Otoritas Nilai Guru pada Sekolah Menengah di Era Digital

Authors

  • Ida Mariani Pasaribu Universitas Sari Mutiara Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Osberth Sinaga Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Wildansyah Lubis Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24114/paedagogi.v11i2.69571

Keywords:

Otoritas Nilai Guru, Filsafat Manajemen Pendidikan, Literasi Moral Digital

Abstract

This research aims to analyse the transformation of teachers’ values of authority in the digital era, characterised by shifts in social interaction patterns and the spread of media culture. As technology and digital communities help students construct their own value horizons, teachers are no longer the sole sources of moral legitimacy. This study investigates how the Dialogic Value Authority Model can strengthen teachers’ moral legitimacy by focusing on five key dimensions: relationality, dialogic legitimacy, sustainability of moral dialogue, digital ethics, and the design of hybrid learning spaces. The findings indicate that teachers who internalise these five dimensions are able to restore students’ moral trust through equitable relationships and reflective communication. Practically, the study recommends reforming teacher training policies toward digital moral literacy and establishing digital ethics policies in schools. Theoretically, it integrates the concept of reflective authority into the philosophy of educational management, positioning teachers as moral facilitators and value managers. In this age of computers and the internet, the proposed model offers a new approach to managing education that is moral, inclusive, and contextually responsive.

References

Bush, T., Bell, L., & Middlewood, D. (2019). Educational management: Theory, practice, and ethics. London: Sage Publications.

Bush, T., Bell, L., & Middlewood, D. (2019). Moral leadership and ethical management in education: A reappraisal in digital contexts. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(6), 945–962. London: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219858423

Campbell, J. (2024). The moral implications of mobile device bans in schools: A philosophical perspective. Journal of Educational Ethics, 39(2), 211–227. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2024.0123456

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and the ethics of reflexivity in education research. Educational Researcher, 47(3), 153–166. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17726832

Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a culture of change revisited: Moral purpose in digital schools. Journal of Educational Change, 21(4), 457–474. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09377-1

Fullan, M. (2020). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action and education reform. Philosophy of Education Journal, 12(1), 45–66. Boston: Beacon Press.

Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action, Vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press.

Hietanen, L., Laru, J., & Järvelä, S. (2023). Shared inquiry and reflective dialogue in digital learning communities. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–104. Oslo: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2043985

Kobayashi, K. (2022). Digital moral reflection and trust in Japanese high schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(3), 325–340. Singapore: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2022.2040083

Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2023). Digital ethics and the moral dimension of teachers’ professional identity. Computers & Education, 195(1), 104–121. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104676

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Nucci, L., Krettenauer, T., & Thompson, R. (2024). Dialogical approaches in moral and character education: Implications for the digital era. Journal of Moral Education, 53(1), 15–33. London: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2024.1234567

Raharjo, S., Nugroho, A., & Hidayat, R. (2022). Online learning and the shifting authority of teachers in Indonesia during COVID-19. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 67–81. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Press. https://doi.org/10.21009/ijer.052.07

Scheler, M. (1921). Formalism in ethics and non-formal ethics of values. Berlin: Niemeyer Verlag.

Sergiovanni, T. J. (2020). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Tang, Y. (2024). Dialogical assessment and moral reasoning in digital classrooms. Journal of Digital Education and Society, 16(2), 115–132. Hong Kong: Education Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/26938415.2024.1239876

Tilaar, H. A. R. (2002). Perubahan sosial dan pendidikan: Pengantar pedagogik transformatif untuk Indonesia. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Trevisan, O., Bellini, F., & Moretti, C. (2024). Continuous professional learning for teachers in digital environments: Moral and epistemic implications. Teaching and Teacher Education, 135(4), 104–129. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104179

Wegerif, R., & Major, L. (2024). The dialogic mind: Education, technology, and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31