Publication Ethics

Introduction

A ‘code of conduct’ that outlines the desired behavior and obligations of members of the scientific profession is needed for the publication of an article in a peer-reviewed journal. Such a code of conduct attempts to optimize the advantages of science to society and the profession. The advancement of science necessitates the sharing of knowledge, even though the recipient may sometimes forego any immediate personal advantage.

Publishing scientific research in journals is one of the fundamental ways that Jurnal Kewarganegaraan serves the Civics and Citizenship education community. For this purpose, editors, reviewers, writers, and publishers must maintain high ethical standards regarding manuscripts in the Jurnal Kewarganegaraan.

Editors

Editors have the following responsibilities:

To decide which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. Editors are accountable and responsible for everything they publish.
The decision to accept or reject a manuscript for publication is based solely on the manuscript's importance, originality, clarity, and relevance to the journal.
The aim is to acknowledge receipt of submitted manuscripts and to ensure the fair, efficient, and timely review process of submitted manuscripts.
To assess manuscripts for the intellectual subject matter disregarding race, gender, religious belief, sexual orientation, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
To guarantee that submitted manuscripts are handled in a confidential manner, with no details being disclosed to anyone, except for the reviewers, without the permission of the author until a decision has been taken as to whether the manuscript is to be published.
Not unveil any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone excluding the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Not to use the work reported in unpublished submitted articles for their research.
It is necessary to respond to any suggestions of scientific misconduct or to convincing evidence that the main substance or conclusions of a published manuscript are mistaken, usually through consultation with the author. This may necessitate the publication of a formal withdrawal or amendment.
To determine rationally responsive measures when ethical objections have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper in association with the publisher (or society).

Reviewers

Reviewers should:

They only agree to review manuscripts for which they have the subject expertise required to conduct an appropriate evaluation and that they can assess promptly.
Acknowledge that peer review is a reciprocal effort and undertake to conduct their fair share of reviewing on time.
Be objective and constructive in their reviews, abstaining from being hostile and from making offensive personal remarks.
Have a non-influenced review, neither by the author’s nationality, religious or political beliefs, gender, or other characteristics of the authors nor by commercial considerations.
Treat any manuscripts received for review as confidential documents. Only the editor's authorization is required to show or discuss them with others.
Information obtained during the peer-review process should not be used for their own or any other person’s or organization’s advantage or to disadvantage or discredit others.
Recognize relevant published work that has not been referred to by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be completed by a pertinent reference.
List all potential conflicts of interest and seek advice from the journal if you're unsure whether something qualifies as a relevant interest.

Authors

Authors have the following responsibilities:

To present a report of the research that has been conducted ethically and responsibly.
To present their results, truthfully, and without fraudulent, misrepresentation or improper data manipulation.
To provide, if needed, the unprocessed data in connection with a paper for editorial review.
To ensure that the work they submitted is original. If the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or referred. Plagiarism in all its forms comprises unethical publishing manners and is intolerable.
To describe their methods clearly and explicitly so that their findings can be confirmed by others.
Take collective responsibility for submitted and published work.
The authorship of research publications should precisely reveal individuals’ contributions to the work and its reporting.
To disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
To report without delay the journal editor or publisher if an author notices a major inaccuracy or erroneousness in his/her published work. He/she has to collaborate with the editor to withdraw or correct the paper.

Publishers

Publishers should:

Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract.
Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for reviewers).
Defend intellectual property and copyright.
Promote editorial independence.
Work with journal editors to:
- Regulate journal policies appropriately and aspire to meet those policies, particularly concerning: editorial independence; research ethics; authorship; clearness and honesty; peer review; appeals and complaints.
- Inform journal policies to authors, readers, reviewers.
- Evaluate journal policies periodically.
- Preserve the integrity of the academic record.
- Support the parties in charge of the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, assist in the resolution of these problems.
- Issue amendments, clarifications, and retractions.
- Publish content on a timely basis.