.png)
Analysis of final semester assessment questions (PAS) in grade XI chemistry online learning based on cognitive domain level of revised Bloom's taxonomy
Abstract
This study aims to determine the distribution of cognitive domain levels from Final Semester Assessment (PAS) questions in online learning chemistry grade XI based on the cognitive domain of Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. The method used is descriptive method with the instrument in the form of a check-list format. The object of this research is the question of PAS chemistry grade XI even semester in four schools in South Tangerang City. The data were obtained through analysis of the cognitive domain level of Revised Bloom's Taxonomy on each item and validated through triangulation techniques by two experts in the field of chemistry. The results showed each of the percentages for the C1 domain is 24.3%, the C2 domain is 32.9%, the C3 domain is 32.1%, the C4 domain is 10.7%, and the C5 and C6 domain are both 0%. This show that the distribution of cognitive domains on the chemistry PAS questions for grade XI was not evenly distributed, PAS questions were distributed in four domains out of a total of six cognitive domains, C1, C2, C3, and C4. There are no questions in the cognitive domains of C5 and C6.
Keywords:
Chemistry online learning, Final semester assessment, Question analysis, Revised Bloom’s taxonomy
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adhani, A., & Ilma, S. (2017). Efektivitas strategi pembelajaran brain-based learning terhadap keterampilan metakognitif. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 8(2), 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/quantum.v8i2.4007
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. 2010. Kerangka landasan untuk pembelajaran, pengajaran, dan asesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Büken, R., & Artvinli, E. (2021). Analysis of geography attainments in the social sciences curriculum of turkey according to the revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Romanian Review of Geographical Education, 10(2), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.23741/rge220215
Dempster, E. R. (2012). Comparison of exit-level examinations in four African countries. Journal of Social Sciences, 33(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2012.11893086
Effendi, R. (2015). Konsep revisi taksonomi bloom dan implementasinya pada pelajaran matematika SMP. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 72-78. https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v2i1.1483
Fanani, M. Z. (2018). Strategi pengembangan soal HOTS pada kurikulum 2013. Edudeena, 2(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.30762/ed.v2i1.582
Fitriyani, Y., Fauzi, I., & Sari, M. Z. S. (2020). Motivasi belajar mahasiswa pada pembelajaran daring selama pandemik covid-19. Jurnal Kependidikan, 6(2), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v6i2.2654
Gasela, Y., Sidauruk, S., & Fatah, A. H. (2020). Kualitas soal penilaian akhir semester (PAS) buatan guru mata pelajaran kimia kelas XI MIA SMA di kabupaten Kotawaringin barat pada semester ganjil tahun ajaran 2018/2019. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang, 11(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.37304/jikt.v11i1.72
Gunawan, I., & Palupi, A. R. (2012). Taksonomi Bloom - revisi ranah kognitif: Kerangka landasan untuk pembelajaran, pengajaran, dan asesmen. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran, 2(2), 98–117. http://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v2i02.50
Hasanah, I., Copriady, J., & Thaib, A. (2015). Analisis butir soal ujian semester ganjil pelajaran kimia kelas XI IPA SMA negeri 10 Pekanbaru tahun pelajaran 2013 / 2014. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Riau, 2(1), 1–10.
Kemendikbud. (2019). Buku penilaian berorientasi higher order thinking skill. Direktorat Jendral Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan.
Kenni, A. M. (2020). Analysis of students’ performance in chemistry in the west African senior school certificate examination (WASSCE) and national examination council (NECO) from 2015-2018. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 7(1), 35-49.
Kurniawan, Y. N., Zulfadli, & Adhani, A. (2021). Analisis penilaian akhir semester pada mata pelajaran biologi kelas X berdasarkan taksonomi Anderson di SMA Negeri 1 Tarakan. Borneo Journal of Biology Education, 3(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.35334/bjbe.v3i1.1887
Laila, I., & Fitriyah, I. (2022). An analysis of reading comprehension questions in english textbook based on revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Journal of English Teaching, 8(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v8i1.3394
Maureen, J., & Salirawati, D. (2016). Analyzing the quality of chemistry final odd semester examination of the XII grade senior high school in special region of Yogyakarta. Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia, 5(6), 1–7.
Mulatsih, B. (2021). Penerapan taksonomi Bloom revisi pada pengembangan soal kimia ranah pengetahuan. Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 6(1), 1–10.
Mutmainah, S., & Muchlis, M. (2022). Implementation of assessment for learning to improve students’ cognitive learning outcomes in the concept of chemical bonding. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(2), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i2.3308
Nurrada, A. (2021). Kualitas soal penilaian akhir semester (PAS) buatan guru mata pelajaran kimia kelas X MIA SMA di Kabupaten Kotawaringin Barat pada semester ganjil tahun ajaran 2018/2019. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang, 12(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.37304/jikt.v12i1.121
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and analytical framework. in OECD Publishing.
Pantiwati, Y., & Permana, H. (2017). Analisis butir soal oleh mahasiswa s1 pendidikan biologi Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang (UMM) berdasarkan taksonomi Bloom revisi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kedua Pendidikan Berkemajuan dan Menggembirakan, p. 707–716.
Peraturan Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan No. 24 Tahun 2016 Lampiran 9 Tentang Kompetensi Isi dan Kompetensi Dasar Kimia SMA/MA. (n.d.).
Permatasari, A., Wartono, & Kusairi, S. (2017). Analisis kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa SMA. Prosiding Seminar Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM, p. 2.
Prabayanti, N. M. D., Sudiana, I. K., & Wiratini, N. M. (2018). Analisis tes ulangan kenaikan kelas buatan guru mata pelajaran kimia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 2(1), 25–31.
Purba, R. A. B., Susanti, N., & Rosna. (2018). Analisis butir soal ujian semester ganjil kimia kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Perbaungan. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 1(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.24114/jipk.v1i1.12536
Putra, I. B. T., & Ritonga, P. S. (2017). Analisis butir soal ujian semester ganjil pelajaran kimia kelas X di SMA / MA Sekecamatan Pekaitan. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia dan Terapan, 1(1), 25–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/konfigurasi.v1i1.4051
Putra, S. R. (2013). Desain evaluasi belajar berbasis kinerja. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.
Ramlawati, Anwar, M., Yunus, S. R., & Nuswowati, M. (2020). Analysis of students’ competence in chemistry cognitive test construction based on revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(4), 042006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/4/042006
Sandra-G, C. E. S., Rery, R. U., & Herdini. (2017). Analysis of second semester exam questions in chemistry class XII MIA SMA Negeri 1 Tapung Academic Year 2016 / 2017. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Riau, 4(2), 1–13.
Silaban, S. (2021). Pengembangan program pengajaran. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Siahaan, R., Sitorus, M., & Silaban, S. (2021). The development of teaching materials oriented to critical thinking skills for chemistry class XI high school. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 13(1), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v13i1.24145
Sudarsana, K. N. A., Antara, P. A., & Dibia, I. K. (2020). Kelayakan instrumen penilaian keaktifan belajar PPKn. Jurnal Mimbar PGSD Undiksha, 8(2), 150–158.
Syahida, A., & Irwandi, D. (2015). Analisis keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi pada soal ujian nasional kimia. Edusains, 7(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v7i1.1404
Syani, I., Sidauruk, S., & Meiliawati, R. (2019). Kualitas soal penilaian akhir semester (PAS) buatan guru mata pelajaran kimia kelas XI IPA SMA di Kabupaten Barito Timur pada semester ganjil tahun ajaran 2018/2019. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang, 10(2), 282–299. https://doi.org/10.37304/jikt.v10i2.38
Tuna, S., & Kapucu, M. S. (2022). Analysis of high school entrance exam (LGS) questions in terms of PISA scientific literacy. Journal of STEAM Education, 5(1), 31–54.
Ulum, Ö. G. (2022). Is the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Revisited in the EFL/ESL Reading Textbooks?. OPUS Journal of Society Research, 19(45), 170-177. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1062878
Upahi, J. E., Issa, G. B., & Oyelekan, O. S. (2015). Analysis of senior school certificate examination chemistry questions for higher-order cognitive skills. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(3), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v1i1.67
Wahyuni, E. S., Khaldun, I., & Sulastri. (2017). Analisis soal-soal ujian materi stoikiometri SMA negeri kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 5(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v5i2.9820
Yonelia, V., Haryati, S., & Azmi, J. (2014). Analisis butir soal ujian semester genap mata pelajaran kimia kelas X IPA SMA PGRI Pekanbaru tahun ajaran 2013 / 2014. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Riau, 2(1), 1–25.
Zorluoglu, S. L., Kizilaslan, A., & Yapucuoglu, M. D. (2020). The Analysis of 9th Grade Chemistry Curriculum and Textbook According to Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v15i1.3516
Zorluoğlu, S. L., & Kızılaslan, A. (2019). Analysis of 10th chemistry curriculum according to revised Bloom taxonomy. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 6(2), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2019.62.88.95
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v14i1.30847
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 337 timesPDF - 223 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Tika Reformatika Fuadi, Evi Sapinatul Bahriah, Salamah Agung
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia
Contact: +62 853-1769-2813
Email: jpkim.pps@unimed.ac.id
Jl. Willem Iskandar, Pasar V, Medan Estate, Medan City, North Sumatra Province, Postal Code 20221. Phone/fax: (061) 661 3365 / +62 852-7802-1981.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.