The influence of the LSLC-based GIL learning model on the material of electrolysis cells on the learning outcomes of class XII students of SMA N 5 Padang

Rahil Ramadani, Andromeda Andromeda, Yemmi Suriati


This research is motivated by the not optimal learning model used by educators. To overcome this problem, a Lesson Study for Learning Community (LSLC) is implemented, there are 3 stages (Plan, Do and See) in one cycle. The role of the observer in the LSLC will have an impact on increasing the competence of educators, which will affect the learning process and increase student learning outcomes. The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of the LSLC-based Guided Inquiry Learning Model on the Electrolysis Cell material on the learning outcomes of class XII students of SMA N 5 Padang. The type of research is Quasi Experiment with Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. The study population was class XII students of SMA N 5 Padang and samples of class XII MIPA 1 and XII MIPA 3. Data were analyzed using the N-gain test, normality test, homogeneity test, and hypothesis testing (t-test). Based on the results of the study, the influence of the LSLC-based Guided Inquiry Learning (GIL) learning model, the results of the N-gain value analysis (g = 0.63) stated that the LSLC-based GIL learning model had moderate criteria. This shows that the LSLC-based GIL learning model is effective in improving student learning outcomes. This is evidenced by the increase in learning outcomes by 32.97%, the sample data is normally distributed, the two research samples are homogeneous, the hypothesis test is obtained tcount (2.04) and ttable (1.994), it can be concluded that Ho is rejected because tcount is greater than ttable.


Electrolysis cells, GIL, LSLC, Learning Outcomes

Full Text:



Andromeda, A., Yerimadesi, Y., & Iwefriani, I. (2017). Pengembangan lembaran kerja siswa (lks) ekperimen berbasis guided-inquiry materi laju reaksi untuk siswa SMA /MA. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (Jep), 1(1), 47-54.

Arikunto, S. (2012). Prosedur penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Asda, V. D., & Andromeda, A. (2021). Efektivitas e-modul berbasis guided inquiry learning terintegrasi virlabs dan multirepresentasi pada materi larutan elektrolit dan non elektrolit terhadap hasil belajar siswa. EDUKATIF: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(3), 710-716.

Barthlow, M. J., & Watson, S. B. (2014). The effectiveness of process‐oriented guided inquiry learning to reduce alternative conceptions in secondary chemistry. School Science and Mathematics, 114(5), 246-255.

Gabel, D. L., Samuel, K. V., & Hunn, D. (1987). Understanding the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(8), 695–697.

Latisma, DJ. (2011). Evaluasi pendidikan. Padang: UNP Press.

Lewis, C., Perry, R., Hurd, J., & O'Connell, M. P. (2006). Lesson study comes of age in North America. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(4), 273-281.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.

Hanson, D. M. (2006). Instructor’s guide to process-oriented guided-inquiry learning. Lisle, IL: Pacific Crest.

Nasution, R., Silaban, S., & Sudrajat, A. (2018). The influence of problem based learning, guided inquiry learning models assited by lectora inspire, and scientific attitudes to student’s cognitive values. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 200, 265-269.

Saifudin, A. (2018). Metode data mining untuk seleksi calon mahasiswa pada penerimaan mahasiswa baru di Universitas Pamulang. Jurnal Teknologi, 10(1), 25-36.

Saito, E., Murase, M., Tsukui, A., & Yeo, J. (2015). Lesson study for learning community. New York: Routledge

Santoso, S. (2012). Panduan lengkap SPSS Versi 20. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo

Schafer, A. G., Borland, V. M., & Yezierski, E. J. (2021). Visualizing chemistry teachers’ enacted assessment design practices to better understand barriers to “best practices”. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(2), 457-475.

Sudirtha, I. G. (2017). Membangun learning community dan peningkatkan kompetensi melalui Lesson Study. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(1), 28-38.

Sudjana, N. (2005). Metoda statistika. Bandung: Tarsito.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D.Bandung: Alfabeta.

Susilo, H. (2009). Upaya membelajarkan guru IPA/Biologi masa depan yang cerdas dan profesional. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Trilling, B. , & Fadel, C. ( 2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. New York, NY: John Wiley.

Vermunt, J. D., Vrikki, M., van Halem, N., Warwick, P., & Mercer, N. (2019). The impact of Lesson Study professional development on the quality of teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 81(1), 61-73.

Yusuf, A. M. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif & penelitian gabungan. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Yudha, S., Saputra, O. A., Purwanto, R., Nugraha, A. W., & Silaban, S. (2021). Analysis of chemical teaching materials for class X SMA/MA on the discussion of the role of chemistry in daily life. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 10(3), 109-117.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 223 times
PDF - 195 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2022 Rahil Ramadani, Andromeda Andromeda, Yemmi Suriati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia
Contact: +62 853-1769-2813

Jl. Willem Iskandar, Pasar V, Medan Estate, Medan City, North Sumatra Province, Postal Code 20221. Phone/fax: (061) 661 3365 / +62 852-7802-1981.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.