MEMINIMALKAN MISKONSEPSI PADA TOPIK GAYA, USAHA DAN ENERGI DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN SMARTPHONE

. Mursalin

Abstract


Artikel hasil penelitian eksperimen ini mendeskripsikan tentang upaya untuk meningkatan pemahaman konsep peserta didik dan meminimalkan miskonsepsi siswa pada topik Gaya, Usaha dan Energi dengan menggunakan smartphone android. Penelitian ini menggunakan rancangan kelompok dengan model pretest-posttest control group design. Subyek penelitian sebanyak 30 orang peserta didik kelas eksperimen dan 30 orang peserta didik kelas kontrol dari suatu sekolah di Gorontalo yang ditentukan dengan teknik cluster random sampling. Instrumen pengumpul data yang digunakan adalah tes pilihan ganda dengan alasan terbuka. Analisis data pretest-posttest dilakukan dengan menggunakan uji beda rerata gain ternormalisasi sedangkan analisis profil konsepsi peserta didik dilakukan dengan teknik Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Hasil penelitian menujukkan bahwa penerapan model pembelajaran smartphone lebih efektif meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan meminimalkan miskonsepsi peserta didik.


Keywords


Miskonsepsi, Gaya, Usaha dan Energi, Smart-phone

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L. W & Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Taxonomy for Learning Teaching and Assessing. A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Education Objectives. New York : Addision Wesley.

Cataloglu, E & Ates, S. (2014). The effects of cognitive styles on naive ımpetus theory application degrees of preservice science teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 699-719.

Chang, H., Chen, J., Guo, C., Chen, C., Chang, C., Lin, s., Su, W., Lain, K., Hsu, S., Lin, J., Cheng, Y., Wang, L., & Tseng, Y.(2007). Investigating Primary and Secondary Students’ Learning of Physics Concepts in Taiwan.

International Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 523 – 482.

Chuang, Y.T. (2014). Increasing Learning Motivation and Student Engegement through the Technology-Support Learning Enviroment. Creative Education, 1969-1978.

Cohen, L & Manion, L,. 1994. Research Methods in Education, Fourth Edition. London and New York : Routledge.

Corpuz, E.G & Rebello, N.S. (2006). Students’ Conceptual Development in the Context of Microscopic Friction: A Case Study with Two Students. Proceeding of the NARST 2006 Annual Meeting San Francisco, CA, United States.

Dahar, R.W. 1996. Teori-Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Demirci, N. & Cirkinoglu, A. (2004). Determining Students’ Preconceptions/ Misconceptions in Electricity and Magnetism. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Volume 2, Issue 2, Desember 2004. (Online): Tersedia:http://www.tused.org.

Frederick, H. (2017). Factors Influencing the Youth in Brand Switching of Smartphones. Research Paper. EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review; 5(2)(2017); e-ISSN: 2347 – 9671; p-ISSN : 2349 – 0187.

Gardner, H. (1999). The Dicipline Mind: What All Students Should

Understand. New York : Simon & Schuster Inc.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive Engagement Versus Tradisional Methods: A Six Thousand Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data For Introductory Physics Course. American. Journal of Physics, 66 (1): 64-74.

Halloun, I. B., & Hestenes, D. (1985). Common Sense Concepts About

Motion. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1056 – 1065.

Hammer, D. (1996). More Than Misconceptions: Multiple Perspectives

on Student Knowledge and Reasoning and an Appropriate Role for

Education Research. Am. Journal Physics, 64(10), 1316 – 1325.

Hasan, S., Bagayoko, D., Kelley, E. L. (1999). Misconceptions and The Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Physical Education, 34 (5): 294-299.

Hess, S. (2014). Digital Media and Student Learning: Impact of Electronic Books on Motivation and Achievement. New England Reading Association Journal, 49(2), 35-39.

Indrawati. (1997). Penggunaan Bridging Analogy untuk Remedi Beberapa Konsep Fisika Siswa SMA. Tesis Magister tidak dipublikasikan. Bandung: Program Pascasarjana IKIP Bandung.

İpec, H & Çalık, M. (2008). Combining Different Conceptual Change Methods within Four-Step Constructivist Teaching Model: A Sample Teaching of Series and Parallel Circuits. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education Vol. 3, No.3.

Mc-Dermott et al, L. C., Rosenquist, M. L., & van Zee, E. H. (1987). Student difficulties in Connecting graphs and Physics: Examples from Kinematics. American Journal of Physics, 55, 503 –513.

McLaughlin, C. A. & MacFadden B. J. (2014). At the Elbows of Scientists: Shaping Science Teachers’ Conceptions and Enactment of Inquiry-Based

Instruction. Research in Science Education, 44(6), 927-947.

Meister, J. (2011). The Year of the Media Tablet as a Learning Tool. Proquest, 65(4), 28-31.

Murray, T; Schultz, K; Brown, D; dan Clement, J. (1990). An Analogy-Based Computer Tutor for Remediating Physics Misconceptions.Interactive Learning Enviroments, Volume 1, 79-101.

Mursalin. (2013). Model Remediasi Miskonsepsi Materi Rangkaian Listrik

dengan Pendekatan Simulasi PhET. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia,

(1) (2013), 1-7.

Mursalin. (2014). Meminimalkan Miskonsepsi Pada Materi Rangkaian Listrik Dengan Pembelajaran PredictObserve-Explain. Jurnal Ilmu

Pendidikan, Jilid 20, Nomor 1, 94-99.

Potgieter, M., Malatje, E., Gaigher, E., &Venter, E. (2010). Confidence versus Performance as an Indicator of the Presence of Alternative Conceptions and Inadequate Problem-Solving Skills in Mechanics. International Journal of Science Education, 32(11), 1407-1429.

Prasetyo, Z.K. 2001. Kapita Selekta Pembelajaran Fisika. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Solas, E. C. & Wilson, K. (2017). Instructor’s use of student-generated annotated concept sketches in formative assessment in general science. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 144-161.

Sugiyono. (2006). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan; Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sunarno, W. (1998). Model Remediasi Miskonsepsi Dinamika

Menggunakan Animasi Simulasi dengan Komputer. Disertasi (tidak dipublikasikan). Bandung : Program Pascasarjana IKIP Bandung.

Suparno, P. (2005). Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan Konsep Pendidikan Fisika. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Sutopo, Lilisari, Waldrip, B., & Rusdiana, D. (2012). Impact of Representational Approach on the Improvement of Students’ Understanding of Acceleration. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 8(2), 161-173.

Sutopo (2016). Students’ Understanding of Fundamental Concepts of Mecanical Wave. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 12(1), 41-53.

Van den Berg, E. (1991). Miskonsepsi Fisika dan Remediasinya. Salatiga: Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.

Wahyudi, A. (2017). Indonesia, Raksasa Teknologi Digital Asia.

http://katadata.co.id/ analisisdata/2017/01/24. Diakses: 19

Agustus 2018.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpbp.v25i1.15531

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 128 times
PDF - 832 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 JURNAL PENELITIAN BIDANG PENDIDIKAN

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.