Designing an English Speaking Module for 10th Grade on Descriptive Texts with a Project-Based Learning Framework at SMAS Cerdas Bangsa

Rifka Alfina

Abstract


This study aimed to develop a project-based learning module for speaking descriptive text at SMAS Cerdas Bangsa using the Research and Development (R&D) Method. The R&D process included six stages: information gathering, data analysis, module design, expert validation, revision, and final product development. Data were collected through interviews with an English teacher and student questionnaires to identify needs, wants, deficiencies, and current teaching methods. The module was designed based on these insights and validated by two experts, leading to revisions. The final English speaking module was created and concluded to be effective for teaching descriptive text. Validation scores averaged 93.75% across content (93%), presentation (94%), language (93%), and layout (95%), classifying the module as very good. It is recommended for use in Senior High School English classes, particularly for teaching descriptive text.


Keywords


Speaking, Descriptive Text, Project-Based Learning, Module

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andriadi, A., Fitraini, D., & Suhandri, S. (2018). Pengembangan Modul Matematika Berbasis Active Learning Untuk Memfasilitasi Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. JURING (Journal for Research in Mathematics Learning), 1(1), 55-64.

Borg, W. R., Gall, M. D. & Gall, J. P. 2003. Educational Research: An Introduction (7nd Ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon

Brown, H.D. 1994. Principles of language learning and teaching (3rd.ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Princeton Hall

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Longman.

Dakir. (2004). Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Kurikulum. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Davison and Dowson (2009) Teaching English Texts 11 – 18, by Sue Dymoke, Changing English, 17:1, 103-107, DOI: 10.1080/13586840903557126.

Daryanto dan Rahardjo, M. (2012). Model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1995). Making sense of text: The context-text relationship. Antipodean Educational Enterprises.

Jenkins, G. (2020). Teacher agency: the effects of active and passive responses to curriculum change. Australian Educational Researcher, (Vol.47, No. 1).

Kemendikburistek, 2021, Kurikulum Merdeka Sebagai Opsi Satuan Pendidikan dalam Rangka Pemulihan Pembelajaran Tahun 2022 s.d 2024. Accessed on 1st September 2023, https://kurikulum.gtk.kemdikbud.go.id/detail-ikm/

Kholik, E. N. (2021). Persiapan Pendidikan Menghadapi Era Merdeka Belajar. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Manajemen Pendidikan (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1299-1307).

Maipita, I., Dalimunthe, M. B., & Sagala, G. H. (2021). The Development Structure of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum in the Industrial Revolution Era. Proceedings of the International Conference on Strategic Issues of Economics, Business and, Education (ICoSIEBE 2020), 163. Atlantis Press.

Ministry of Education and Culture. (2019). Academic Studies: A Curriculum for Learning Recovery. Mulyasa, E. (2014). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kualitataif, RnD, dan Kuantitatif. Bandung: IKAPI




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/reg.v13i1.65622

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 9 times
PDF - 5 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Rifka Alfina

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
slot gacor slot