Development Of Google Form-Based Learning Outcome Evaluation Instruments For Animal Development Courses In The Biology Education Study Program FMIPA UNIMED
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a valid and reliable google form-based learning outcome evaluation instrument for the Animal Development course. The instrument was developed following the 4D development model (define, design, develop, dessiminate). The research subjects were Biology Education Study Program (PSPB) class of 2021 class B students totaling 26 people. Data were obtained from validation questionnaires and student response questionnaires. The initial design of the learning outcome evaluation instrument consisted of 50 questions. Based on the validator's assessment, an instrument consisting of 25 valid and reliable questions was obtained. The results of validation by evaluation instrument experts obtained an average percentage of 98.6% with a very feasible category. Based on the validity analysis of the Aiken index, the value V = 0.942 was obtained with high validity criteria. Instrument reliability using Cronbach's Alpha obtained a value of 0.796 with high criteria (reliable), while the analysis of ICC reliability data obtained the results of inter-rater agreement of 0.796, and for each rater the consistency is 0.565. It can be concluded that the agreement between raters is very strong and each rater has a fairly good consistency. The results of the data analysis of student responses showed that each indicator was rated very well with an average percentage of 88%.
theresa612Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aiken, L.R. (1980). Content Validity and Reliability of Single Items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4):955-959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1):131-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Alwiyah, U., Syamsudduha, & Ali, A. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian kognitif Berbasis Google Form pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi. Jurnal Al-Ahya, 2(3): 129-148.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, S. (2016). Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta:Rineka Cipta.
Batubara, H. H. & Ariani, D. N. (2016). Workshoop Penggunaan Google Form sebagai Media Evaluasi Pembelajaran pada Dosen-dosen Fakultas Studi Islam. Jurnal Al-Ikhlas, 2(1): 39-44.
Batubara, H. H. (2016). Penggunaan Google Form sebagai Alat Penilaian Kinerja Dosen di Prodi PGMI UNISKA Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari. Al-Bidayah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 8(1): 39-50.
Chazan, B. (2022). What Is “Education”?. In: Principles and Pedagogies in Jewish Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83925-3_3
Fleiss, J. L. (1975). Measuring Agreement Between Two Judges on the Presence or Absence of a Trait. Biometrics, 31(3):651. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529549
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2004). The Measurement of Interrater Agreement. In Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions (pp.598-626). Jhon Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471445428.ch18
Guilford, J. P. (1956). Fundamental Statistics in Psycology and Education (3rd ed). McGraw-Hill.
Hadijah & Anggereni, S. (2016). Pengembangan isntrumen tes hasil belajar kognitif mata pelajaran fisiska pada pokok bahasan momentum dan impuls SMA kelas XI. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 4 (1):30-34.
Meirawati, E., Azis, A., & Rohmadi, M. (2021). Pemanfaatan Google Form sebagai Alat Evaluasi Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di SMKN 2 Palangka Raya. Muallimun: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Keguruan, 1(1): 15-26.
Merdekawati, K. (2017). Pengembangan Isntrumen Penilaian Untuk Kerja Praktikum Kimia Fisika. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 20(1): 24-32.
Multin, H. A., Munawar, W., & Noor, R. A. M. (2018). Penyusunan dan Analisis Tes Kinerha (Performance Test) pada Kompetensi pRaktik Memasang Sistem Penerangan dan Wiring Kelistrikan di SMK. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 5(2): 164-172.
Nabil, N. R. A., Wulandari, I., Yamtinah, S., Ariani, S. R. D., & Ulfa, M. (2022). Analisis Indeks Aiken untuk Mengetahui Validitas Isi Instrumen Assesmen Kompetisi Minimum Berbasis Konteks Sains Kimia. Jurnal Penelitian pendidikan, 25(2): 184-191.
Nurfillaili, U., T. Yusuf, M., & Anggereni, S. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Hasil Belajar Kognitif Mata Pelajaran Fisika Pada Pokok Bahasan Usaha Dan Energi SMA Negeri Khusus Jeneponto Kelas XI Semester I. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 4 (2): 83-87.
Rachmawati & Kurniawati, A. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Tes Berbasis Mobile Online pada Prodi Pendidikan Matematika. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1): 46-63.
Retnawati, H. (2016). Proving content validity of self-regulated learning scale (The comparison of Aiken index and expanded Gregory index). Research and Evaluation in Education, 2(2): 155-164. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i2.11029
Ropii, M. & Fahrurrozi, M. (2017). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Pancor Selong Lombok Timur, NTB: Universitas Hamzanwadi Press.
Sudijono, A. (2015). Pengantar Statistika Pendidikan. Jakarta:Rajagrafindo.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Tomoliyus, T. & Sunardianta, R. (2020). Validitas dan reliabilitas Instrumen Tes Reaktif Agility Tenis Meja. Jurnal Keolahragaan, 8(2): 148-157.
Utami, L. W. S. (2021). Penggunaan Google Form dalam Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Inovasi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(3): 150-156.
Z. Putri, R., Sari, R., Jumadi, & Ariswan. (2020). Pengembangan dan Validasi Instrumen Tes untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Menyelesaikan Masalah peserta Didik SMA pada Pelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelejaran Fisika, 11(1): 17-25.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpp.v11i4.54943
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 100 timesPDF - 71 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
