LOGICO-SEMANTIC RELATION IN SRI MULYANI INDRAWATI’S SPEECH
Abstract
This study deals with logico-semantic relation in Sri Mulyani Indrawati’s speech.
The objectives of this study were to describe the logico-semantic type and how
logico-semantic used in the speech. This study was conducted by using
descriptive qualitative. The data of this study were clause complexes found in the
Sri Mulyani’s speech. There were 142 clause complexes as the sample. Based on
the analysis, it was found that only eight of ten types of logico-semantic were
used in Sri Mulyani’s speech. The types that were not found are Paratactic
Locution and Paratactic Idea. The most occurrence type of logico-semantic was
Paratactic Extension (26.76%). Then followed by Hypotactic Enhancement
(23.23%), Hypotactic Elaboration (21.12%), Hypotactic Extension (19.01%),
Paratactic Elaboration (4.92%), Paratactic Enhancement (2.81%), Hypotactic Idea
(1.41%), and Hypotactic Locution (0.71%). For the use of paratactic extension as
the most used by Sri Mulyani indicates that she presented her ideas by adding,
varying, and replacing the messages by using the conjunctions and, but, and or.
The objectives of this study were to describe the logico-semantic type and how
logico-semantic used in the speech. This study was conducted by using
descriptive qualitative. The data of this study were clause complexes found in the
Sri Mulyani’s speech. There were 142 clause complexes as the sample. Based on
the analysis, it was found that only eight of ten types of logico-semantic were
used in Sri Mulyani’s speech. The types that were not found are Paratactic
Locution and Paratactic Idea. The most occurrence type of logico-semantic was
Paratactic Extension (26.76%). Then followed by Hypotactic Enhancement
(23.23%), Hypotactic Elaboration (21.12%), Hypotactic Extension (19.01%),
Paratactic Elaboration (4.92%), Paratactic Enhancement (2.81%), Hypotactic Idea
(1.41%), and Hypotactic Locution (0.71%). For the use of paratactic extension as
the most used by Sri Mulyani indicates that she presented her ideas by adding,
varying, and replacing the messages by using the conjunctions and, but, and or.
Full Text:
PDFDOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jalu.v4i3.6678
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 140 timesPDF - 1 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2015 Muliani and Juli Rachmadani Hasibuan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
Linguistica: Journal of Linguistics of FBS UNIMED is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.