EFFECT OF SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY LEARNING MODEL TOWARDS STUDENT LEARNING RESULTS IN SMAN UNGGULAN SUKMA NIAS

Envilwan Berkat Harefa

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the learning outcomes of students taught with the Scientific Inquiry learning better than students who are taught with conventional learning. This research is a quasi-experimental study. The sample selection is done by cluster random sampling technique in two classes, where the first class is taught with the Scientific Inquiry learning and the second class with conventional learning. The instrument used consisted of learning achievement tests. The results showed that the learning outcomes of students who were taught with the Scientific Inquiry learning were better than students who were taught with conventional learning, this was evidenced by the results of the grades of students who were taught with the Scientific Inquiry learning obtained an average score of Learning Outcomes 70.07 and students who are taught with conventional learning get an average score of 64,13 Learning Outcome


Keywords


: Scientific Inquiry, Conventional, Learning Outcomes.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arends, R.I. 2012. Learning To Teach Ninth Edition. New York: The McGraw Hill Companies.

Arikunto, S. 2013. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, Suharsimi, 2009, Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, bumi aksara, Jakarta.

Costa, A.L. 1985. Developing Minds A Resource Book For Teaching Thinking. Alexandria: ASCD.

Demirbag & Gunel. 2014. Integrating Argument-Based Science Inquiry with Modal Representations: Impact On Science Achievement, Argumentation and Writing Skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice-14(1).

Deta, U.A. 2013. Pengaruh Metode Inkuiri Terbimbing Dan Proyek, Kreativitas, Serta Keterampilan Proses Sains Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia 9 (2011): 28-34.

Dhakaa, A. 2012. Biologycal Science Inquiry Model And Biology Teaching. Bookman International Journal Of Accounts, Economics & Business Management, Vol 1 No 2.

Dimyati & Mudjiono. 2009. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Djamarah & Syaiful B. 2000. Guru dan Anak Didik Dalam Interaksi Edukatif. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Djamarah, Syaiful B., Zain, A. 2010. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cita.

Hamalik, O. 2003. Kurikulum Dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Indrajit, D. 2009. Mudah dan Aktif Belajar Fisika Untuk Kelas X SMA/MA. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Joyce, B. & Weil, M. 2003. Models Of Teaching (5th Ed). New Delhi: Privite Limited.

Joyce, B., Weil, M., Calhoun, E. 2009. Models Of Teaching (Model-Model Pengajaran Edisi Kedelapan). Terjemahan oleh Achmad Fawaid dan Ateilla Mirza. 2009. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sagala, S. 2009. Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sani, R.A. 2012. Pengembangan

Laboratorium Fisika. Medan:

UNIMED PRESS.

Sanjaya, W. 2009. Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Sanjaya, Wina, 2008, Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan, Kencana, Jakarta.

Slameto, 2003, Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Sudiarto, 1989, Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar, Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.

Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian

Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D). Bandung:AlfaBet




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jiaf.v6i2.17031

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 160 times
PDF - 89 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

P-ISSN : 2461-1247     |       E-ISSN : 2477-5142

Flag Counter