The effectiveness of the four-step jigsaw and jigsaw learning model in improving students' argumentation skills about salt hydrolysis concept

Authors

  • Windy Kartika Postgraduate, Jambi University, Jambi 36361, Indonesia
  • Asrial Asrial Jambi University, Jambi 36361, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Haris Effendi-Hasibuan Jambi University, Jambi 36361, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v13i3.29929

Abstract

One of the learning models that can train students in developing argumentation skills is the jigsaw learning and its modified forms. This study aimed to see the effectiveness of the four-step jigsaw learning and the Jigsaw learning in improving students' argumentation skills about the concept of salt hydrolysis. This study was conducted with 2 classes of 11 grade students of SMAN 7 Kerinci Jambi. Some 53 students in total were purposively recruited and participated in this experiment. Concurrent embedded mixed method with two-group pretest-posttest control group design was used in this study. The results of independent t-test showed that 4SJ was more effective than the Jigsaw class (t= 2.668; p-value = 0.01 < 0.05). It was supported by the n-Gain of 4SJ which was 0.71 and the n-Gain of jigsaw was 0.67. Two factors that influenced the differences in students' argumentation skills were observed; these included the difference in learning duration and the intensiveness in conducting the argumentation debate. Keywords: argumentation ability, four-step jigsaw, jigsaw, salt hydrolysis

Author Biographies

Windy Kartika, Postgraduate, Jambi University, Jambi 36361, Indonesia

Chemistry Education Study Program

Asrial Asrial, Jambi University, Jambi 36361, Indonesia

Department of Chemistry Education

Muhammad Haris Effendi-Hasibuan, Jambi University, Jambi 36361, Indonesia

Department of Chemistry Education

References

Dalimunthe, M. (2017). The differences in student learning outcomes by using the jigsaw type cooperative method and the recitation method on hydrocarbon material. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 9(3), 336-340. DOI:10.24114/jpkim.v9i3.8383

Effendi-Hasibuan, M.H., Harizon, H., Ngatijo, N., Fuldiaratman, F., & Sulistyo, U. (2019). Promoting indonesian secondary school students' argumentation skills in the concept of chemistry reaction-rate: A comparative effect of three cooperative learning strategies. Journal of Physic: Conference Series, 1317, 012143.DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012143.

Harahap, N.M., Hutabarat, W., & Silaban, S. (2018). The effect of model problem based learning (PBL) assistance of prezi media on student learning outcomes in colloid materials. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 200, 456-458

Hasibuan, M. H. E., Fuldiaratman, F., Dewi, F., Sulistiyo, U., & Hindarti, S. (2020). Jigsaw learning strategy in a diverse science-classroom setting: Feasibility, challenges, and adjustment. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(3), 733-745. DOI:10.21831/cp.v39i3.30634

Junaini, J., Rusdi, M. R. M., & Muslim, M. (2020). Penerapan model problem based learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi matematika peserta didik kelas X SMAN 2 kota Jambi. PHI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 21-31. DOI:10.33087/phi.v4i1.82

Kurniasari, I. S., & Setyarsih, W. (2017). Penerapan model pembelajaran argument driven inquiry (ADI) untuk melatihkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa pada materi usaha dan energi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 06(03), 171“174.

Lestari, Y., & Mujib, M. (2018). Kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis melalui model education coins of mathematics competition (E-COC). Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 1(3), 265-274.

Lingga, P. (2015). Upaya meningkatkan kreativitas siswa dalam pembelajaran biologi melalui penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif type Jigsaw di SMA Negeri 2 Balige. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 7(2), 31-39.

Matuk, C. (2016). The learning affordances of augmented reality for museum exhibits on human health. Museums & Social Issues, 11(1), 73-87. DOI:10.1080/15596893.2016.1142815

Pakpahan, D. N., Situmorang, M., Sitorus, M., & Silaban, S. (2021). The Development of Project-Based Innovative Learning Resources for Teaching Organic Analytical Chemistry. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 59, 782-788.

Purba, D. N., Damanik, M., Silaban, S., & Simatupang, L. (2018). The difference of student ™s activities and learning outcome with problem based learning using macromedia flash and handout. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 10(3), 403“408. DOI:10.24114/jpkim.v10i3.12704

Pritasari, A. C., Sri, D., & Riezky, M. P. (2016). Peningkatan kemampuan argumentasi melalui penerapan model problem based learning pada siswa kelas X MIA 1 SMA Batik 2 Surakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2014/2015. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 8(1), 1-7.

Rahayu, M., Kurniati, T., & Yusup, I. R. (2018). Keterampilan argumentasi pada pembelajaran materi sistem respirasi manusia melalui penerapan model pembelajaran think talk write. Jurnal Bio Educatio, 3(2), 50-58.

Ross, A., & Willson, V. L. (2018). Basic and advanced statistical tests: Writing results sections and creating tables and figures. Springer.

Rusman. (2011). Model-model pembelajaran: Mengembangkan profesionalisme guru. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Sarira, P. M., Priyayi, D. F., & Astuti, S. P. (2019). Hubungan Argumentasi ilmiah dan hasil belajar kognitif pada penerapan model problem based learning (PBL). Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematika, 7(2), 1-10. DOI:10.23971/eds.v7i2.1258

Slavin, R. E. (2010). Cooperative learning teori, riset dan praktik. Bandung: Nusa Media.

Witri, E., Ngatijo, N., & Effendi-Hasibuan, M. H. (2020). Development of electronic student worksheets based on toulmin argumentation patterns to improve argumentation skills in basic acid materials. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 12(3), 116-123. DOI:10.24114/jpkim.v12i3.21160

Downloads

Published

2021-12-03

How to Cite

Kartika, W., Asrial, A., & Effendi-Hasibuan, M. H. (2021). The effectiveness of the four-step jigsaw and jigsaw learning model in improving students’ argumentation skills about salt hydrolysis concept. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 13(3), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v13i3.29929

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 3 (2021): December

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Windy Kartika, Asrial Asrial, Muhammad Haris Effendi-Hasibuan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors published in this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The copyright of each article is retained by the author (s).
  2. The author grants the journal the first publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, allowing others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of published journal versions of the work (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), with acknowledgment of their initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (For example in the Institutional Repository or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and larger citations of published work.

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License