Focus and Scope

Jurnal Fibonaci: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika berisi artikel-artikel mengenai pendidikan matematika yang ditulis dalam bahasa Indonesia maupun bahasa Inggris. Naskah berupa diseminasi hasil penelitian yang dihasilkan oleh ahli, ilmuwan, praktisi, dan mahasiswa dalam bidang Pendidikan Matematika dengan lingkup:

• Desain Pembelajaran Matematika
• Pengembangan Bahan Ajar ataupun Model Pembelajaran
• Media Pembelajaran Matematika
• Alat Peraga Pembelajaran Matematika
• Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Pembelajaran
• Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika
• Kurikulum Pendidikan Matematika
• Teori Belajar Matematika
• Sejarah dan Filsafat Matematika
• Analisis Penerapan Model/Pendekatan/Metode/Strategi Pembelajaran
• Media Pembelajaran berbasis IT
• Penelitian Tindakan Kelas
• Kreativitas dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika
• Lesson Study Pembelajaran Matematika

Khusus untuk hasil penelitian, metode penelitian yang digunakan dapat menggunakan penelitian kuantitatif, penelitian kualitatif, penelitian campuran, penelitian pengembangan, penelitian desain, ataupun jenis penelitian lainnya yang berkaitan dengan topik di atas.

Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Kebijakan review untuk Jurnal Fibonaci: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika

1. Setiap artikel yang masuk akan diterima dan diperiksa oleh Editor in Chief. Artikel yang scope dan format penulisannya masih tidak sesuai dengan kriteria jurnal ini, maka akan ditolak tanpa masuk lebih lanjut pada proses manajemen review.
2. Artikel yang sudah sesuai dengan kriteria jurnal akan diteruskan pada Section Editor untuk di proses lebih lanjut.
3. Editor Section akan menugaskan minimal dua reviewer tiap artikel, dengan kemungkinan langsung diterima/ diterima dengan sedikit revisi/ diterima dengan banyak revisi/ ditolak. Reviewer ketiga akan ditugaskan ketika terjadi kemungkinan diantara kedua reviewer memiliki keputusan yang berbeda.
4. Proses Review menggunakan Double Blind Review, artinya reviewer tidak mengetahui identitas penulis, dan penulis pun tidak mengetahui identitas reviewer.
5. Dalam proses review, reviewer melakukan kajian dan memberi pertimbangan terkait dengan kesesuaian antara judul, abstrak, metode, pembahasan (hasil temuan) dan kesimpulan. Selain itu, reviewer juga memberi pertimbangan terkait dengan kebaruan, dampak ilmiah, teori referensi kekinian, dan hasil temuan.
6. Hasil review dari kedua reviewer diterima oleh Section Editor untuk dikaji dan disampaikan kepada penulis, sebagai pertimbangan dan masukan untuk perbaikan.
7. Penulis merevisi artikel sesuai dengan masukan dan saran dari kedua reviewer. Setelah selesai, penulis menyerahkan kembali hasil revisi artikel pada Section Editor.
8. Section Editor menerima artikel hasil revisi untuk diperiksa similaritas atau unsur-unsur plagiasi dengan menggunakan Turnitin.
9. Jika hasil similaritas masih cukup besar, artikel dikembalikan kepada penulis untuk direvisi kembali. Setelah selesai, penulis menyerahkan kembali hasil revisi artikel pada Section Editor.
10. Editor Section memeriksa benar tidaknya revisi yang dilakukan oleh penulis. Jikalau sudah benar, Section Editor memberikan keputusan final apakah artikel diterima atau ditolak, berdasarkan perbaikan substansi dan manajemen artikel yang telah sesuai dengan kriteria artikel Jurnal Mosharafa.
11. Editor in Chief bersama dengan Section Editor memproses artikel-artikel yang diterima untuk dilanjutkan ke tahap proses editing dan publishing.
12. Fibonaci: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika tidak akan menggaransi atau menjanjikan keberterimaan suatu artikel atau proses review yang sangat singat kepada siapapun. Setiap artikel yang masuk, wajib mengikuti proses manajemen penerbitan artikel, dari mulai submit artikel sampai dengan artikel tersebut di publish.

Publication Frequency

Fibonaci: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika terbit tiga kali dalam satu tahun, yaitu pada bulan Juni, dan Desember

Open Access Policy

Fibonaci: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika memberikan akses terbuka langsung pada publik. Jurnal ini memiliki dengan prinsip untuk membuat seluruh artikel penelitian tersedia secara bebas sehingga dapat mendukung pertukaran pengetahuan global yang lebih besar.

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

Publication Ethics

Jurnal Fibonaci: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Jurnal Fibonaci: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society. 

Duties of Publisher

Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Medan as publisher of Jurnal Fibonaci: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Medan and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The editor of the Jurnal Fibonaci: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest 

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Plagiarism Checker

Any script sent to the manager will go through the plagiarism checker, Turnitin with maximal similarity 20%.

References Management

In writing Citation and Bibliography, editor journal suggests authors to use the Mendeley Reference Management Software.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Alamat Redaksi :

Jl. Williem Iskandar Pasar V Medan