PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN MOTIVASI BERPRESTASI TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA

Rosliana Siregar

Abstract


This research aim to know of difference between result learn the studentmathematics taught by using strategy of study cooperative type STAD and result oflearning student mathematics by using strategy of study ekspositori. The  method isquasi experiment. This research is executed SMP Negeri 11 Medan. Instrumentused together the data  test result of learning and enquette motivate to haveachievement. Technique analysis the data used by ANAVA 2x2. The result analysisof research indicate that result learn the student mathematics taught by usingstrategy study of higher type STAD cooperative than result learn the studentmathematics taught by using strategy of study ekspositori (Fcalculate = 4,698 >Ftabel = 3,96;  there are difference which signifikan of result learn the studentmathematics having high achievement motivation with the student having lowmotivation achievement, (Fcalculate = 27,9 > Ftabel = 3,96), and there areinteraction between study strategy and motivate to have achievement in influencingresult learn the student mathematics (Fcalculate = 12,45 > Ftabel = 3,96). Result ofinferential research that strategy study of better type STAD cooperative taught tostudent having motivation  have high achievement and good study ekspositoristrategy used to student having motivation  have low achievement and there areinteraction of study strategy and motivate the to have achievement.

Keywords


Strategy, Motivate, Achievement, Mathematics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arends, R. I. (1998) Learning to teach. New

York. Mc Graw Hill Companies.

Arikunto, S. (1999). Prosedur penelitian, suatu

pendekatan praktek. Jakarta. Rineka

Cipta.

Dick, W. & Carey, L. (1985). The systematic

design of instruction. Illions: Scott

Foresman and Company.

Gagne, R. M. (1985). The condition of

learning. New York. Halt Rinahart

and Wiston.

Hamalik, O. (2003). Perencanaan pengajaran.

Jakarta. Buki Aksara.

Ibrahim M. (2002). Pembelajaran kooperatif.

Surabaya. UNESA. University Press.

Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1989).

Cooperation and competition theory

and research. Edina, MN: Interaction

Book Company.

Joyce, B., Weil, M. (1996). Models of teaching.

th ed., Boston. Allyn & Bacon.

Lie, A. (2004). Cooverative leraning. Jakarta.

PT. Grasindo.

Nur M. (1999). Teori belajar. Surabaya.

UNESA. University Press.

Nasution, N. (1987). Evaluasi pengajaran.

Jakarta. PPUT

Rasyid, M. (2004). Efektifitas strategi

pembelajaran kooperatif dan

kemampuan awal terhadap hasil

belajar fisika. Medan. Tesis PPS

Unimed.

Stephen, K., Robert, E. R. (1980). Problem

solving in school mathematics.

National Council of Teachers of

Mathematis.

Slavin, E. R. (1995). Cooperative learning.

America Serikat : All Yu and Bacon.

Sudjana. (2002). Metode statistika. Bandung

Tarsito.

Sudjana, N. (2005). Penilaian hasil proses

belajar mengajar. Bandung. PT

Remaja Rosdakarya.

Surianta, I. M. (2008). Penerapan model

pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD

dengan media VCD untuk

meningkatkan prestasi belajar

matematika. http: /www.google.com.

(Diakses 18 Januari 2009).

Uno, B. H. (2008). Teori motivasi dan

pengukuran. Jakarta. Bumi Aksara

Winkel, W. S. (2005). Psikologi pengajaran.

Yogyakarta. Media Abadi.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpbp.v18i3.4292

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 371 times
PDF - 2 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)

slot gacor slot