EFFORTS TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY THROUGH CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING AT SMP NEGERI 1 BINJAI
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this research was to know whether contextual teaching and learning (CTL) approach could improve students’ mathematical problem solving ability (SMPSA) in eighth grade of SMP Negeri 1 Binjai. The type of this research was Classroom Action Research. The subject of this research was students in class VIII-9 which consisted of 20 students. The object was SMPSA on cube and cuboid topic in eighth grade of SMP Negeri 1 Binjai Academic Year 2015/2016.This study consisted of two cycles. Each cycle had two meetings. SMPSA was tested in the end of cycle. Instrument used to collect data in this research were test and observation sheet. After giving a treatment to students, in the first cycle, the average score of their mathematical problem solving ability was 2.30. Ten of 20 students (50%) obtained score ³ 2.67. The average score of teacher’s activities in observation sheet was 2.66, which classified as good category. The average score of students’ activities in observation sheet was 2.55, which classified as good category. In the second cycle, the average score of mathematical problem solving ability was increased became 3.05 with 18 students (90%) obtained score ³ 2.67. The average score of teacher’s activities in observation sheet was 3.44, which classified as very good category. The average score of students’ activities in observation sheet was 3.22, which classified as very good category. From the result of research, it can be concluded that the implementation of contextual teaching and learning (CTL) approach can improve students’ problem solving ability. The suggestion that given for teachers is to be able to implement contextual teaching and learning (CTL) approach as an alternative in learning process that can improve problem solving ability.
Keywords : Contextual Learning, Mathematical Problem solving AbilityFull Text:
PDFReferences
REFERENCES
Abdurrahman, M., (2009), Pendidikan Bagi Anak Kesulitan Belajar, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Arikunto, S., (2012), Dasar – Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.
Arikunto, S., (2010), Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik , Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Asrori, M., (2007), Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, CV. Wacana Prima, Bandung.
Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan, (2006), Standar Kompetensi dan Kompetensi Dasar Tingkat, Balitbang, Jakarta.
Berns, R., Erickson, P., (2001), Contextual Teaching and Learning: Preparing Students for The New Economy, The Highlight Zone Research @ work: http://www.cord.org/uploadedfiles/NCCTE_Highlight05-ContextualTeachingLearning.pdf (accessed January-February 2016)
Center for student success, (2007), Contextualized Teaching & Learning: A Faculity Primer, California Community Collage, California.
Crawford, M., (2001), Teaching Contextually, CCI Publishing Inc, Waco.
Goos, M., Galbraith, P., and Renshaw, P., (2000), A Money Problem: A Source of Insight Into Problem Solving Action, http://www.cimt. plymouth.ac.uk/journal/pgmoney.pdf (accessed January-February 2016)
Greattorex, J., (2013), Context in Mathematics Examination Question, Cambridge Assessment, Cambridge.
Hake, R., (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Score, http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf (accessed January-February 2016)
Hudojo, H., (2005), Pengembangan Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Matematika, UM Press, Malang.
Komalasari, K., (2010), Pembelajaran Kontekstual; Konsep dan Aplikasi, Refika Aditama, Bandung.
Lukito, A., Turmudi., Juandi, D., (2014), Matematika, Balitbang, Jakarta.
Math is Fun, (2014), https://www.mathsisfun.com/geometry/cuboids-rectangular-prisms.html (accessed January-February 2016)
Moyer, P.S., Niezgoda, D., and Stanley, J., (2005),Young Children’s Use of Virtual Manipulatives and Other Forms of Mathematical Representations, In Masalaski, W.J., and Elliott, P.C., Technology-supported mathematics learning environments, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics:17–34.
National Council of Teacher of Mathematics, (2000), Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, NCTM, Reston Virginia.
Nurkencana, W., (1986), Menjadi Guru Profesional, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.
Permendiknas No.22, (2006), Peraturan Mentri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.
Permendiknas No.104, (2014), Peraturan Mentri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.
Polya, G., (2004), How to Solve It A New Aspect of Mathematical Method, Princeton Science Library, USA.
Ruseffendi, E., (2006), Pengantar Kepada Membantu Guru Mengembangkan Kompetensinya dalam Pengajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan CBSA, Tarsito, Bandung.
Rusman, (2012), Model-model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru Edisi Kedua, PT. Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Sanjaya, W., (2005), Pembelajaran Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.
Satriani, I., Emilia, E., and Gunawan, M., (2012), Contextual Teaching and Learning Approach to Teaching Writing, Journal of Applied Linguistics 2: 10-22.
Schoenfeld, A.H., (1985), Mathematical Problem Solving, Academic Press, New York.
Schoenfeld, A.H., (1992), Learning To Think Mathematically:Problem Solving, Metacognitif, And Sense-Making In Mathematics, MacMillan, New York.
Sukayati, (2008), Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, PPPPTK Matematika, Yogyakarta.
Suyanto, (1997), Pedoman Pelaksanaan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) Pengenalan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, Dirjen Dikti, Yogyakarta.
Trianto, (2009), Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif, Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.
Wardhani, (2010), Pembelajaran Kemampuan Masalah Matematika di SMP, PPPPTK Matematika, Yogjakarta.
Wena, M., (2011), Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.
Widjajanti, D.B., (2009), Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika: Apa dan Bagaimana Mengembangkannya, Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika 25: 402-413.
Yee, P.S., (2014), Developing A Contextualization of Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving, Elsevier Inc, United Stated.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpmi.v3i3.8957
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 174 timesPDF - 180 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indexing By :
