Revitalization Ideology and Pillars of Nationality in Citizens Dynamics Pre-Post Legislative and Executive Elections on 2024

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24114/jk.v22i1.64237

Keywords:

Conflict, Citizenship, Election, Pancasila, Revitalization, Konflik, Kewarganegaraan, Pemilu, Revitalisasi

Abstract

The Community members have become vulnerable to division, particularly due to the polarization of their election choices. Whether economic, social, or political, campaign promises fuel this polarization. Revitalized Pancasila and the pillars of nationality can to restore the dignity of the Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia and prevent its fragmentation. The dissemination of Pancasila ideological values and the pillars of nationality is an agenda that can provide an explicit understanding of the homogenization of national and state life ethics. This activity aims to assess the influence of the socialization of the Pancasila ideology and the values of the pillars of nationality on social dynamics after the 2024 election. The results indicate that while respondent recognizes these values as noble and should implement them, they solely base their implementation on religious mu’amalah. This means that if a member of society has low religious knowledge, the potential for violating the ethics and ideological values of Pancasila and its national pillars is also quite high. Therefore, to lessen the threat of post-election division, an understanding of national insight, which encompasses the values of the Pancasila as ideology and the pillars of nationality, must accompany an understanding of religion.

References

Adams, N. E. (2015). Bloom’s Taxonomy of Cognitive Learning Objectives. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 103(3), 152–153. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.010

Bachtiar, F. R. (2014). Pemilu Indonesia: Kiblat Negara Demokrasi dari Berbagai Representasi. Jurnal Politik Profetik, 2(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.24252/profetik.v2i1a3

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals (Handbook 1). Green: Longmans.

Boangmanalu, S., & Sembiring, A. B. (2022). Dinamika Kontemporer Kewarganegaraan Indonesia (Studi Etnisitas Dalam Pemilihan Bupati Pakpak Bharat). Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 19(2), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.24114/JK.V19I2.30402

Frank, R. W., & Coma, F. M. i. (2017). How Election Dynamics Shape Perceptions of Electoral Integrity. Electoral Studies, 48(8), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.05.007

Gathmann, C., & Garbers, J. (2023). Citizenship and Integration. Labour Economics, 82(6), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2023.102343

Harahap, S. (2018). Konflik Etnis dan Agama di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Sosiologi Agama (JISA), 1(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.30829/jisa.v1i2.5096

Hastangka, Armawi, A., & Kaelan. (2017). Empat Pilar MPR RI: Politik Bahasa dan Delegitimasi Makna Pancasilah (Suatu Telaah Filsafat Bahasa). Ilmiah CIVIS, 6(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.26877/civis.v6i2.1901

Indah, S. (2021). Dinamika Sosial dan Budaya Masyarakat Urban. Jurnal Kreatifitas Kebudayaan, 3(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/xbm3f

Irwan. (2020). Dinamika dan Perubahan Sosial pada Komunitas Lokal. Jakarta: Deepublish Berkerjasama dengan STKIP PGRI Sumbar.

Irwandi, & Chotim, E. R. (2017). Analisis Konflik antar Masyarakat, Pemerintah dan Swasta. JISPOL: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 7(2), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.15575/jp.v7i2.2414

Jamaludin, A. N. (2017). Sosiologi Perkotaan: Memahami Masyarakat Kota dan Problematikanya. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia Bandung.

Justan, R., Margiono, Aziz, A., & Sumiati. (2024). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). ULIL ALBAB : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 3(2), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.56799/jim.v3i2.2772

Juwita, J., Joefrian, M. S., Rusta, A., Irawati, I., & Fajri, M. (2023). Transparansi dan Integritas dalam Pemilihan Umum: Upaya Mencegah Kecurangan dan Manipulasi. Madani Jurnal Politik Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 15(03), 445–453. https://doi.org/10.52166/madani.v15i03.5795

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Kristiyanto, H., Arinanto, S., & Ghafur, H. S. (2023). Institutionalization and Party Resilience in Indonesian Electoral Democracy. Heliyon, 9(12), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22919

Lenaini, I. (2021). Teknik Pengambilan Sampel Purposive dan Snowball Sampling. HISTORIS: Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Sejarah, 6(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.31764/historis.v6i1.4075

Mudjiyanto, B., Launa, L., & Mansur, M. (2024). Pemilu Berintegritas dan Malpraktik Pemilu. Jurnal Communitarian, 5(2), 916–949. https://doi.org/10.56985/jc.v5i2.495

Nahuddin, Y. E., & Prastyo, A. (2020). Hubungan Agama dengan Pancasila dalam Perspektif Konstitusi. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 11(3), 282–290. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v11i3.4070

Pappas, E., Pierrakos, O., & Nagel, R. (2013). Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to Teach Sustainability in Multiple Contexts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48(6), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.039

Permadi, C., & Sukmara, A. (2014). Merasionalisasi Gagasan Kebangsaan Taufiq Kiemas. Jurnal Mahasiswa Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Brawijaya, 1(1), 1–18. Retrieved from http://jmipm.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/jmipm/article/view/5

Rahmawati, D., Riyanto, G., Mulyana, D., Viendyasari, M., & Anindhita, W. (2023). Architecture of Populism: Online Media and the Rise of Popular Common Politicians in Indonesian Political Landscape. The 5th International Conference on Vocational Education Applied Science and Technology 2022, 83(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022083044

Romdani, L. N., & Suryadi, K. (2021). Pilkada Dalam Pandemic: Bagaimana Warga Negara Memaknai Demokrasi Indonesia. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 18(2), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.24114/jk.v18i2.23416

Sagalane, A. B. (2015). Implementasi dan Implikasi Sosialisasi Empat Pilar Berbangsa dan Bernegara Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.31479/jphl.v9i1.27

Sapii, R. B. S., Susanto, A. H., & Aponno, A. D. (2022). Kekosongan Hukum Peraturan Penyelesaian Sengketa Proses Pemilu: Hambatan Pemilu Demokratis Dan Berintegritas Rezim Orde Baru. Japhtn-Han, 1(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.55292/japhtnhan.v1i1.3

Soekarnoputri, D. P. M. S. (2021). Kepemimpinan Presiden Megawati Pada Era Krisis Multidimensi, 2001-2004. Jurnal Pertahanan & Bela Negara, 11(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.33172/jpbh.v11i1.1211

Stone, H., Bleibaum, R. N., & Thomas, H. A. (2012). Descriptive Analysis. In H. Stone & J. L. Sidel (Eds.), Sensory Evaluation Practices (3rd ed., pp. 233–289). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-382086-0.00006-6

Subiyanto, A. E. (2020). Pemilihan Umum Serentak yang Berintegritas sebagai Pembaruan Demokrasi Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(2), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1726

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1978). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In M. J. Hatch & M. Schultz (Eds.), Organizational Identity: A Reader (Vol. 401, pp. 55–65). New York: Oxford University Press.

Welak, F. (2022). Populisme di Indoenesia: Ancaman Bagi Integritas Masyarakat dan Reaktualisasi Pancasila. Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan, 2(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.52738/pjk.v2i1.72

Yonas, A., Tawarik, O., Sapomo, & Hendri, P. (2024). Tata Kelola Demokrasi: Membangkitkan Semangat Pengawasan, Pengetahuan, Kesadaran, dan Partisipasi Politik Mahasiswa Melalui Program Sosialisasi. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 21(2), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.24114/jk.v21i2.61204

Published

01-04-2025

How to Cite

Abdillah, M. H., Fuady, N., & Makie, H. A. (2025). Revitalization Ideology and Pillars of Nationality in Citizens Dynamics Pre-Post Legislative and Executive Elections on 2024. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 22(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.24114/jk.v22i1.64237

Issue

Section

Articles