THE STYLE OF INTROVERT AND EXTROVERT IN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY WRITING
Abstract
Writing is highly essential in school, especially in the English Department, since they must master the fundamentals of writing. Unfortunately, writing is considered as the most challenging of the four English language abilities. Numerous researches discovered that EFL students also experienced a variety of issues with academic writing. This issue must be handled carefully since it has an impact on the teachers’ ability to teach writing in the classroom. In order to overcome these issues, students' personalities must be understood. Students' personalities have a critical effect on their capacity to write. Introvert and extrovert are two personality characteristics that contribute to individual differences. This research used descriptive research where the participants were 8 students who took academic writing class. The students were given a personality questionnaire and the result showed 4 students were introvert and 4 others are extrovert. Then the students were given an annotated bibliography test to find the type and key elements of annotated bibliography used by the students. The writer found that the students used summative annotations and combined annotations. 1 introvert student uses combined annotation and 3 introvert students use summative annotation. Whereas for extrovert students, 2 people use combined annotation and 2 other people use summative annotation. Various obstacles experienced by the students thus effecting their academic writing.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Beatty, L., and C. A. Cochran. (2020). Writing the Annotated Bibliography: a Guide for Students and Researchers. Routledge.
Boroujeni, A. A. J., A. Roohani, and A. Hasanimanesh. (2015). The Impact of Extroversion and Introversion Personality Types on EFL Learners’ Writing Ability. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. DOI:10.17507/tpls.0501.29.
Chaplin, S. P. (2000). Dictionary of Psychology (terjemahan oleh Kartini Kartono). Rajawali Press: Jakarta.
Damayanti, R., Mulyadi, and B. Simaibang. (2021). Who are Your Students in Writing?. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(1). 2600 – 2609.
Darwish, A. S., and A. A. Sadeqi. (2016). Reasons for College Students to Plagiarizein EFL Writing: Students’ Motivation to Pass. International Education Studies, 9(9), 1-12.
Jung, C. G. (1961). Two Essays on Analytical Psychology. New York: Meridian
Hidayat, D. R. (2015). Teori dan Aplikasi Psikologi Kepribadian dalam Konseling. Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia: Bogor.
Hirsh, S. K., & Kummerow, J. M. (2009). LIFETypes. Hachette UK.
Hussain, S. S. (2019). Strategies for Teaching Academic Writing to Saudi L2 learners. English Language Teaching, 12(12), 1-11.
Kello, K. (2012). Sensitive and Controversial Issues in the Classroom: Teaching History in a Divided Society. Teachers and Teaching, 22(1), 35-53.
Nezhad, S.H., S. Jahandar and M. Khodabandehlou, (2014). The Impact of Extroversion Vs Introversion on Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing Ability. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences. 4(1). 11 – 128.
Ryckman, R. (2007). Theories of Personality. Amerika Serikat: Cengage Learning.
Suryabrata, S. (2002). Psikologi Kepribadian. Jakarta: Raja GrafindoPersada
Wulansari, S. (2011). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran dan Tipe Kepribadian terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika pada Siswa
SMP Swasta di Kecamatan Medan Area. JurnalTabularasa PPS Unimed, 9 (1).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/lt.v20i1.46631
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 170 timesPDF - 111 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Indri Octa Miransyah, Rahmad . Husein, Masitowarni . Siregar