Perceptions of Verbal Toxic Positivity in Academic Interactions: A Study among University Students

Authors

  • Ratri Harida STKIP PGRI Ponorogo`
  • Rizki Mustikasari STKIP PGRI Ponorogo
  • Lusy Novitasari STKIP PGRI Ponorogo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24114/altruistik.v5i1.64998

Keywords:

Academic, Interaction, Lecturer communication style, Verbal toxic positivity

Abstract

This research aims to explore students' perceptions of the phenomenon of verbal toxic positivity in academic interactions, particularly between lecturers and students. Toxic positivity is a form of communication that conveys positive messages excessively without considering the emotional context of the recipient, which can actually have a negative impact on mental health. Using a descriptive quantitative method, data were collected through questionnaires distributed to 81 students of the English Education Study Program at STKIP PGRI Ponorogo. The research results show that the most dominant form of verbal toxic positivity is in the form of advice and affirmation. The main triggering situation is the continuous repetition of those statements by the lecturer, especially when students are experiencing emotional stress. The psychological impacts most felt by students are low self-esteem, feelings of depression, and the inability to express emotions in a healthy way. These findings emphasize the importance of faculty awareness, both as educators and academic advisors, in building empathetic and adaptive communication to create an academic environment that supports students' mental well-being. This study also recommends the development of communication and student well-being training to avoid the practice of verbal toxic positivity in the context of academics and academic guidance.

Author Biographies

Ratri Harida, STKIP PGRI Ponorogo`

STKIP PGRI Ponorogo

Rizki Mustikasari, STKIP PGRI Ponorogo

STKIP PGRI Ponorogo

Lusy Novitasari, STKIP PGRI Ponorogo

STKIP PGRI Ponorogo

References

Abbas, A., Ekowati, D., Suhariadi, F., & Hamid, S. A. R. (2022). Negative vs positive psychology: A review of science of well-being. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 0123456789, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-022-09708-1

Abidin, K., & Wandi, W. (2023). Etika komunikasi antara mahasiswa dan dosen dalam interaksi akademik melalui media digital. Medialog: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 6(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.35326/medialog.v6i1.2672

Achmad, Z. A., & Lubna, P. N. C. (2023). Toxic positivity content uploads on Instagram in encouraging the growth of hustle culture Gen Z. JOSAR (Journal of Students Academic Research), 8(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.35457/josar.v9i1.2730

Astri, Z., & Fian, A. (2020). The sociolinguistics study on the use of code mixing in Gita Savitri Devi’s YouTube channel video. Seltics, 3(2), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.46918/seltics.v0i0.728

Bhat, M. M., Hosseini, S., Awadallah, A. H., Bennett, P. N., & Li, W. (2021). Say “yes” to positivity: detecting toxic language in workplace communications. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Findings of ACL: EMNLP 2021, 2017–2029. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.173

Bosveld, E. (2021). Positive vibes only: The downsides of a toxic cure-all (Issue January, pp. 1–8). https://sandberg.nl/media/document/original/positivevibesonly_evabosveld.pdf

Carl R. Rogers. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy (1st ed.). Houghton Mifflin Company.

Dweck, C. S. (2016). Mindset: the new psychology of success (2nd ed.). Random House.

Feltner, M. E. (2023). Toxic Positivity and Perceptions of Mental Health Toxic Positivity and Perceptions of Mental Health. Scholar Commons. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/senior_theses

Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (5th ed., Vol. 3, Issue 1). SAGE Publications.

Gonaga, S. (2023). Effect of positive affirmations on the academic self-efficacy, self-esteem, and personal wellbeing of high school students. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.25215/1103.215

Hafilia, M. P., & Priyambodo, A. B. (2022). Hubungan psychological capital dan psychological well-being saat penerapan pembelajaran daring pada siswa kelas IX SMP. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Dan Call for Paper Psikologi Dan Ilmu Humaniora (SENAPIH 2022), 2020, 146–164. https://conference.um.ac.id/index.php/psi/article/view/3162

Held, B. S. (2002). The tyranny of the positive attitude in America: Observation and speculation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(9), 965–991. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10093

Hidayat, I. (2021). Hubungan antara harga diri dengan kecemasan komunikasi pada mahasiswa yang mengalami toxic positifity di Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry. Skripsi. Repository UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh. https://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/id/eprint/19769

Indreswari, H., Probowati, D., & Rachmawati, I. (2022). Psychological well-being and student academic burnout. Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 7(3), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.17977/um001v7i32022p138-149

Kojongian, M. G. R., & Wibowo, D. H. (2022). Toxic positivity: Sisi lain dari konsep untuk selalu positif dalam segala kondisi. Psychopreneur Journal, 6(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.37715/psy.v6i1.2493

Lalufiansyah, R., & Ariyanto, M. S. (2023). Hubungan interaksi sosial dengan motivasi belajar pada mahasiswa. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 2(6), 2337–2345. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v2i6.1050

Lau Ung Mui, & Saili, J. (2024). Toxic positivity and its role among young adult workers. Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, 10(1), 50–71. https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.6437.2024

Lew, Z., & Flanagin, A. J. (2023). Toxic positivity on social media: The drawbacks and benefits of sharing positive (but potentially platitudinous) messages online. New Media & Society, 14614448231213944. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231213944

Novitasari, N. E. (2023). Hubungan antara toxic positivity dengan interaksi sosial di kalangan mahasiswa Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta. Skripsi. Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta. https://fud2.uinsaid.ac.id/akasia/index.php?p=show_detail&id=11828&keywords=

Nur Inah, E. (2015). Peran komunikasi dalam interaksi guru dan siswa. Al-Ta’dib, 8(2), 150–167. https://doi.org/10.31332/atdb.v8i2.416

Pangalila, T. (2017). Interaksi sosial dosen dan mahasiswa dalam proses perkuliahan di jurusan PPKn FIS UNIMA. PKN Progresif, 12(02), 699–706.

Perez, C. R., & Soto, J. A. (2011). Cognitive reappraisal in the context of oppression: Implications for psychological functioning. Emotion, 11(3), 675–680. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021254

Petrocchi, N., Ottaviani, C., & Couyoumdjian, A. (2017). Compassion at the mirror: Exposure to a mirror increases the efficacy of a self-compassion manipulation in enhancing soothing positive affect and heart rate variability. Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(6), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1209544

Praptiningsih, N. A., & Putra, G. K. (2021). Toxic relationship dalam komunikasi interpersonal di kalangan remaja. Communication, 12(2), 132. https://doi.org/10.36080/comm.v12i2.1510

Putra, R. P., Ramadhanti, A., Sasanti, A., Fadil, A., & Salsyabila, N. (2023). Toxic Positivity in Adolescents: An Attitude of Always Being Positive in Every Situation. Journal of Psychology and Instruction, 7(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpai.v7i1.60616

Putra, R. P., Ramadhanti, A., & Rizky, D. A. (2023). Gender differences in levels of toxic positivity in adolescents: A quantitative study. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 7(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v7i2.26624

Qian, J., ElSherief, M., Belding, E., & Wang, W. Y. (2019). Learning to decipher hate symbols. NAACL HLT 2019 - 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies - Proceedings of the Conference, 1, 3006–3015. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n19-1305

Rasool, S. F., Wang, M., Tang, M., Saeed, A., & Iqbal, J. (2021). How toxic workplace environment effects the employee engagement: The mediating role of organizational support and employee wellbeing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052294

Ripki, A. J. H., Nurlaelah, N., & Triyono, A. (2023). Pengaruh efikasi diri terhadap kreativitas guru. EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 1949–1954. https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v4i2.527

Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1992). Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being: Theoretical overview and empirical update. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16(2), 201–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173489

Schmidt, A., & Wiegand, M. (2017). A survey on hate speech detection using natural language processing. SocialNLP 2017 - 5th International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media, Proceedings of the Workshop AFNLP SIG SocialNLP, 2012, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w17-1101

Sokal, L., Trudel, L. E., & Babb, J. (2020). It’s okay to be okay too. Why calling out teachers “toxic positivity” may backfire. Education Canada, 60(3), 1–5. https://hdl.handle.net/10680/1873

Subiyakto, B., & Mutiani, M. (2019). Internalisasi nilai pendidikan melalui aktivitas masyarakat sebagai sumber belajar ilmu pengetahuan sosial. Khazanah: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Humaniora, 17(1), 137. https://doi.org/10.18592/khazanah.v17i1.2885

Sujarwo, Sukmawati, Asdar, & Ariani, N. (2020). University students ’ perception on the verbal interaction in WhatsApp Chat Group. AL-TA’LIM, 27(3), 250–257. https://dx.doi.org/10.15548/jt.v27i3.633

Upadhyay, I. S., Srivatsa, K. V. A., & Mamidi, R. (2022). Towards toxic positivity detection. SocialNLP 2022 - 10th International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media, Proceedings of the Workshop, SocialNLP, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.socialnlp-1.7

Waseem, Z., Davidson, T., Warmsley, D., & Weber, I. (2017). Understanding abuse: A typology of abusive language detection subtasks. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 78–84. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w17-3012

Wihardi, D., Kristanty, S., Daegaz Pangestu, K., Studi Ilmu Komunikasi, P., & Public Relations, P. (2024). Penerapan kegiatan employee relations dalam mempertahankan motivasi kerja karyawan PT Mandiri Tunas Finance di Jakarta. Jurnal Representamen, 10(01), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.30996/representamen.v10i01.10362

Wood, J. V., Elaine Perunovic, W. Q., & Lee, J. W. (2009). Positive self-statements: Power for some, peril for others. Psychological Science, 20(7), 860–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02370.x

Yuliasari, I., Zubaedah, I., & Permatasari, M. A. (2022). Pola interaksi dosen dan mahasiswa dalam sosialisasi dan implementasi program merdeka belajar kampus merdeka di universitas jayabaya. Jurnal Citra Fikom Jayabaya, 10(1), 1–9.

Zaifullah, Z., Cikka, H., & Kahar, M. I. (2021). Strategi guru dalam meningkatkan interaksi dan minat belajar terhadap keberhasilan peserta didik dalam menghadapi pembelajaran tatap muka di masa pandemi Covid 19. Guru Tua : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.31970/gurutua.v4i2.70

Downloads

Published

15-07-2025

How to Cite

Harida, R., Mustikasari, R., & Novitasari, L. (2025). Perceptions of Verbal Toxic Positivity in Academic Interactions: A Study among University Students. Altruistik : Jurnal Konseling Dan Psikologi Pendidikan, 5(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.24114/altruistik.v5i1.64998