10.png)
The Effect of Realistic Mathematics Education Learning Model on Students’ Triarchic Intelligence
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the effect of the Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) learning model on students' triarchic intelligence. This study is a quasi-experiment with a pretest-posttest control design. The instruments used in this study were: (1) validation sheets; and (2) students' triarchic intelligence tests. The results of this study are: (1) the students' triarchic intelligence scores taught with the RME learning model are in the high category; (2) there is a significant difference on the students' triarchic intelligence scores taught by the RME learning model and direct learning; (3) the students' triarchic intelligence scores taught by the RME learning model is higer than the students' triarchic intelligence scores taught by direct learning; and (4) the implementation of the RME learning model can increase students' triarchic intelligence.
Keywords: Quasi-Experiment, Learning Model, RME, Triarchic Intelligence
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anwar, B. & Mumthas, N. S. 2014. Taking Triarchic Teaching to Classrooms: Giving Everybody a Fair Chance. International Journal of Advanced Research, 2(5): 455–458.
Bishop, A. J. 1991. Mathematical Enculturation: A Cultural Perspektive on Mathematics Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bozkurt, G. 2017. Social Constructivism: Does it Succeed in Reconciling Individual Cognition with Social Teaching and Learning Practices in Mathematics?. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(3).
Budinski, N. & Milinkovic, D. 2017. Transition from Realistic to Real World Problems with The Use of Technology in Elementary Mathematical Education. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 10(1).
Carpenter, J. & Gorg, S. 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. USA: NCTM, Inc.
Davidson, J. E. & Kemp, I. A.. 2011. Contemporary Models of Intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds). The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence (pp. 58 – 82). United State of America: Cambridge University Press.
Ernest, P. 1991. The Philosophy of Mathematics Education. Taylor & Francis Group: Routledge Falmer.
Farsani, S. G.; Heidari, K.; Pourbafrani, M.; Jafari, Z.; & Farsani, A. G. 2016. A Case Study of the Role of Intelligence in Learning and Success. International Academic Journal of Humanities, 3(4): 1 – 12.
Gillies, R. M. 2014. Cooperative Learning: Developments in Research. IJEP – International Journal of Educational Psychology, 3(2): 125-140.
Glasersfeld, E. von. 1995. Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning. London: Taylor & Francis.
Gravemeijer, K. 1994. Developing Realistic Mathematics Education. Utrecht: Institute.
Hake, R. R. 2008. Design-Based Research in Physics Education: A Review. In A. E. Kelly; R. A. Lesh; & J. Y. Baek. Handbook of Design Research Methods in Education: Innovations in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning and Teaching (pp. 493–508). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
Hasratuddin. 2017. Improving Critical Thinking and Emotional Intelligence Capabilities of Secondary School Students Through Realistic Mathematics Education Approach. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics, 5(1).
Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. van den. 2003. The Didactical Use of Models in Realistic Mathematics Education: An Example From a Longitudinal Trajectory on Percentage. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54: 9–35.
Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. van den & Drijvers, P. 2014. Realistic Mathematics Education. In S. Lerman (Ed). 2014. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 521–525). Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media.
Hidayat, R. & Iksan, Z. H. 2015. The Effect of Realistic Mathematic Education on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Linear Progamming. Creative Education, 6: 438-2445.
Jupri, A. & Drijvers, P. 2016. Student Difficulties in Mathematizing Word Problems in Algebra. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(9): 2481-2502.
Laal, M.; Geranpaye, L.; & Daemi, M. 2013. Individual Accountability in Collaborative Learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93: 286–289.
Momani, R. T. H. & Gharaibeh, S. A. 2017. Investigating the Construct Validity of Sternberg’s Triarchic Abilities Test Level-H (Arabic Version). International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 4(11): 28-34.
Mullis, I. V. S. & Martin, M. O. (Eds). 2013. TIMSS 2015 Assessment Frameworks. United States: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
Nelissen, J. & Tonic, W. 1993. Learning and Thought Processes in Realistic Mathematics Instruction. Curriculum and Teaching, 8(1).
OECD. 2016. PISA 2015: Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing.
Presmeg, N. 2003. Creativity, Mathematizing, and Didactizing: Leen Streefland’swork Continues. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54: 127–137.
Shabnam. 2014. Culture and Intelligence. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 2(1).
Slavin, R. E. 2008. Cooperative Learning, Success for All, and Evidence-Based Reform in Education. Education & Didactique, 2(2): 151–159.
Slavin, R. E. 2014. Cooperative Learning and Academic Achievement: Why Does Groupwork Work?. anales de psicología, 30(3): 785-791.
Sternberg, R. J. 1997. Successful Intelligence: How Practical and Creative Intelligence Determine Success in Life. New York: Plume.
Sternberg, R. J. 1999. Successful Intelligence: finding a balance. New York: Cambridge University Press. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(11).
Sternberg, R. J. 2005. The Theory of Successful Intelligence. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 39(2): 189–202.
Surya, E. & Syahputra, E. 2017. Improving High – Level Thinking Skills by Development of Learning PBL Approach on the Learning Mathematics for Senior High School Students. International Education Studies, 10(8).
Widjaja, Y. B. & Heck, A. 2003. How a Realistic Mathematics Education Approach and Microcomputer – Based Laboratory Worked in Lessons on Graphing at an Indonesian Junior High School. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 26(2): 1–51.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/paradikma.v16i1.43414
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 132 timesPDF - 75 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Published By: Study Program of Mathematics Education Postgraduate Program of UNIMED  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License | Visit us at:
|
