Peer Review Process

An editor first reviews the submitted manuscript. Next, the office will evaluate whether it suits our focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw. Every submitted manuscript which passes this step will be checked to identify any plagiarism before being reviewed. This journal uses a double-blind review in two rounds. First round, two reviewers will review the content of the submitted article in the general. This reviewed article will be sent back to the author through section editor for revising. Reviewers' comments are also sent anonymously to the corresponding author to take the necessary actions and responses. The author should send back the revised version of their article to get reviewed in the next round. In the second round here, the revised article will be reviewed again to make sure its quality content prior to the publication. Finally, the revised manuscript's decision will be evaluated in an editorial board meeting, based on the reviewer's recommendation from several possibilities: rejected, require major revision, need minor revision, or accepted. The Editor-in-Chief of Paedagogi: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan (e-journal) has the right to decide which manuscripts submitted to the journal should be published.