Perbedaan Kecurangan Akademis Siswa SMA ditinjau dari Jenis Kelamin dan Jurusan Sekolah

Rizka Ariyanti Razak


Academic cheating is one of the phenomena that occur in the world of education. Many factors can affect academic cheating including internal, external, and demographics. This study aims to determine differences in academic cheating in terms of demographic factor (gender and schools majors) in high school. Subjects of this study (N = 86) were second-grade students from one of the public high school in Surabaya. Data collection techniques using non-probability sampling. The research method uses comparative quantitative, namely the Mann-Whitney U Test on gender variables and the Kruskall-Wallis test on school majors variables.The results of the Mann-Whitney U Test analysis showed that the significant value was 0.238 and the Kruskal-Wallis test results showed a significant value of 0.229.These results have a significance value greater than 0.05 (p> 0.05) which means there is no difference in academic cheating in terms of gender and school majors. Gender differences and school majors do not guarantee students not to commit academic cheating because the students has the same pressure to get high grades on subjects. This is also supported by the environment that implements the performance goal orientation.


academic cheating; gender; school majors

Full Text:



Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2009). Psychology of Classroom Learning. United States: Gale Publisher.

Anderman, E. M., & Murdock, T. B. (2007). The Psychology of Academic Cheating. Boston: Elseiver.

BBC News. (2015). India student Caught ‘cheating’ in Exams in Bihar.

BBC News. (2016). India's Bihar to crack down on cheating in school exams.

DuPree, D., & Sattler, S. (2010). McCabe Academic Integrity Survey Report. United States: Texas Tech University Ethic Center.

Hunter, Murray. (2015). Rampant academic dishonesty is alive and well in Malaysia.

Josephson Institute of Ethics. (2006). Josephson Institute Report Card on the Ethics of American Youth: Part One - Integrity.

Kartikaningrum, N. I. (2015). OMBUDSMAN BALI: Ada Kecurangan UN di 20 SMA/SMK.

Khodaie, E., Moghadamzadeh, A., & Salehi, K. (2011). Factors Affecting the Probability of Academic Cheating School Students in Tehran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1587-1595.

Lawson, R. A. (2004). Is Classroom Cheating Related to Business Students' Propensity to Cheat in the "Real World"? Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 189-199.

Lin, C.-H. S., & Wen, L.-Y. M. (2007). Academic Dishonesty in Higher Education - A Nationwide Study in Taiwan. High Education, 85-97.

McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Academic Dishonesty: Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences. The Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 522-538.

McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 294-305.

Nejati, M., Jamali, R., & Nejati, M. (2009). Students' Ethical Behavior in Iran. Journal Academic Ethic, 277-285.

Nora, W. L., & Zhang, K. C. (2010). Motives of Cheating Among Secondary Students : The Role of Self-efficacy and Peer Influence. Asia Pasific Education, 573-584.

Nursalam, Bani, S., & Munirah. (2013). Bentuk Kecurangan Akademis (academic cheating) Mahasiswa PGMI Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Alauddin Makassar. Lentera Pendidikan, 16(2), 127-138.

Rujoiu, O., & Rujoiu, V. (2014). Academic Dishonesty and Workplace Dishonesty. An Overview. Proceedings of The 8TH International Management Conference (pp. 928-938). Bucharest, Romania: Management Challenges for Sustainable Development.

Tibbets, S. G. (1999). Differences Between Women and Men Regarding Decisions to Commit Test Cheating. Research in Higher Education, 40(3), 323-342.

Whitley, B. E. (1998). Factors Associated with Cheating among College Students: A review. Research in Higher Education, 39, 235-274.

Whitley, B. E., Nelson, A. B., & Jones, C. J. (1999). Gender differences in cheating attitudes and classroom cheating behavior: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 41, 657-680.

Widayani, N. M., & Hartanti, S. (2014). Kesetaraan dan Keadilan Gender dalam Pandangan Perempuan Bali: Studi Fenomenologis terhadap Penulis Perempuan Bali. Jurnal Psikologi Undip, 13(2), 149-162.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 164 times
PDF - 129 times

Copyright (c) 2022 Rizka Ariyanti Razak

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.