Online Learning Difficulties Analysis for Class of 2020 Students Universitas Negeri Medan for Lower Organism Taxonomy Course

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Elvida Harianti Harahap

Abstract

The purpose in this research was to find out the learning difficulties of Biology students Universitas Negeri Medan during online learning and factors that cause learning difficulties. The research method uses a descriptive qualitative approach. The research population is Biology students Universitas Negeri Medan, the sample used is PSBD D and PSBD E 2020 students. The instrument used is a questionnaire distributed using a google form. The results of the research based on the DPNA score, the level of learning difficulty experienced by Biology students Universitas Negeri Medan is relatively low. Even though student scores were in the good category, it turned out that PSBD D and PSBD E students in 2020 experienced several difficulties during online learning, including: difficulty understanding the topic in Lower Organism Taxonomy course with an average of 68%. Did not understand the explanation given by the lecturer with an average of 47%. Did not understand the instructions given by the lecturer during the learning process with an average of 57%. Difficulty understanding the features contained in the SIPDA system with an average of 26%. Experienced difficulties in accessing the internet network during the online learning process with an average of 60%. Experienced quota limitations during the online learning process with an average of 43%. The factors causing learning difficulties for biology students class of PSBD D and PSBD E 2020 include internal factors and external factors. Based on internal factors with an average of 58% classified as difficult enough. While external factors with an average of 59% are classified as difficult enough.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Harahap, E. H. (2023). Online Learning Difficulties Analysis for Class of 2020 Students Universitas Negeri Medan for Lower Organism Taxonomy Course. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.24114/jpp.v11i4.43723

References

  1. Dini, R., & Syahidul, M. (2021). Sarana dan Prasarana
  2. dalam mendukung pembelajaran daring pada
  3. masa pandemic covid-19. Jurnal inspirasi
  4. manajemen pendidikan. 9(1): 186-199
  5. Hasanah, A., Lestari, A. S., Rahman, A. Y., dan Daniel,
  6. Y. I. (2020). Analisis aktivitas belajar daring
  7. mahasiswa pada pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal
  8. Pendidikan. Vol. 1 (1).
  9. He, W., Xu, G., & Kruck, S. (2014). Online IS Education
  10. for the 21st Century. Journal of Information
  11. Systems Education.
  12. Mudjiman, S. (2013). Manajemen pelatihan berbasis
  13. belajar mandiri. Yogyakarta: Pustaka pelajar
  14. Pramuniati, I. (2019). Analisis Kurikulum KKNI
  15. Berdasarkan Kebutuhan Stakeholder di Era
  16. Revolusi Industri 4.0. Laporan Akhir. Fakultas
  17. Bahasa dan Seni Universitas Negeri Medan.
  18. Rimbarizki, R. (2017). Penerapan pembelajaran
  19. daring kombinasi dalam meningkatkan
  20. motivasi belajar peserta didik. J+PLUS UNESA.
  21. (2). 1-12.
  22. Shi, H., Han, X., Jiang, N., Cao, Y., Alwalid, O., Gu, J. &
  23. Zheng, C. (2020). Radiological findings from 81
  24. patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan,
  25. China: a descriptive study. The Lancet
  26. Infectious Diseases.
  27. Sianturi, S. & Gultom, T. (2016). Analisis Kesulitan
  28. Belajar dan Hubungannya dengan Hasil
  29. Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi
  30. Siswa Kelas X Negeri 1 Sidikalang Tahun
  31. Pembelajaran 2015/2016. Jurnal Pelita
  32. Pendidikan. Vol. 4 (1): 170-178.
  33. Siregar, H. S., Sugilar, H., Ukit, U., dan Hambali, H.
  34. (2020). Merekonstruksi alam dalam kajian
  35. sains dan agama: Studi kasus pada masa
  36. Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar (PSBB)
  37. dampak Covid-19. Digital Library UIN Sunan
  38. Gunung Djati Bandung.
  39. Sohrabi, C., Alsafi, Z.,O™Neill, N., Khan, M., Kerwan, A.,
  40. Al-Jabir, A., & Agha, R. (2020). World Health
  41. Organization declares global emergency: A
  42. review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID19). International Journal of Surgery.
  43. Sudjana Nana. (2009). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar
  44. Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  45. Susana, A. (2015). Manajemen kesehatan peserta
  46. didik sekolah dasar. Sukabumi: Universitas
  47. Pendidikan Indonesia
  48. Syamsuddin, S. (2019). Pengembangan Perangkat
  49. Pembelajaran IPA Berorientasi Model
  50. Pembelajaran Pemaknaan Untuk
  51. Meningkatkan Motivasi Dan Hasil Belajar
  52. Siswa PDF Wustha. Jurnal Penelitian
  53. Pendidikan IPA, 3(2), 50-57.
  54. Syarifudin, A. S. (2020). Impelementasi Pembelajaran Daring
  55. Untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan Sebagai
  56. Dampak Diterapkannya Social Distancing. Jurnal
  57. Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Metalingua.
  58. Vol. 5(1).
  59. Tobing, K. N., (2015). Analisis Faktor Kesulitan Belajar Siswa
  60. Pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi Terhadap Hasil Belajar
  61. Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 19 Medan Tahun
  62. Pembelajaran 2014/2015, Skripsi, FMIPA, Unimed,
  63. Medan.
  64. Yunita, R., & Hanifah, U. (2020). Pengaruh pembelajaran
  65. daring terhadap minat belajar siswa pada masa covid
  66. Jurnal pendidikan sains & matematika. 2(3)
  67. -243.
  68. Zikra. (2016). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Kesulitan
  69. Belajar Biologi Siswa Kelas VII MTsS PGAI Padang.
  70. Jurnal BioCONCETTA. Vol. 2(2): 93-102.