Cultural Geography Perspectives on the Dayak Hampang Uplands-Meratus Mountains, Indonesia

Authors

  • Nasruddin Nasruddin Department of Geography, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
  • Mohd Hairy Ibrahim Department of Geography and Environment, Faculty of Human Sciences, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia
  • Muhamad Rusmin Nuryadin Department of Economics and Development Studies, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
  • Selamat Riadi Department of Geography, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24114/jg.v18i1.71837

Keywords:

Cultural Geography, Dayak Hampang Uplands, Meratus Mountains

Abstract

This study examines the cultural geography of the Dayak Hampang community in the Meratus Mountains by integrating spatial, environmental, and political-economic perspectives. It employs a quasi-qualitative approach supported by survey methods and descriptive analysis to operationalize a cultural geography framework. Qualitative data on cultural values, indigenous knowledge, and settlement toponymy were collected through in-depth interviews. Settlement patterns were analyzed using Nearest Neighbour Analysis, GIS, field surveys, and documentation. The findings reveal that clustered toponymy and settlement patterns reflect a strong socio-spatial attachment to rivers, forests, and cultivated land, forming an integrated cultural landscape rooted in customary institutions. Shifting cultivation and ritual practices function as adaptive socio-ecological strategies that sustain livelihoods and conserve the mountainous environment despite pressures associated with protected forest designation. The study demonstrates that socio-ecological resilience increases when customary governance is formally recognized by reclassifying protected forests as customary forests (hutan adat). Conversely, restrictive state forest regimes that limit community Access, Assets, and Activities (3A) weaken adaptive capacity and heighten ecological vulnerability. Accordingly, the Sustainable Cultural Geography (SCG) model is expressed as: SCG = f (Ecological Resilience, Customary Forest Tenure, 3A Capacity), positioning cultural landscape sustainability as a function of these interrelated components.

References

Aian G. Villanueva, P., & P Ruanto, A. (2016). Mobilizing Resources but Still Mining for Opportunities?: Indigenous Peoples, their Land and the Philippine State. Journal of Government and Politics, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2016.0031

Aitken, S., & Valentine, & G. (2012). Approaches to Human Geography. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://https:/doi.org/10.4135/9781446215432

Akhmad Nulhaqim, S., Mulyana, N., & Suharto, E. (2021). Monitoring and Evaluation Based on The Right of Selfditermination: Evidence from Indigenous Peoples Empowerment in Jambi, Indonesia. Rigeo, 11(10). https://rigeo.org/menu-script/index.php/rigeo/article/view/1418

Arjjumend, H., & Beaulieu-Boon, H. (2018). Customary Institutions and Rules underlying Conservation Functions of Sacred Sites or Indigenous and Community Conserved Areas. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 1(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.01021

Atkinson, D., Jackson, P., Sibley, D., & Washbourne, N. (2005). Cultural Geography. I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd.

Baiduri, R., Wuriyani, E. P., & Harahap, M. (2025). Batak Toba Women’s Struggle to Protect Traditional Frankincense Forests in a Geographical Perspective. Jurnal Geografi, 17(1), 141–151. https://https://doi.org/10.24114/jg.v17i1.64557

Balai Besar Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sumberdaya Lahan Pertanian. (2011). Peta Sumberdaya Tanah Tingkat Tinjau Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan Skala 1:250.000.

Bari, A. B. M. M., Intesar, A., Mamun, A. Al, Debnath, B., Islam, A. R. M. T., Alam, G. M. M., & Parvez, M. S. (2024). Gender-based vulnerability and adaptive capacity in the disaster-prone coastal areas from an intersectionality perspective. Climate Risk Management, 43, 100581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2023.100581

Boas, F. (1887). The Study of Geography. Science, 9(210), 137–141. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1762738

Brandt, J. (1999). Geography as “landscape ecology.” Danish Journal of Geography, 1, 21–33.

Bungin, B. (2022). Social Research Methods (2nd ed.). Kencana.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design Qualitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publication.

Daito, A. (2023). Ethnography Research: Dayak Kaharingan Ethics Kalimantan. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 3(4), 368–376. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v3i4.238

Darmadi, H. (2017). Dayak and Their Daily Life. JETL (Journal Of Education, Teaching and Learning), 2(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v2i1.145

Darme, M., & Kurniawati. (2024). Implementation of Human Rights as a Prevention of Discrimination Against Aborigines by European Nations (1967-2022). Criksetra: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, 13(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.36706/jc.v13i1.6

Davies, W., & Gilmartin, M. (2002). Geography as a Cultural Field. In R. Gerber & M. Williams (Eds.), Geography, Culture and Education (pp. 13–30). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1679-6_2

de Freitas Sampaio, J. (2025). Gendered vulnerabilities and sexual violence: Intersecting inequalities during the 2024 floods in Porto Alegre, Brazil. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 128, 105728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105728

Erikha, F. (2021). Application of the Concept of Critical Toponymies To Street Name Changes in Bandung, Yogyakarta, and Surabaya. Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya, 11(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.17510/paradigma.v11i1.373

Farina, T., Nugraha, S., Mulyawan, A., & Wijaya, A. (2024). Pengakuan dan perlindungan hutan adat dalam mewujudkan hak masyarakat hukum adat di Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah. Unes Law Review, 6(3), 9377–9389. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3

Gashure, S., & Wana, D. (2023). Sustainability of the long-term indigenous soil and water conservation practices in the UNESCO designated cultural landscapes of Konso, Ethiopia. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 100221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2023.100221

Gumelar, F. (2024). Etika Lingkungan dalam Tradisi Berladang Suku Dayak Meratus. Jurnal Ekologi, Masyarakat Dan Sains, 5(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.55448/nqap2r14

Hanafi, F., & Priakusuma, D. (2023). Pengaruh Budaya Dan Komplek Regional Dalam Etimologi Toponimi Di Wilayah Sekitar Unnes. Geosfera: Jurnal Penelitian Geografi, 2(2), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.37905/geojpg.v2i2.23055

Harada, K., Habib, M., Sakata, Y., & Maryudi, A. (2022). The role of NGOs in recognition and sustainable maintenance of customary forests within indigenous communities: The case of Kerinci, Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 113, 105865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105865

Hartatik. (2017). Barito River on Dayak Dispersal in the Southeastern Part of Kalimantan. Naditira Widya, 11(2), 149–164. https://ejournal.brin.go.id/nw/issue/view/554

Hartatik. (2020). The Kaharingan Religion as Trace of Austronesian of Dayak’s People. In Rusyanti, W. Retnanintyas, & I. Setiawidjaya (Eds.), Seminar Nasional Arkeologi 2019 “Indonesia Rumah Besar Austronesia” (pp. 91–99). Balai Arkeologi Jawa Barat. https://doi.org/10.24164/prosiding.v3i1.10

Hartshorne, R. (1960). Political geography in the modern world. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 4(1), 52–66. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i208924

Haryani, T. (2022). Penanaman Nilai-Nilai Kearifan Lokal Dayak Ma’anyan dalam Pembentukan Karakter Anak Usia Dini di Kabupaten Barito Timur. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang, 13(1), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.37304/jikt.v13i1.151

Herlina Lupi Listyaning Putri, & Nasruddin. (2025). Analysis of the Spatial Pattern of Oil Palm Trees in Blocks N39 and P39 in PT. Nusantara Sawit Persada. JURNAL GEOGRAFI: Geografi Dan Pengajarannya, 23(2), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.26740/jggp.v23n2.p339-352

Huang, N., & Ge, L. (2024). Mining and indigenous communities in Southeast Asia: Examining the social impact of mineral development. The Extractive Industries and Society, 17, 101363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101363

Humaedi, M. A., Nadzir, I., Himmi, S. K., Astutik, S., Tessa, A., & Andari, R. N. (2024). Changing Livelihoods, Development, and Cultural Practices: Reshaping Forests Among the Tau Taa Vana People. Forest and Society, 8(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v8i1.26593

Inman, D. (2016). From the Global to the Local: The Development of Indigenous Peoples’ Land Rights Internationally and in Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of International Law, 6(1), 46–88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251314000356

J. Bonnemaison, C. Blanc-Pamard, M. Lasseur, C. Thibault, Josée Pénot-Demetry, & J. Agnew. (2006). Culture and space: conceiving a new cultural geography. Choice Reviews Online, 44(01), 44-0463-44–0463. https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.44-0463

Johansen, K. B. H., & Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T. (2024). ‘It’s like you’re almost being exposed to a flasher’ – Young people’s experiences with gendered vulnerability and digital sexual harassment in Denmark. Women’s Studies International Forum, 105, 102954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2024.102954

Kairuz, C. A., Casanelia, L. M., Bennett-Brook, K., Coombes, J., & Yadav, U. N. (2021). Impact of racism and discrimination on physical and mental health among Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander peoples living in Australia: a systematic scoping review. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1302. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11363-x

Kwirinus, D., & Saeng, V. (2023). Ancestral Beliefs, Religious Systems and Views of Life Traditional Dayak Community. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 4(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.23917/sosial.v4i1.1628

L Ginoga, K., Lugina, M., & Djaenudin, D. (2005). Kajian Kebijakan Pengelolaan Hutan Lindung. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 2(2), 169–194. https://doi.org/10.20886/jpsek.2005.2.2.169-194

Leo, S., Supriatna, J., Mizuno, K., & Margules, C. (2022). Indigenous Dayak Iban customary perspective on sustainable forest management, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d230144

Lindblad, J. T., & Verhagen, P. E. . (2012). Antara Dayak dan Belanda Sejarah Ekonomi Kalimantan Timur dan Kalimantan Selatan 1880-1942 (1st ed.). Lilin Persada Press.

Luardini, M. A., Sutama, P., & Asi, N. (2016). The River Civilization of the Balinese and Dayakese Legends: A Comparative Study on Anthropological Linguistics. Jurnal Kajian Bali (Journal of Bali Studies), 6(1). https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kajianbali/article/view/19893

Manatsa, D., Bowora, J., Mukwenyi, P., Pedzisai, E., & Gomo, M. (2025). Intersectional vulnerabilities in disaster resilience: Gender, geography, and poverty in Zimbabwe’s agrarian communities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 129, 105771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105771

Mangkunegara, R. A., Alfirdaus, L. K., & Fitriah, F. (2025). A Human Rights Approach to Examine Indonesia’s Social Forestry Policies. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights, 8(2), 347. https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v8i2.52858

Manner, H. I. (1969). Effect of Shifting Cultivation on Some Soil Properties of the Bismarck Mountains, Territory of Papua and New Guenea (Issue August) [Master of Arts in Geography-University of Hawaii at Manoa]. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/36018

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd ed.). SAGE Publication Ltd. https://vivauniversity.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/milesandhuberman1994.pdf

Mitchell, D. (2002). Cultural landscapes: The dialectical landscape - Recent landscape research in human geography. Progress in Human Geography, 26(3), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132502ph376pr

Moïse, R. (2011). If Pygmies could talk. Before Farming, 2011(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3828/bfarm.2011.4.1

Moore, T. (2014). Aboriginal Agency and Marginalisation in Australian Society. Social Inclusion, 2(3), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v2i3.38

Mubarak, H. (2021). Analisis Morfologi Bahasa Dayak Samihim di Desa Mangka Kecamatan Pamukan Barat Kabupaten Kotabaru. Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 9(1), 86–96. https://ejurnal.stkip-pb.ac.id/index.php/jurnal/article/view/191/147

Nareswari, N. (2008). Eksistensi Kaharingan di Dalam Masyarakat Dayak (Studi Kasus di Kelurahan Kereng Bangkirai Kecamatan Sabangau Kota Palangkaraya Kalimantan Tengah) [Universitas Sriwijaya]. In Skripsi Jurusan Sosiologi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Sriwijaya. https://h7.cl/1go2C

Nasruddin. (2017). Spatial Characteristic of Coal Mining in Kutai Kartanegara Regency, East Kalimantan Province. Sumatra Journal of Disaster, Geography and Geography Education, 1(2), 152. https://doi.org/10.24036/sjdgge.v1i2.101

Nopembereni, E. D., Sugiyanto, S., Sukesi, K., & Yuliati, Y. (2019). Local Wisdom in Shifting Cultivation Management of Dayak Ngaju Community, Central Kalimantan. Journal of Socioeconomics and Development, 2(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.31328/jsed.v2i1.939

Nurliatin, R., Fahmi, S., & Ardiansah. (2024). Implementasi Pemberdayaan Komunitas Adat Terpencil. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 7(2), 648–666. https://doi.org/10.56301/CSJ.V7I2.1443

Oakes, T. S., & Price, P. L. (2008). The Cultural Geography Reader. Routledge.

Peluso, N. L. (1992). The Political Ecology of Extraction and Extractive Reserves in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Development and Change, 23(4), 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1992.tb00469.x

Prabowo BN, A. (2023). Isue Strategis Kawasan Hutan pada Penyusunan Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah. Jurnal Hutan Tropis, 11(4), 505. https://doi.org/10.20527/jht.v11i4.18200

R Bintarto, & Hadisumarmo, S. (1982). Metode Analisa Geografi (2nd ed.). LP3ES.

Rif’an, M. (2020). Dilema Kebijakan Pengelolaan Hutan di Indonesia. Rewang Rencang: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 1(8), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v1i8.216

Riwut, T. (2003). Maneser Panatau Tatu Hiang; Menyelami Kekayaan Leluhur (1st ed.). Pusakalima-Balai Pelestarian Kebudayaan Wilayah XII, Kementerian Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

Setiawan, T. A. B. N., Kusuma, & Damai, H. (2019). Perkembangan Kebudayaan Austronesia di Kawasan Asia Tenggara dan Sekitarnya. Naditira Widya, 13(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.24832/nw.v13i2.320

Shahzad, M. A., Zhao, X., Zhang, J., Rasheed, M., & Qin, S. (2025). Livelihood resilience and digitalization: Food security strategies for marginalized rural communities affected by floods in Pakistan. Climate Services, 40, 100612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2025.100612

Shoorcheh, M. (2018). Geography as a Science of Spatialities. Lambert Academic Publishing.

Sihombing, R. S. M., Widen, K., & Sangalang, O. (2018). Model community participation Dayak in river area in management and utilization of Kahayan river. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 7(10), 2541–2550. www.isdsnet.com/ijds

Sillander, K. (2004). Acting Authoritatively: How Authority is Expressed through Social Action among the Bentian of Indonesian Borneo. Research Institute, Swedish School of Social Science, Helsinki University Press.

Sujarwani, R., Dewi Wulandari, F., Husni, A., Rianto, F., & . S. (2018). Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Komunitas Adat Terpencil (Kat) Oleh Pemerintah Kabupaten Lingga. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya, 20(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v20.n1.p17-31.2018

Syam’ani, M., A. Rahman, A., Kusmartono, V. P. R., Hadijah, S., Kawi, D., Anis, M. Z. A., Subiyakto, B., Usman, H. A. C., Yahya, Z., Ideham, S., Yusran, M., Sanderta, B., Wajidi, Artha, A., Syafrullah, M., Noor, Y., Budhigawis, A. H., Triatno, A., Nasai, M., … Muhith, A. (2003). Sejarah Banjar (M. S. Ideham, Sjarifuddin, G. Usman, M. Z. A. Anis, & Wajidi (eds.); 1st ed.). Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Daerah Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan. https://www.eduhistory.id/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/16.-SEJARAH-BANJAR.pdf

Tangney, R., Paroissien, R., Le Breton, T. D., Thomsen, A., Doyle, C. A. T., Ondik, M., Miller, R. G., Miller, B. P., & Ooi, M. K. J. (2022). Success of post-fire plant recovery strategies varies with shifting fire seasonality. Communications Earth and Environment, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00453-2

Thrupp, L. A., Hecht, S. B., Browder, J. O., Lynch, O. J., Megateli, N., & O’Brien, W. (1997). The Diversity and Dynamics of Shifting Cultivation: Myths, Realities, and Policy Implications. World Resources Institut. http://pdf.wri.org/diversitydynamicscultivation_bw.pdf

Tichelaar, T. (2022). Toponymy and Language. DGSD-UNGEGN Toponymy Course Enschede/Frankfurt, 47–57. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/geoinfo/ungegn/docs/_data_icacourses/_HtmlModules/_Documents/D09/documents/D09-01_Tichelaar.pdf

Tobroni, F. (2016). Menguatkan Hak Masyarakat Adat Atas Hutan Adat (Studi Putusan MK Nomor 35/ PUU-X/2012). Jurnal Konstitusi, 10(3), 461. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1035

Troll, C. (1971). Landscape ecology (geoecology) and biogeocenology — A terminological study. Geoforum, 2(4), 43–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(71)90029-7

Umberan, M., Nurcahyani, L., Purba, J., & Hendraswati. (1994). Sejarah Kebudayaan Kalimantan (1st ed.). CV. Dwi Jaya Karya Jakarta-Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. https://url-shortener.me/5MLL

Ungar, P. (2021). Assembling an Ecosystem. Conservation and Society, 19(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_19_103

Utami, W., & Nazir Salim, M. (2021). Local wisdom as a peatland management strategy of land fire mitigation in meranti regency, indonesia. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 27(March), S127–S137.

Verdu, P., & Destro-Bisol, G. (2012). African Pygmies, What’s Behind a Name? Human Biology, 84(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3378/027.084.0105

Widen, K. (2023). Orang Dayak dan Kebudayaannya. Journal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Pemerintahan, 12(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.37304/jispar.v12i2.9834

Wijayanti, P., Noviani, R., Widiyanti, B. L., Nursaly, B. R., & Muzaqi, F. (2025). Toponimi Lanskap Karst Berdasarkan Hidromorfologi Karst Gunungsewu, di Kecamatan Giritontro, Jawa Tengah. Majalah Geografi Indonesia, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.22146/MGI.100438

Wilson, W. (2025). Philosophy of Human Life of the Dayak De’sa Tribe Digital Era. In Natalia (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Christian and Inter-Religious Studies (ICC-IRS 2024) (pp. 494–503). Anvances in Soscial Science, Education and Humaties Research 932. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-424-2_55

Yayuk, R. (2019). The Austronesian Trace on the Dayak Meratus People in Kotabaru, Hampang District. Jurnal Penelitian Sejarah Dan Budaya, 5(2), 150–171. https://doi.org/10.36424/JPSB.V5I2.34

Yondri, L. (2019). Research on Human and Austronesian Culture in Subangalarang Sites, Subang, North Coast of West Java. In Rusyanti;, W. Retnaningtyas, & I. Setiawidjaya (Eds.), Seminar Nasional Arkeologi 2019 “Indonesia Rumah Besar Austronesia” (pp. 141–152). Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan-Balai Arkeologi Jawa Barat. https://doi.org/10.24164/prosiding.v3i1.6

Yuliani, H. (2019). Karakteristik Kehidupan Suku Banjar Bantaran Sungai di Kota Banjarmasin. Jurnal Sosial Pariwisata, 1(2), 48–52. https://akparnas.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/jsp/article/view/13/8

Downloads

Published

2026-04-08

How to Cite

Cultural Geography Perspectives on the Dayak Hampang Uplands-Meratus Mountains, Indonesia. (2026). JURNAL GEOGRAFI, 18(1), 154-176. https://doi.org/10.24114/jg.v18i1.71837