BAGAIMANA SIKAP DAN PENDEKATAN TRANSITIONAL NOVICE TERHADAP PENYELESAIAN MASALAH FISIKA?

Eko Sujarwanto; Ernita Susanti; Yanti Sofi Makiyah

doi:10.24114/jpf.v11i1.30602

BAGAIMANA SIKAP DAN PENDEKATAN TRANSITIONAL NOVICE TERHADAP PENYELESAIAN MASALAH FISIKA?

Eko Sujarwanto, Ernita Susanti, Yanti Sofi Makiyah

Abstract

Pembelajaran fisika memiliki tujuan agar mahasiswa mampu menerapkan konsep dan hukum fisika dalam proses penyelesaian masalah fisika. Belajar fisika dan menyelesaikan masalah fisika dipengaruhi sikap dan pendekatan mahasiswa pada masalah fisika. Selain novice dan expert, dalam penyelesaian masalah fisika terdapat istilah transitioning novice. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi sikap dan pendekatan yang digunakan oleh Transitioning novice jika dihadapkan pada masalah fisika. Survei cross-sectional dilakukan pada Sikap dan Pendekatan terhadap Penyelesaian Masalah. Sampel penelitian adalah 88 mahasiswa melalui teknik purposive sampling yaitu mahasiswa masuk dalam kategori transitioning novice. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah hasil adaptasi Attitude and Approach to Problem Solving (AAPS). Hasil survei dianalisis secara statistik deskriptif menggunakan persentase dan tabulasi data. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa responden menunjukkan ciri novice dan ciri expert dalam hal sikap dan pendekatan terhadap penyelesaian masalah fisika. Mahasiswa yang menjadi responden menunjukkan sedang berada pada fase transitional novice. Ciri transitional novice yang menonjol pada penelitian ini adalah cara pandang terhadap rumus fisika dan masalah fisika yang masih dianggap sebagai masalah matematis, keterbatasan dalam mengidentifikasi konsep, melakukan evaluasi terhadap proses penyelesaian masalah dan solusinya, dan berkolaborasi dalam penyelesaian masalah

Keywords

transitional novice; sikap dan pendekatan; penyelesaian masalah fisika

Full Text:

PDF

References

Balta, N., Mason, A. J., & Singh, C. (2016). Surveying Turkish high school and university students ’ attitudes and approaches to physics problem solving. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12 010129, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010129

Burkholder, E., Blackmon, L., & Wieman, C. (2020). Characterizing the mathematical problem-solving strategies of transitioning novice physics students. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), 20134. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020134

De Cock, M. (2012). Representation use and strategy choice in physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 020117. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020117

Docktor, J. L., Strand, N. E., Mestre, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2015). Conceptual problem solving in high school physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 020106, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020106

Fakcharoenphol, W., Morphew, J. W., & Mestre, J. P. (2015). Judgments of physics problem difficulty among experts and novices. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 020128, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020128

Fakcharoenphol, W., & Stelzer, T. (2014). Physics exam preparation : A comparison of three methods. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 010108, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010108

Greiff, S., Scheiter, K., Scherer, R., Borgonovi, F., Britt, A., Graesser, A., … Samuel Greiff, B. (2017). Adaptive problem solving: Moving towards a new assessment domain in the second cycle of PIAAC. In OECD Education Working Papers. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/90fde2f4-en

Hull, M. M., Kuo, E., Gupta, A., & Elby, A. (2013). Problem-solving rubrics revisited : Attending to the blending of informal conceptual and formal mathematical reasoning. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 010105, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.010105

Ibrahim, B., & Rebello, N. S. (2012). Representational task formats and problem solving strategies in kinematics and work. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 010126, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010126

Kuo, E., Hull, M. M., Gupta, A., & Elby, A. (2013). How students blend conceptual and formal mathematical reasoning in solving physics problems. Science Education, 97(1), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21043

Lin, S., & Singh, C. (2013). Using an isomorphic problem pair to learn introductory physics : Transferring from a two-step problem to a three-step problem. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 020114, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020114

Lin, X., Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. (2007). Intercultural adaptive expertise: Explicit and implicit lessons from Dr. hatano. Human Development, 50(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1159/000097686

Malone, K. L. (2008). Correlations among knowledge structures, force concept inventory, and problem-solving behaviors. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 4(2), 020107. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.020107

Mason, A., & Singh, C. (2010). Surveying graduate students ’ attitudes and approaches to problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 6 020124, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020124

Mason, A., & Singh, C. (2011). Assessing expertise in introductory physics using categorization task. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 020110, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020110

Milbourne, J., & Wiebe, E. (2018). The Role of Content Knowledge in Ill-Structured Problem Solving for High School Physics Students. Research in Science Education Education, 48, 165–179.

Riantoni, C., Yuliati, L., Mufti, N., & Nehru. (2017). Problem Solving Approach in Electrical Energy and Power on Students as Physics Teacher Candidates. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA IndonesiaFisika Indonesia, 6(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.8293

Rosengrant, D., Heuvelen, A. Van, & Etkina, E. (2005). FREE-BODY DIAGRAMS : NECESSARY OR SUFFICIENT ? In J. Marx, P. Heron, & S. Franklin (Eds.), 2004 Physics eduacation Research Conference (pp. 177–181). American Institute of Physics.

Rosengrant, D., Heuvelen, A. Van, & Etkina, E. (2009). Do students use and understand free-body diagrams ? Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 5(010108), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.010108

Sujarwanto, E., Hidayat, A., & Wartono. (2014). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika pada modeling instruction pada siswa sma kelas xi. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v3i1.2903

Sujarwanto, Eko, & Putra, I. A. (2018). Conception of Motion as Newton Law Implementation among Students of Physics Education. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 6(4), 110–119. Retrieved from http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jps/

Tuminaro, J., & Redish, E. F. (2007). Elements of a cognitive model of physics problem solving : Epistemic games. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 020101, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020101

Zhu, G., & Wang, J. (2017). Pseudolongitudinal investigation on Chinese students ’ categorization of kinematics and mechanics problems. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 020118, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020118

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpf.v11i1.30602

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 355 times
PDF - 355 times

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika
p-ISSN : 2252-732X | e-ISSN : 2301-7651
Organized by The Magister of Physics Education Departement in State University of Medan in collaboration with Physical Society of Indonesia (PSI)
W: https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/jpf/index
E : jpfunimed@unimed.ac.id
rajo.hasim@gmail.com (principal contact)

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Username
Password
Remember me