Application of the MADM Method for the Admission System for Islamic Religious Trustees

Sawitha Yuliana Rinaldy, Aridhanyati Arifin

Abstract


The selection process for Islamic tutor and the decision to pass or fail is made by subjective views of the selector. The konvensional process takes a lot of time. It is necessary to have Decision Support System (DSS) to minimize the subjective side of the selectors and streamline the selection process so that effective decision can be obtained. The character of this problem matches the characteristic of Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM) model. A combination of Simple Addictive Weighting (SAW) and Technique for Others Reference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) are selected to solve MADM model. SAW used to rank decision while TOPSIS used to calculate level 2 criteria. Based on testing of 30 data samples using Single Detection Threshold method, the system performance accuracy rate is 83,33% and precision rate is 77%. The combination of the two method has been successfully applied and provide accurate and precise recommendations.


Keywords


Selection of Islamic Tutor, DSS, MADM, TOPSIS, SAW

Full Text:

PDF

References


S. Hidayat, R. Irviani, and Kasmi. “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Teladan MA Al Mubarok Batu Raja Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS”, Jurnal TAM (Technology Acceptance Model)., vol.6, pp.1-8, Juli 2016.

A, Arifin and A.G. Syarvani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Analisis Kelayakan Pemohon Pinjaman Modal Syariah Menggunakan Kombinasi Metode SAW dan TOPSIS”. Teknoin, vol.23, no.2, pp. 81-92, September 2017.

S. Barus, V. M. Sitorus, D. Napitupulu, Mesran, and Supiyandi. “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pengangkatan Guru Tetap Menerapkan Metode Weight Aggregated Sum Product Assesment (WASPAS)”, Media Informatika Budidarma, vol. 2, no.2, pp.10-15, April 2018.

Diana and I, Seprina. “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Menentukan Penerima Bantuan Sosial Menerapkan Weighted Product Method (WPM)”. Jurnal Edukasi dan Penelitian Informatika, vol.5, no.3, pp. 370-377, Desember 2019.

R. E. Sari and D. Y. H. Tanjung, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Memilih Kulit Ular yang Layak dijadikan Kerajinan Kulit”, Cogito Smart Journal, vol. 6, no.1, pp.12-24, Juni 2020.

P.D. Sari, “SPK Seleksi Penerimaan Guru Baru Pada Yayasan Garis Pena Payakumbuh Menggunakan Metode SAW”. Jurnal Sistem Informasi dan Manajemen Informatika, vol.6, no.2, pp.145-152, Desember 2019.

E. Turban, J.E. Aronson, and T.P. Liang. Decision Support Systems and Intelligent. Pearson/Prentice Hall. 2005.

C.L. Hwang, C.L and Yoon, K.P. Multiple Attribute Decision Making. CA-USA: Sage Publications. 1995

L. Kraujaliene. “Comparative Analysis of Multicriteria Decision Making Methods Evaluating The Efficiency of Technology Transfer”. Business Management and Education, vol.17, pp.72-93. 2019.

E. Roszkowska. “Multi Criteria Decision Making Models by Applying The TOPSIS Method to Crisp and Interval Data”. Multiple Criteria Decision Making, vol.6, pp.200-230. 2011.

T. Prihatin. “Perbandingan Metode TOPSIS Dan SAW Dalam Penentuan Guru Berprestasi”. Jurnal Teknik Komputer, vol. V, no.1, pp.29-34, Februari 2019.

D.N. Nafi’, A. Mulyanto, and M.G. Wonoseto. “Perbandingan Sensitivitas Metode SAW Dan TOPSIS Dalam Pemilihan Ustadz Teladan Ponpes Wahid Hasyim Yogyakarta”, Fountain of Informatics Journal, vol.6, no. 1, pp.34-44, Mei 2021.

S. Kusumadewi, S. Hartati, A. Harjoko, and R. Wardoyo, Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu. 2006.

D. Owens and H, Sox. Biomedical Decision Making: Probabilistic Clinical Reasoning. In: Shortliffe & Cimino (Ed). Biomedical Informatics, pp. 80-129. 2006.

R.Kurniawan, I. Muhimmah, and H.R.Jannah.”Sistem Monitoring Perkembangan Anak Berbasis Denver Development Screening Test (DDST / Denver II)”. Teknoin, vol.22, no.4, pp.305-314. Desember 2016.

R. Aprilia and R. Widyasari. “Implementasi Metode Promethee Dalam Penentuan Penerima Bantuan Zakat pada Mahasiswa”. Journal of Computer Engineering System and Science (CESS), vol.6, no.2, pp.155-161. Juli 2021.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/cess.v7i1.29334

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 56 times
PDF - 55 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

CESS (Journal of Computer Engineering, System and Science)

Creative Commons License
CESS (Journal of Computer Engineering, System and Science) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License