GENDER HUMOR DISCOURSE IN ‘FRIENDS’ COMEDY SERIES
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study deals with Gender Humor Discourse in ‘Friends’ Comedy Series. The aims of the study are 1) to categorize the types of gender humors used in ‘Friends’ comedy series, 2) to describe how gender humors realized in ‘Friends’ comedy series, and 3) to explain the reason of realizing gender humors in ‘Friends’ comedy series in the ways they are. The study used a qualitative descriptive method and a critical discourse analysis approach. The data of the study is drawn from scripts consisted clauses of gender humor discourse in ‘Friends’ comedy series. The techniques for collecting data were observing the plot of the comedy series and selecting episodes which the one that contained the most humor in friendship then download the episodes selected to be observed, after that make documentations by trimming the scenes for making the transcript of dialogues from cut scenes and finding expressions appeared of all players in the comedy series to be observe. The results of study found that there were twenty-six clauses consisted humor types found in this study namely: Self-defeating types were eight (31%). Aggressive types were seven (27%), Affiliative types were six (23%) and elf-enhancing types were five (19%), It can be concluded that Self-defeating types became had high frequency in ‘Friends’ comedy series. From forty-three clauses in ‘Friends’ comedy series, there were nine form of ten humor form realized in ‘Friends’ comedy series, they are Pun form, Riddle form, Joke form, Satire form, Anecdote form, Farce form, Irony form, Sarcasm form, and Wit form. From nine forms of verbal humor, Farce form became had high frequency in the kind of verbal humor of ’Friends’ comedy series. Finally the last study results, there were three reason of realizing humors discourse namely: Universal joke, Cultural Joke, and Linguistic joke.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Creswell, J. W. (2012). EducationalRresearch: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (Fourth Edition.). United State of America. Person Education Inc: https://www.sciepub.com/reference/141162
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd ed.). Longman.
Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual Differences in Uses of Humor and Their relation to Psychological Well-Being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 48–75
Salavera, C., Usan, P., and Jarie, L. (2020). Styles of Humor and Social Skills in Students. Gender Differences. Current Psychology, 39(2), 571-580.
Şahin, A. (2021). Humor Use in School Settings: The Perceptions of Teachers. SAGE Open, 11(2), 215824402110226.
Wu C., Lin H., and Chen H. (2016). Gender Differences in Humor Styles of Young Adolescents: Empathy as a Mediator. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 139–143.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/lt.v19i2.38411
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 203 timesPDF - 118 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Lailan Syafrina Dewi, Anni Holila Pulungan, Widya . Andayani