PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN EVALUASI BERBASIS GAMBAR SEBAGAI ALAT ASESMEN ALTERNATIF PADA PEMBELAJARAN IPAS SISWA KELAS III

Authors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24114/kgkry681
Keywords:
Image-Based Evaluation Instrument, Alternative Assessment, IPAS Learning, ADDIE Model
Abstract

This study develops image-based evaluation instruments as alternative assessments for Grade III IPAS learning on changes in the state of matter, using the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). The study was conducted at SDN 101280 Gunungtua Tonga with 20 Grade III students as subjects and three expert validators. Data were collected through expert validation sheets (Aiken V formula), teacher and student response questionnaires, and empirical item analysis. Results show: (1) the instrument is valid, with Aiken V scores of 0.850 (content), 0.875 (design), and 0.900 (evaluation) — all exceeding the minimum threshold of 0.600; 25 of 40 initial items (62.5%) passed selection; all 25 items were empirically valid (r > 0.444); (2) the instrument is very practical with a combined score of 87.32% from teacher (88.33%) and student (86.3%) responses; (3) the instrument is effective, with 100% of multiple-choice distractors functioning, proportional difficulty distribution, and a class average score of 61.1% (Effective category). The instrument is recommended as an alternative IPAS assessment tool in elementary schools.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biographies
  1. Sri Wenni, State University of Medan

    Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Medan

  2. Eva Betty Simanjuntak, State University of Medan

    Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Medan

  3. Nurmayani, State University of Medan

    Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Medan

  4. Suyit Ratno, State University of Medan

    Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Medan

References

Afriani, L., Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long, S., & Tinggi Agama Islam Al-Muntahy, S. (2025). Understanding the Design of Research and Development Methods in the Field of Education.

Alam, S., Japar, M., Nur, M., & Asnur, A. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Berbasis Gambar Siswa Tingkat Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan, 8(1).

Aldoobie, N. (2015). ADDIE Model: Analysis Phase in the Development of Learning Materials. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(6).

Almelhi, A. M. (2021). Effectiveness of the ADDIE Model within an E-Learning Environment in Developing Creative Writing in EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 14(2), 20. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n2p2

Arikunto, S. (2020). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: Rineka Cipta

Asma, H., & Dallel, S. (2020). Cognitive Load Theory and its Relation to Instructional Design. Arab World English Journal, 11(4), 110-127. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.8

Branch, R. M., & Kopcha, T. J. (2021). Instructional Design Models and Theories: The ADDIE Model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 1459-1473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09944-7

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2020). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.).

Evagorou, M., Erduran, S., & Mantyla, T. (2015). The role of visual representations in scientific practices. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0024-x

Farrar, J., Arizpe, E., & Lees, R. (2024). Thinking and learning through images: a review of research related to visual literacy, children's reading and children's literature. Education 3-13, 52(7), 993-1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2024.2357892

Geschwind, G., Vignal, M., Caballero, M. D., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2024). Evidence for validity and reliability of a research-based assessment instrument on measurement uncertainty. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.020125

Hamed Taherdoost, A., & Lumpur, K. (2016). Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 5(3).

Levratto, V., Gomez Gomez, H., & Rame Lopez, J. (2024). Implementing visual literacy techniques among future educators in pre-school and primary school settings. Journal of Visual Literacy, 43(4), 326-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2024.2432802

Magdalena, I., Hifziyah, M., Aeni, V. N., & Rahayu, R. P. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Siswa Tingkat Sekolah Dasar Kabupaten Tangerang. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial, 2(2).

Moses Adeleke Adeoye, Wirawan, K. A. S. I., Pradnyani, M. S. S., & Septiarini, N. I. (2024). Revolutionizing Education: Unleashing the Power of the ADDIE Model. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 13(1), 202-209. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v13i1.68624

Muniroh, & Hidayatulloh, M. K. Y. (2024). Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Pilihan Ganda Berbasis HOTS pada Mata Pelajaran PAIBP. 1(3), 676-687. https://doi.org/10.61722/jrme.v1i3.2235

Nikleva, D. G., & Rodriguez-Munoz, F. J. (2022). Effects of a Visual Literacy Programme for the Improvement of Reading Comprehension in Primary and Secondary School Students. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 22, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.21248/L1ESLL.2022.22.1.394

Peter, S., Karst, K., & Bonefeld, M. (2024). Objective assessment criteria reduce the influence of judgmental bias on grading. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1386016

Satria, M. R. (2024). Research on the Development of Assessment Instruments in Indonesia (pp. 73-81). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-245-3_9

Shakeel, S. I., Al Mamun, M. A., & Haolader, M. F. A. (2023). Instructional design with ADDIE and rapid prototyping for blended learning. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 7601-7630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11471-0

Spatioti, A. G., Kazanidis, I., & Pange, J. (2022). A Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education. Information, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/info13090402

Sugiomo. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (Edisi Kedua). Bandung: Bineka Cipta.

Szabo, D. A. (2022). Adapting the Addie Instructional Design Model in Online Education. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Psychologia-Paedagogia, 67(1), 126-140. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbpsyped.2022.1.08

Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach's Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Wallden, R. (2024). Visual resources in science education: Affordances for promoting fourth-grade students' disciplinary learning. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2298976

Wibowo, F. S., Patonah, S., & Sukamto, S. (2023). Pengembangan Instrumen Soal IPA Berbasis STEM untuk Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 7(3), 1609-1619. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v7i3.4975

Cover Image
Downloads
Published
2026-06-16
Issue
Vol. 16 No. 2 (2026): SCHOOL EDUCATION JOURNAL PGSD FIP UNIMED
Section
Articles
License

Copyright (c) 2026 SCHOOL EDUCATION JOURNAL PGSD FIP UNIMED

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors whose manuscripts are approved are approved as follows:

  1. The publication rights for all journal manuscript materials published/published on the SEJ (School Education Journal) E-Journal site are held by the editorial board with the author's knowledge (moral rights remain with the manuscript authors).
  2. The formal legal requirements for accessing this electronic digital journal article are subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA 4.0) license, which means that E-Journal SEJ (School Education Journal) has the right to store, transfer media/format, manage in the form of a database, maintain, and publish articles without asking permission from the author as long as the author's name remains as the copyright owner.
  3. Manuscripts published/published electronically are open access for educational, research, and library purposes.