ANALYSIS OF COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS IN GENERAL BIOLOGY LEARNING MEDIA

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Apr 11, 2022
https://doi.org/10.24114/jpp.v10i1.30044
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Trio Ageng Prayitno
IKIP Budi Utomo
Nuril Hidayati
IKIP Budi Utomo

Abstract

The existence of cognitive assessments in learning media that does not require much consideration for their feasibility as a measuring tool is one of the problems that arise because it can cause misinformation obtained by the teacher. The purpose of this study was to determine the construct validity and content of the cognitive assessment instrument and the validity of the questions, the reliability of the questions, the distinguishing power of the questions, and the level of difficulty of the questions on the cognitive assessment instruments to be used in general biology learning media. The research method used is descriptive quantitative through a survey involving one expert and 58 students of the Biology Education study program of IKIP Budi Utomo. The research limitation is a cognitive assessment of microbiology material in general biology courses. The type of instrument analyzed is a test. The results obtained are that the cognitive assessment instrument has a valid level of validity from the aspect of construct and content, the validity of the questions in the valid category, the reliability of the questions is moderate, the discriminatory power of the questions is good, and the level of difficulty of the questions is moderate. The conclusion is that the cognitive assessment instrument is appropriate to be used as an appropriate measuring tool for microbiology material in general biology learning media.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Ageng Prayitno, T., & Hidayati, N. (2022). ANALYSIS OF COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS IN GENERAL BIOLOGY LEARNING MEDIA. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.24114/jpp.v10i1.30044

References

  1. Arafah, K. (2018). Test Instrument Development for Science Process Skills in Mechanic Wave Topic for Grade XI SMA Student. In: Proceeding Book Volume 1 1st International Conference On Educational Assessment And Policy (ICEAP 2018). http://eprints.unm.ac.id/16667/
  2. Arifin, Z. (2017). Kriteria instrumen dalam suatu penelitian. Jurnal Theorems, 2(1), 301743.
  3. Asyhari, A., & Silvia, H. (2016). Pengembangan media pembelajaran berupa buletin dalam bentuk buku saku untuk pembelajran IPA terpadu. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni [Journal of Physics Education Al-Biruni], 5(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.24042/jpifalbiruni.v5i1.100
  4. Azizah, Z. F., Kusumaningtyas, A. A., Anugraheni, A. D., & Sari, D. P. (2018). Validasi preliminary product Fung-Cube pada pembelajaran fungi untuk siswa SMA. Jurnal Bioedukatika, 6(1), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v6i1.7364
  5. Debeer, D., & Janssen, R. (2013). Modeling itemposition effects within an IRT framework. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(2), 164-185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12009
  6. Dewi, S. K., & Sudaryanto, A. (2020). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Kuisioner Pengetahuan, Sikap dan Perilaku Pencegahan Demam Berdarah. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Keperawatan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta (pp. 73-79). https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/bitstream/handle/11617/11916/Call For Paper NEW-78-84.pdf?sequence=1
  7. Firdaos, R. (2017). Developing and testing the construct validity instrument of Tadzkiyatun Nafs. Addin, 11(2), 433-462. https://doi.org/10.21043/addin.v11i2.2497
  8. Flake, J. K., Pek, J., & Hehman, E. (2017). Construct validation in social and personality research: Current practice and recommendations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 370-378.https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617693063
  9. Hidayat, P. (2015). Pengembangan Instrumen Baku Penilaian Kualitas Lembar Kerja Siswa Tematik Sub Sains Sekolah Dasar Kelas Tinggi. Al-Bidayah: jurnal pendidikan dasar Islam, 7(2).
  10. Hidayati, N., & Irmawati, F. (2019). Developing digital multimedia of human anatomy and physiology material based on STEM education. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(3), 497-510. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i3.8584
  11. Hidayati, N., & Irmawati, F. (2020). A Survey on the SETS-Based Human Anatomy and Physiology Course: Analysis of Instruments for Assessing Critical Thinking Skills Using Multimedia. In Proceeding Biology Education Conference: Biology, Science, Enviromental, and Learning (Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 112-119). https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/54048
  12. Hidayati, N., Pangestuti, A. A., & Prayitno, T. A. (2019). Edmodo mobile: Developing e-module biology cell for online learning community. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 12(1), 94-108. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v12n1.94-108
  13. Kereh, C. T., Tjiang, P. C., & Sabandar, J. (2015). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Tes Matematika Dasar yang Berkaitan dengan Pendahuluan Fisika Inti. Jurnal Pendidikan, 2(01). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/267822994.pdf
  14. Kumar, H., Kumar, S., Dalabh, M., & Ahmad, J. (2016). Measurement and Evaluation in Education.
  15. Kusumawati, M., & Hadi, S. (2018). An analysis of multiple choice questions (MCQs): Item and test statistics from mathematics assessments in senior high school. REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 4(1), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v4i1.20202
  16. Lia, R. M., Rusilowati, A., & Isnaeni, W. (2020). NGSS-Oriented chemistry test instruments: validity and reliability analysis with the rasch model. REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 6(1), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v6i1.30112
  17. Moafian, F., Ostovar, S., Griffiths, M. D., & Hashemi, M. (2019). The construct validity and reliability of the ˜characteristics of successful efl teachers questionnaire (Coseflt-q)™revisited. Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras, (31), 53-73. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/7015456.pdf
  18. Mokshein, S. E., Ishak, H., & Ahmad, H. (2019). The use of rasch measurement model in English testing. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(1), 16-32. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i1.22750
  19. Mujianto, S. (2017). Analisis daya beda soal. taraf kesukaran, butir tes, validitas butir tes, interpretasi hasil tes valliditas ramalan dalam evaluasi pendidikan. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Pendidikan Islam, 2(2), 2.
  20. Nuryani, N. (2019). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Kuesioner Pengetahuan, Sikap dan Perilaku Gizi Seimbang Pada Remaja. Ghidza: Jurnal Gizi dan Kesehatan, 3(2), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.22487/ghidza.v3i2.19
  21. Pratama, D. (2019). Analysis Of Clasical Test Theory (CTT) Approch on Academic Ability Test Instrument. JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation, 5(2), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.21009/jisae.052.05
  22. Prayitno, T. A., & Hidayati, N. (2017). Pengembangan multimedia interaktif bermuatan materi mikrobiologi berbasis edmodo android. Bioilmi: Jurnal Pendidikan, 3(2), 86-93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19109/bioilmi.v3i2.1399
  23. Prayitno, T. A., & Hidayati, N. (2020). Multimedia development based on science technology engineering and mathematics in microbiology learning. JPBIO (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 5(2), 234-247. https://doi.org/10.31932/jpbio.v5i2.879
  24. Puspitasari, E. D., Susilo, M. J., & Febrianti, N. (2019). Developing psychomotor evaluation instrument of biochemistry practicum for university students of biology education. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 5(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v5i1.22126
  25. Sa™diyah, W., Suarsini, E., & Ibrohim, I. (2016). Pengembangan modul bioteknologi lingkungan berbasis penelitian matakuliah bioteknologi untuk mahasiswa S1 Universitas Negeri Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(9), 1781-1786.
  26. Strauss, M. E., & Smith, G. T. (2009). Construct validity: Advances in theory and methodology. Annual review of clinical psychology, 5, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153639
  27. Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research (August 10, 2016). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040
  28. Tamimiya, K. T., Ghani, A. A., & Putra, P. D. A. (2017). Pengembangan modul pembelajaran IPA berbasis SETS untuk meningkatkan collaborative problem solving skills siswa SMP pada pokok bahasan cahaya. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 5(4), 392-398. https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JPF/article/view/4344
  29. Van Lankveld, W., Jones, A., Brunnekreef, J. J., Seeger, J. P., & Bart Staal, J. (2017). Assessing physical therapist students™ self-efficacy: measurement properties of the physiotherapist self-efficacy (PSE) questionnaire. BMC medical education, 17(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1094-x
  30. Walid, A., Sajidan, S., Ramli, M., & Kusumah, R. G. T. (2019). Construction of the assessment concept to measure students' high order thinking skills. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 237-251. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.528180
  31. Zhongshannvga, L. L. (2007). Designing and Revising a Multiple Choice Vocabulary Test.