THE DIFFERENCES OF STUDENTS’ LEARNING ACHIVEMENT TAUGHT SOMATIC, AUDIOTORYTORY, VISUAL, AND INTELLECTUAL (SAVI) LEARNING MODEL AND DIRECTT INSTRUCTION (DI) LEARNING MODEL ON SETS TOPICS IN VII GRADE AT SMP N 1 BINJAI ACADEMIC YEAR 2014/2015

Evridya . Rizki, Pargaulan . Siagian

Abstract


th: 0px; "> Abstract
This research is experiment. The purpose of this research was to know the differences of students’
learning achievement between SAVI class and Direct Instructional class in mathematical learning
process on sets topic at SMP Negeri 1 Binjai. The population of this research was all VII grade
students of SMP Negeri 1 Binjai which consists of 9 classes, whereas the sample consist of 2 classes,
they are VII-4 as experimental class consists of 30 students and VII-5 as control class consists of 30
students. Experimental class used SAVI, whereas control class used direct instruction learning model.
Collecting data technique of this research was pre-test that given in the end of learning process in
experimental class and control class. The type of this test is essay test. Before doing hypothesis test, it
would be done normality test and homogeneity test beforehand. From the result of those tests, sample
was taken from normal distribution and homogeneous population. From the data analysis of
experimental class by using t-test with significance level α = 0.05, it was obtained that tcalculated
(8.372) > ttable ( 1.671) then H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted.So, it can be concluded that, there is the
difference of students’ learning achievement from SAVI class between Direct Instruction class and the
improvement of students’ learning achievement in SAVI class is better than students’ learning
achievement in Direct Instruction class. On other words, SAVI learning model can improve the
students’ learning achievement in grade VII on the set topics at SMP N 1 Binjai academic years
2014/2015.
Keywords : Learning Achievement, Set Topics, SAVI Learning Model, Junior High School, Binjai,
North Sumatra

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arends, RI,. (2012), Learning to Teach, Mc Graw

Hill, New York

Arikunto, S., (2010), Prosedur Penelitian Suatu

Pendekatan Praktik, Rineka Cipta,

Jakarta.

Asmin, dan Abil Mansyur., (2012), Pengukuran

dan Penilaian Hasil beljar Dengan

Analisis Klasik an Modern, Larispa

Indonesia, Medan

Bahri Djamirah, S., (2006), Strategi Belajar

mengajar, PT. Asdi Mahasatya, Jakarta

DePorter, Bobbi dan Mike Hernack., (2011),

Quantum Learning: unleasing the

genius in you, Dell Publishing, New

York

Grouws, A. Douglas and Kristin J.Cebulla.,

(2000), Handbook of Improving Student

Achievement In Mathematics,

Interbational Academy of Education

(IAE), USA

Hamdani, (2010)., Strategi Belajar Mengajar,

CV. Pustaka Setia, Bandung

Kementrian Pendidikan dan kebudayan, 2013,

Materi Pelatihan Guru Implementasi

Kurikulum 2013, Badan Pengembangan

Sumber Daya Manusia Pendidikan dan

Kebudayaan dan Penjamin Mutu

Pendidikan, Jakarta

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan., (2013),

Buku Guru Matematika kelas VII

SMP/MTs Kurikulum 2013, Kementrian

Pendidikan dan kebudayaan, Jakarta

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan., (2013),

Buku Siswa Matematika kelas VII

SMP/MTs Kurikulum 2013, Kementrian

Pendidikan dan kebudayaan, Jakarta

Meier, Dave., (2000), The Accelerated Learning

Handbook: A Creatie Guide to

Designing and Delivering Faster, More

Effective Training Programs, Mc Graw

Hill, New York

Musfah, Jejen., (2011), Peningkatan Kompetensi

Guru melalui Pelatihan dan Sumber Belajar Teori dan praktik, Kencana ,

Jakarta:

Roestiyah, (2008), Strategi Belajar mengajar,

PT.Asdi Mahasatya, Jakarta

Sanjaya, Wina, (2010), Strategi Pembelajaran

Berorientasi Standart Proses

Pendidikan, Jakarta: Kencana

Sudjana., (2009), Metode Statistika, PT. Tarsito,

bandung

Sugiono., (2011), Statistika untuk Penelitian,

Alfabeta, Bandung

Supardi, U.S., (2013), Aplikasi Statistika dalam

Penelitian, Change Publication, Jakarta

Selatan

Trianto, (2009), Mendesain Model pembelajaran

Inovatif-Progresif, kencana Jakarta

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No.20

Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan

Nasional. Depdiknas

Unimed, (2011), Pedoman Penulisan Proposal

dan Skripsi Mahasiswa Program Studi

Pendidikan FMIPA Unimed, FMIPA,

Medan




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpmi.v1i1.8914

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 138 times
PDF - 190 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Indexing By :

    

 

Flag Counter