Analysis of Differences of Mathematics Tadris Curriculum, Mathematics Education in PTKIN and PTUN Based on IndoMS Minimum Recommendations

Mutijah Mutijah, Ulfah Rulli Hastuti

Abstract


Knowledge of amount of credits in certain curriculum groups is considered important to know compliance with a mutually agreed upon curriculum from  IndoMS. Two aims of this research results article to investigate the differences in course materials of curriculum of  Mathematics Tadris at PTKIN, Mathematics Education at PTKIN and PTUN and illustrate how they differences statistically. One Way Variance Analysis to analyze whether there are differences at overall and each course materials of mathematics in the recommended curriculum by IndoMS. Sample were all PTKIN and PTUN in Java, Jakarta and Special Region of Yogyakarta registered on the internet  a number of 18 was taken from those who uploaded their curriculum. Descriptive statistics to describe amount of minimum, maximum, and average of adopted credits, and whether or not there are those who adopt the same. The result showed  that in general, there is no difference in the Mathematics Education Curriculum at PTUN and PTKIN as well as the Mathematics Tadris at PTKIN in adopting credits for course materials. While  for each there are no differences in Discrete Mathematics, Statistics and Probability Theory, Complex Functions, Introduction to Real Analysis, Introduction to Numerical Analysis, Algorithms and Programming, Differential Equations, Linear Programs, and Mathematical Modeling, but there are differences in Differential and Integral Calculus, Algebra, and Geometry. The Mathematics Education Curriculum at PTUN and PTKIN as well as Mathematics Tadris mostly adopt minimum credits less than those recommended by IndoMS. Maximum credits of Mathematics Education at PTUN and Mathematics Tadris curriculum adopts more than and Mathematics Education curriculum of PTKIN adopts the same.  Above 50% of Mathematics Education curriculum at PTUN adopts more than, while Mathematics Education and Tadris at PTKIN adopt less than. In the Mathematics Education Curriculum at PTUN and PTKIN as well as Tadris,a few of them have adopted the same

Full Text:

PDF

References


Faisal & Zaivar, M. (2021). Analisis Keterpakaian Kurikulum Prodi Pendidikan Matematika FTIK IAIN Langsa pada Dunia Kerja Alumni. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Al-Qalasadi, 5(1), 89-98.

Gaspersz, V. (1991). Metode Perancangan Percobaan. Bandung: CV. ARMICO.

I.K. Amalina, S. S. (2023). The Comparison of Hungarian and Indonesian Curriculum: A Case Study or sced 2 Mathematics and Sciences Curriculum. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia JPII, 12(1), 112-122. Retrieved from http://journal.unnes.ac.id/index.php/jpii

IndoMS. (2022). Surat Keputusan Presiden Himpuanan Matematika Indonesia tentang Penetapan Rekomendasi IndoMS untuk Kurikulum Minimal Program Studi Sarjana Matematika di Indonesia.

Indonesia. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia No. 49 Tahun 2014 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi.

Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia No. 3 Tahun 2020 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi.

Jihad, A. (1991). Pengembangan Kurikulum Matematika (Tinjauan Teoritis dan Historis). Bandung: Multi Pressindo.

Jonathan, S. M. (2021). Perkembangan Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika di Indonesia Berdasarkan Filosofi. SERPEN:Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied, 02(02).

Kurikulum, T. (2014). Rumusan Naskah Akademik, Capaian Pembelajaran, dan Struktur Kurikulum. Jakarta: Balai Sidang UI Kampus Depok.

Mutia & Arbaini Wahyuningsih, W. (2019). Tantangan, Harapan, dan Peluang Tadris Matematika dalam Mewujudkan Guru Matematika yang Islami, Profesional, dan Kompetitif. Academic Journal of Math Arithmetic, 01(02), 143-164.

Penyusun, T. (2020). Kurikulum 2020:Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka Berbasis Kompetensi Mengacu KKNI Program Studi Tadris Matematika . Purwokerto: Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan IAIN Purwokerto.

Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung : Alfabeta.

Sulistya, S. (2022). Komparasi Kurikulum Matematika di Indonesia Vs Belanda Studi Literatur Matematika Modern dalam Teori dan Praktik Pembelajaran. Jurnal Matematika Ilmiah JuMlahku, 8.1, 150-155.

Supriyoko, S. R. (2022). Online Survey:Evaluation Indonesian Higher Education Curriculum. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, Vol 12, No. 4, 235-240.

Vevi Sunarti, H. R. (2022). Comparison of Indonesian and Finnish EducationCurriculum. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education (JSHE), Vol 2, No. 2, 141-152. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v2i2.808

Yusuf, W. (2005). Metode Statistik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/paradikma.v17i2.58943

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 21 times
PDF - 6 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Published By:
Study Program of Mathematics Education
Postgraduate Program of UNIMED

 
Visit us at:


slot gacor slot