma pada teks deskripsi peserta didik kelas V SDN Sambong Permai. COLLASE (Creative of Learning Students Elementary Education), 7(5), 967–974. https://journal.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id/collase/article/view/20049

Inayat, S., & Younas, A. (2025). Choosing an analytical approach in qualitative descriptive studies. Creative Nursing, 31(4), 438–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/10784535251390542

Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė, D., & Šarūnaitė, G. (2026). Creating written stories for primary school students based on personalized mnemonics: The case of one Lithuanian school. Education Sciences, 16(1), Article 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010063

Kania, N., Kusumah, Y. S., Dahlan, J. A., Nurlaelah, E., Gürbüz, F., & Bonyah, E. (2024). Constructing and providing content validity evidence through the Aiken’s V index based on the experts’ judgments of the instrument to measure mathematical problem-solving skills. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 10(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v10i1.71032

Kim, Y.-S. G., Harris, K. R., Goldstone, R., Camping, A., & Graham, S. (2025). The science of teaching reading is incomplete without the science of writing: A randomized control trial of integrated teaching of reading and writing. Scientific Studies of Reading, 29(1), 32–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2024.2380272

Kim, Y.-S. G., & Schatschneider, C. (2017). Expanding the developmental models of writing: A direct and indirect effects model of developmental writing (DIEW). Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000129

Lam, C. T., & Parkin, J. R. (2026). An investigation of the simple view of writing with the WIAT-4. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 44(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829251386199

Li, Q., Yao, Y., & Zhu, X. (2024). The association between writing motivation and performance among primary school students: Considering the role of self-efficacy. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04298-2

Morgan, H. (2024). Using triangulation and crystallization to make qualitative studies trustworthy and rigorous. The Qualitative Report, 29(7), 1844–1856. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6071

Nasution, N. L., Salminawati, S., Salum, R. N., & Tarigan, I. W. B. (2024). Pengertian, tujuan, dan objek kajian sains. MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 11(1), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.69896/modeling.v11i1.2241

Nurgiyantoro, B. (2018). Teori pengkajian fiksi. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Özcan, S. (2026). The effect of dialogic reading interventions on narrative skills in the preschool period: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 11, Article 1817388. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1817388

Philippek, J., Kreutz, R. M., Hennes, A.-K., Schmidt, B. M., & Schabmann, A. (2024). The contributions of executive functions, transcription skills and text-specific skills to text quality in narratives. Reading and Writing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10528-5

Qadaria, L., Rambe, K. B., Khairiah, W., Pulungan, R. M. I., & Zahratunnisa, E. (2023). Analisis faktor penyebab rendahnya keterampilan menulis belajar siswa SD kelas IV. Jurnal Bintang Pendidikan Indonesia, 1(3), 97–106. https://ejurnal.stie-trianandra.ac.id/index.php/JUBPI/article/view/1675/1344

Rahmayanti, R., Andajani, K., & Anggraini, A. E. (2023). Kemampuan menulis karangan narasi siswa kelas V di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i3.5203

Romdona, S., Junista, S. S., & Gunawan, A. (2025). Teknik pengumpulan data: Observasi, wawancara dan kuesioner. JISOSEPOL: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Ekonomi dan Politik, 3(1), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.61787/taceee75

Song, Y., Yan, R., & De Pascalis, L. (2025). The effect of the home literacy environment on the development of written narrative skills in 8–11-year-old children. Education 3-13. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2025.2559695

Suralaga, F. (2025). Psikologi pendidikan: Implikasi dalam pembelajaran. Rajawali Pers.

Ulviani, M. (2025). Analisis kesulitan siswa dalam menulis cerita naratif di sekolah menengah pertama. Zenodo. org, 1(2), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17519101

Villamin, P., Lopez, V., Thapa, D. K., & Cleary, M. (2025). A worked example of qualitative descriptive design: A step-by-step guide for novice and early career researchers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 81(8), 5181–5195. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16481

Wendimu, S. G., & Gebremariam, H. T. (2024). Teacher-students collaboration: Using guided-writing instruction to assist learners with writing difficulties and low motivation to write. SAGE Open, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241258020

Wutich, A., Beresford, M., & Bernard, H. R. (2024). Sample sizes for 10 types of qualitative data analysis: An integrative review, empirical guidance, and next steps. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241296206

Xing, L., Tang, Y., Liu, Q., Chen, H., Zeng, J., & Su, J. (2025). The effects of interactive reading on young children’s narrative abilities: A meta-analytic study. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1653511. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1653511

Zhang, J., Goh, T.-T., Chen, D., Gong, Y., Yang, B., Pan, L., Song, T., Yu, S., & Li, H. (2025). A thematic-cognitive perspective for exploring the writing skills of children: A textual analysis using ENA. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1494111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1494111

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Evy, E., Nurani, R. Z., & Chandra, D. (2026). Analisis Kesulitan Menulis Dongeng Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar Pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. JGK (Jurnal Guru Kita), 10(4). https://doi.org/10.24114/jgk.v10.i4.77071