.png)
Learning buffer solution based on virtual lab in senior high school
Abstract
This study aims to determine whether there is a difference between the use of virtual lab and real lab media in guided inquiry learning on learning outcomes in the buffer solution material. Both learning media are taught using the same learning model, namely the guided inquiry learning model. The samples in this study were class XI MIPA 3 as the experimental I which was taught with the guided inquiry learning model using virtual lab media and class XI MIPA 6 as the experimental II which was taught by guided inquiry learning model using real lab. The instrument used in this research was a test of learning outcomes chemistry of the buffer solution material. The data analysis technique for hypothesis testing was the two-party t-test statistic. The results of data processing showed that the experimental I had a pretest mean of 26.04 and a mean of posttest 79.53, while the experimental II had a mean pretest of 47.95 and a mean of posttest of 72.84. Hypothesis testing was carried out using two-party t test from the learning outcomes data and it was obtained tcount = 2.201 while ttable = 1.988 for α = 0.05 so that tcount> ttable. So Ha accept, that is, there are differences in student learning outcomes taught by guided inquiry models using virtual lab and real lab media. Meanwhile, the increase in student learning outcomes in guided inquiry classes using virtual labs was 72%, and those using real labs were 52%.
Keywords: Virtual lab, Real lab, Guided inquiry, Buffer solutionsFull Text:
PDFReferences
Altun, E., Demirdağ, B., Feyzioğlu, B., Ateş, A., & Çobanoğlu, I. (2009). Developing an interactive virtual chemistry laboratory enriched with constructivist learning activities for secondary schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1895–1898. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.333
Kristanto, Y. E., & Susilo, H. (2016). Pengaruh model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajar IPA siswa kelas VII SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran (JPP), 22(2), 197-208.
Asnaini, A. (2017). Pengembangan LKPD berbasis pendekatan scientific untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar dan aktivitas peserta didik pada materi larutan penyangga. Lantanida Journal, 4(1), 60. DOI: 10.22373/lj.v4i1.1868
Assriyanto, K. E., Sukardjo, J. S., & Saputro, S. (2014). Pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis masalah melalui metode eksperimen dan inkuiri terbimbing ditinjau dari kreativitas siswa pada materi larutan penyangga di SMA N 2 Sukoharjo tahun ajaran 2013/2014. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia (JPK), 3(3), 89-97.
Barke, H.-D., & Wirbs, H. (2002). Structural units and chemical formulae. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract, 3(2), 185–200. DOI: 10.1039/b2rp90015g
Bilgin, I. (2009). The effects of guided inquiry instruction incorporating a cooperative learning approach on University students achievement of acid and bases concepts and attitude toward guided inquiry instruction. Scientific Research and Essays, 4(10), 1038-1046.
Ekasari, R. R., Gunawan, & Sahidu, H. (2016). Pengaruh model pembelajaran langsung berbantuan media laboratorium terhadap kreatifitas fisika siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 2(3), 106–110. DOI: 10.29303/jpft.v2i3.296
Harefa, N., Sinaga, M., & Silaban, S. (2020). Students perception and interest on chemistry: Learning evaluation integrated quizziz media. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 12(3), 143–150. DOI: 10.24114/jpkim.v12i3.21163
Hermansyah, H., Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., & Adawiyah, R. (2019). Guided inquiry model with virtual labs to improve students’ understanding on heat concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1153, 012116. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1153/1/012116
Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75–83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x
Moore, E. B., Herzog, T. A., & Perkins, K. K. (2013). Interactive simulations as implicit support for guided-inquiry. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract, 14(3), 257–268. DOI: 10.1039/c3rp20157k
Nuangchalerm, P. (2014). Inquiry-based learning in China: Lesson learned for school science practices. Asian Social Science, 10(13). DOI: 10.5539/ass.v10n13p64
Nworgu, L. N., & Otum, V. V. (2013). Effect of guided inquiry with analogy instructional strategy on students acquisition of science process skills. Journal Education and Practice, 4(27), 35-40.
Pambudi, T., Mulyani, S., & Saputro, A. N. C. (2015). pengaruh pembelajaran kimia dengan model pembelajaran learning cycle 5E menggunakan laboratorium real dan virtual ditinjau dari sikap ilmiah terhadap prestasi belajar siswa pada materi pokok hidrolisis garam kelas XI MIPA SMA Negeri 3 Surakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 5(1), 78-87.
Panggabean, F. T. M., Silaban, S., & Simorangkir, M. (2019). Implementation of virtual lab media using problem based learning models to increase students learning achievement based STIFI and learning style test. Proceedings AISTSSE, DOI: 10.4108/eai.18-10-2018.2287391
Silaban, S. (2021). Pengembangan program pengajaran. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Silitonga, P. M. (2011). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan. Medan: FMIPA Unimed.
Subhan. S., Salempa, P., & Danial, M. (2018). Pengaruh media animasi dalam model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis dan aktivitas belajar peserta didik pada materi kesetimbangan kimia. Chemistry Education Review (CER), (1), 125. DOI: 10.26858/cer.v0i1.5616
Sudjana. 2005. Metoda statistika. Bandung: Tarsito.
Sugiharti, G, & Hasibuan, S. K. (2017). The effect of inquiry learning method by using laboratory and logical thinking on learning outcome in chemical reaction rate. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 9(1), 229-235. DOI: 10.24114/jpkim.v9i1.6184
Sugiharti, G, & Limbong, E. R. (2018). Application of learning model with virtual lab and motivation in learning chemistry. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 10(1), 362–365. DOI: 10.24114/jpkim.v10i1.9676
Tuysuz, C. (2010). The effect of virtual laboratory on students’ achievement and attitude in chemistry. International Online Journal of Educational Science, 2(1), 37-53.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v13i1.24144
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 390 timesPDF - 334 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Gulmah Sugiharti, Aldhi Kurnia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia
Contact: +62 853-1769-2813
Email: jpkim.pps@unimed.ac.id
Jl. Willem Iskandar, Pasar V, Medan Estate, Medan City, North Sumatra Province, Postal Code 20221. Phone/fax: (061) 661 3365 / +62 852-7802-1981.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.