REGISTERIAL REPRESENTATION IN KARONESE MANTRA TEXT

ERA MELANI TARIGAN, IMMANUEL PRASETYA GINTINGS, ELIA MASA GINTINGS

Abstract


The objectives of this study were conducted to find the registerial representation implied in Karonese mantra text in erpangir ku lau, and to discover the registerial representation in the karonese mantra text. This research was conducted by descriptive qualitative method. The finding of this study showed that the registerial reprsentaion are implied in karonese mantra text in Erpangir ku lau were Field, tenor and Mode. Field is realization of experiential meanings; these experiential meaning are realized through transitivity pattern, from 6 kinds of total process in transitivity there is only five types were implied in karonese mantra text, they were material, relational ,mental, verbal and behavioral process in this text. the tenor is the realization of Interpersonal meanings; these interpersonal meaning through the mood, there just 2 kinds from 3 total mood that found in karonese mantra text, they were declarative and imperative. In Mode that realizes in Theme pattern found that all of 4 types in Theme were implied in this text. This theory also related to the register language, the Frozen and formal discovered in karonese mantra text.

Keywords


Register language, mantra, erpangir ku lau traditional event, field, tenor, frozen style, formal style, consultative style, casual style, intimate style.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdulahman, Wael. 2016. An Introdutiocn to Halliday’s Systemic Funnctional Linguistics. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal for study of English Linguistics.

Arkunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosuder Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Chaer, Abdul. 1995. Sosiolinguistik Perkenalan Awal. Jakarta: Rinekacipta.

Halliday, M.A.K.2002. Linguistic studies of Text and Discourse. London: Continuum (Edited by Jonathan J. Webster)

Halliday,M. A.K. 1994. An introduction to Functional Grammar: Second edition. London: Edward Arnold.

Joos, M 1967. The Five Clocks. Bloomington: Indiana Universtity Research Center in Antropologhy, Folklore, and Linguistics.

Lewandowki, M. 2010. “ Sociolect and Register- Contrastitive Analysis of Two Kinds of Linguistic Variation: InvestigatonesLinguisticae “, vol 20:60. Poznan: Intitute of Linguistics, Adam Mickewicz University.

L, J and Lewis, J. 2003. Qualitative Research Pratice. A Guide for: sciene students and research. London: SAGE Publication.

Miles, B. Matthew, Huberman, A. Michael, &Saldana, Johnny (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: a Method Sourcebook, Edition3, USA: SAGE




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jalu.v11i1.34492

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 166 times
PDF - 119 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 ERA MELANI TARIGAN, IMMANUEL PRASETYA GINTINGS, ELIA MASA GINTINGS

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

 

Creative Commons License

Linguistica: Journal of Linguistics of FBS UNIMED is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.