PENILAIAN KEAKTIFAN MAHASISWA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PENILAIAN PORTOFOLIO PADA PERKULIAHAN MORFOLOGI TUMBUHAN DI JURUSAN BIOLOGI UNIMED

Ashar Hasairin

Abstract


The objektive of research is to get the avchivement value of autodidactstudent in Plant Morfology lecture by using portofolio model evaluation.  Theresearch method of examing avct is teaching by speech, discussion and questionanswer provided by slide teaching media chart in class, laboratory and in the field. The activity  consists of cycle 1: Organum nutritivum); cycle 2: Organumreproduvctivum. Each cycle evaluation is provided by test (pretest – postest andpersonal task) in portofolio evaluation. The assesment of practice report based on thecompletion of observation data.  Mean while the active assesment based on thedeligen, accuratiose  corettness corettness and independence. The result of thisactifity is goined that petest and  postest score in cycle 1 and 2 toward the score A,B, C and the degreasing of student quantity whivch gets score D and E in each item. Mean while category the scoring of personal task of cycle 1 and 2 wholly is verygood and good category (score A and B) category is higher than enough and lesscategory (Score C and D), not good category (score E) is not found.  The teachingmodel by practice is more precice to do student can see directly their plant object. Meanwhile for the scoring task and paper writing student face probem in masteringliterature and terminology.  The active student scoring of civcle 1 & 2 seemed thatthe adventage in correctness of understanding item and determining observedobject.

Keywords


Active Assesment, Portofolio, Plant Morfology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bates, G. R. 1978. The role of the Laboratory in

Secondary School Science Program. In

M. B. Rowe (ed.) What resrearch says

to the science Teacher Association.

Bryce, T. G. K. & Robertson, I. J. 1985.

What can they do ? Areview of Practical

Assesment in Science. The Studies in

Science Education 12 : 1 – 24

Chemmis, S. & Taggart. 1988. The Action

Resrearch Planner. Gelong. Victoria

Deakin, University Press.

Greech, J. L. 1970. Tactics of Exploration and

Collection. In. O. H. Frannkel and

Barnnet Conservation. Oxford and

Edinburgh. Blacweel Scientific

Publication.

Hasairin, A. , Tri H., & Dingin, S. 1998.

Peningkatan Kemampuan Mahasiswa

Dalam Teknik Identifikasi dan

Pembuatan Spesimen Herbarium Pada

Perkuliahan Morfologi Tumbuhan

Jakarta. Artikel Jurnal Penelitian RIIPGSM

DIKTI

Hasairin, A., Tri Harsono., Cicik Suryani &

Martina Restuati. 2001. Upaya

Peningkatan Kualitas Perkuliahan

Morfologi Tumbuhan Melalui Buku

Ajar dan Alam Sekitar dengan Model

Belajar Interaktif. Jakarta. Laporan

Penelitian DCRG URGE Dikti.

Hosftein, A. & Lunetta, N. V. 1982. The role of

the laboratory in science teaching.

Neglected aspects of research. Review of

Educational Research. 52 (2) : 201 –

Rifai, M. A. 1979. Daftar Istilah Biologi. Pusat

Pembinaan dan Pengembangan

Bahasa. Jakarta. Depdikbud.

Susilo, H. 1993. Pengelolaan Kegiatan

Laboratorium. Malang. Makalah

Pelatihan Pengelolaan Laboratorium

IPA-Biologi Bagi Guru MAN Sejawa

Timur.

Tamir, P. 1974. An inquiry-Oriented Laboratory

Examination. Journal of Education

Measurement. 11: 23- 35.

Tjitrosoepomo, G. 1990. Morfologi Tumbuhan.

Yogyakarta. Gadjah Mada Univerity

Press.

Yudianto, S. A. 1992. Mengerti Morfologi

Tumbuhan. Bandung. Penerbit Tarsito.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpbp.v18i3.4288

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 429 times
PDF - 8 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)