Transforming Prospective Elementary Teachers' Social Studies Learning through Generative AI in the Digital Era

Authors

  • Ruslaini Ruslaini Department of Primary School Teacher Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Iskandar Muda, Indonesia
  • Amir Mukhlis Department of Primary School Teacher Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Iskandar Muda, Indonesia
  • Juwita Tindaon Department of Primary School Teacher Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Quality University Berastagi, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Isa Postgraduate Programs Doctor of Philosophy of Syariah and Judiciary, Faculty of Syariah and Law, University Sains Islam Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24114/jg.v18i2.74429

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Prospective Teachers’ Learning, Social Studies Education, Critical Thinking, AI Literacy

Abstract

The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into higher education is transforming how prospective elementary school teachers access, interpret, and construct knowledge in Social Studies education. This study examines changes in learning patterns among prospective elementary school teachers in AI-supported Social Studies education, identifies factors associated with these changes, and explores instructional strategies used to maintain critical and reflective learning. Using a qualitative exploratory design, the study was conducted at Universitas Iskandar Muda, Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Data were collected through classroom observations, in-depth interviews with two lecturers and two prospective teachers, and document analysis. Data were analyzed interactively through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal a shift from predominantly literature-based and reflective learning toward faster, AI-assisted information seeking and knowledge production. Participants associated this transformation with technological development, digital learning culture, academic workload, limited academic literacy, generational characteristics, and lecturers’ pedagogical practices. Although AI was perceived to improve the efficiency of information retrieval and broaden access to learning resources, participants also expressed concerns about reduced critical reflection, weaker social argumentation, and less intensive academic interaction when AI was used uncritically. In response, lecturers employed problem-based, inquiry-based, reflective, and collaborative learning, supported by AI literacy development, to encourage verification, interpretation, and critical engagement with AI-generated information. These findings highlight the importance of pedagogically guided AI integration in developing adaptive, critical, reflective, and human-centered Social Studies education.

References

Adams, P. (2006). Exploring social constructivism: Theories and practicalities. Education 3-13, 34(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270600898893

Alexandrowicz, V. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Integration in Teacher Education: Navigating Benefits, Challenges, and Transformative Pedagogy. Journal of Education and Learning, 13(6), 346. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v13n6p346

Azkia, N., Martines, & Ruslaini. (2024). Pengaruh Model Discovery Learning Terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis. Jurnal Serambi Ilmu Journal of Scientific Information and Educational Crativity, 25(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.32672/jsi.v25i1.1196

Boulay, B. du. (2016). Artificial Intelligence as an Effective Classroom Assistant. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 31(6), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2016.93

Bu, Q. (2022). Ethical Risks in Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Education and Potential Countermeasures. Science Insights, 41(1), 561–566. https://doi.org/10.15354/si.22.re067

Couto, F., & Martins, R. (2025). Generative AI in Teacher Training: A Study of Pre-Service Teachers’ Engagement and Perspectives. RTIC - Revista de Tecnologias, Informação e Comunicação, 5(1), 36293. https://doi.org/10.55267/rtic/16713

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Daukšienė, E., & Mačianskienė, N. (2025). How AI Changes Teaching: Digital Competences, Didactical Characteristics, and Responsible Use. Ubiquity Proceedings, 19. https://doi.org/10.5334/uproc.187

Dilmi, C., & Sakri, Z. (2024). Artificial Intelligence’s Impact on Higher Education Quality. Science and Knowledge Horizons Journal, 4(01), 606–623. https://doi.org/10.34118/jskp.v4i01.3889

Din, A. M. G. E. (2025). Enhancing Teacher Preparation Programs Through Integration of Artificial Intelligence. In Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics Book Series (pp. 31–52). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7332-3.ch003

Galván, A. (2022). Digital Educational Technologies: Market Ends or Means at the Service of Critical Learning? Ensayos Pedagógicos, 17(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.15359/rep.17-1.1.eng

Gao, X. (2015). Promoting Experiential Learning in Pre-Service Teacher Education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 41(4), 435–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2015.1080424

Hagler, B. (2017). Best Practices for Authentic Assessments in Learner-Centered Classrooms (pp. 257–273). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0892-2.CH014

Hausfather, S. J. (1996). Vygotsky and Schooling: Creating a Social Context for Learning. Action in Teacher Education, 18(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.1996.10462828

Ihsan, M. B. (2026). International Bulletin on Interdisciplinary Studies Literasi Digital dan Berpikir Kritis dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia : Menjawab Tantangan Era Disrupsi Informasi. Konsel: International Bulletin on Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(10).

Kaur, T. (2017). Impact of Technology on Student’s Way of Perceiving Information. Educational Quest: An International Journal of Education and Applied Social Sciences, 8, 263–268. https://doi.org/10.5958/2230-7311.2017.00062.9

Kharis, S. A. A., & Indriyani, A. (2024). Analyzing Social and Psychological Impacts: Shifting Student Interaction from Teachers to ChatGPT in the Learning Process. Edukatif, 6(5), 5500–5507. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v6i5.7109

Kitchener, R. F. (1996). The Nature of the Social for Piaget and Vygotsky. Human Development, 39(5), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1159/000278474

Kudo, H., & Mori, K. (2015). A preliminary study of increasing self-efficacy in junior high school students: induced success and a vicarious experience. Psychological Reports, 117(2), 631–642. https://doi.org/10.2466/11.07.PR0.117C22Z4

Lin, Y., Long, Y., & Zhou, L. (2023). The Impact of ChatGPT on University Teacher-Student Interactions. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/24/20230703

Luo, Y. (2024). A Re-examination of the Value of Educational Technology. Science Insights, 45(5), 1649–1653. https://doi.org/10.15354/si.24.re1105

Magrill, J., & Magrill, B. (2024). Preparing Educators and Students at Higher Education Institutions for an AI-Driven World. Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 12. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.12.16

Meylani, R. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in the Education of Teachers: A Qualitative Synthesis of the Cutting-Edge Research Literature. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 12(24), 600–637. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1477709

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mohedo, M. T. D., & Bújez, A. V. (2014). Project Based Teaching as a Didactic Strategy for the Learning and Development of Basic Competences in Future Teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 232–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.05.040

Nawangsari, N. S., Pujiastuti, P., & Gularso, D. (2022). The effect of project-based learning model on PGSD students’ critical thinking skill. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 10(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v10i1.41565

Octaberlina, L. R., Muslimin, A. I., Chamidah, D., Surur, M., & Mustikawan, A. (2024). Exploring the impact of AI threats on originality and critical thinking in academic writing. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(6), 8805–8814. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i6.3878

Partyko, N. V, Smyrnova, I. M., & Zhytomyrska, T. M. (2024). Academic integrity in the era of artificial intelligence: challenges and opportunities for students. Innovatsiina Pedahohika, 72, 265–268. https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-6085/2024/72.53

Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41039-017-0062-8

Putri, S. P. D. A. W. M., Siregar, P. D., Andini, A., Novia, N. Y., Hasibuan, S. M., & Yusnaldi, E. (2024). Membangun Kesadaran Sosial Melalui Pembelajaran IPS yang Interaktif. Education Achievement: Journal of Science and Research, 5(3), 1325–1334. https://doi.org/10.51178/jsr.v5i3.2220

Rahma, I. D., Rahmadania, R., Ningrum, T. R. S., Edwar, Y., Oktara, Y. R., Hidayat, T., & Rifa’i, R. (2025). Transformasi Peran Guru di Era Kecerdasan Buatan: Dari Pengajar Menjadi Fasilitator Digital. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 4(2), 6198–6203. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i2.1566

Ruslaini, Mukhlis, A., & Yus, A. (2023). Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif Ditinjau dari Filsafat Konstruktivisme pada Pendidikan Dasar. Guree: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 1(2), 56–62. https://ejournal.unida-aceh.ac.id/guree/article/view/660

Ruys, I., Van Keer, H., & Aelterman, A. (2010). Collaborative learning in pre-service teacher education: an exploratory study on related conceptions, self-efficacy and implementation. Educational Studies, 36(5), 537–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055691003729021

Scott-Herring, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a detailed examination. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 21(1), 20240050. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2024-0050

Selmi, M., Fatma, N. el H. B., & Chedly, M. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Literature Review. La Tunisie Médicale, 103(8). https://doi.org/10.62438/tunismed.v103i8.5581

Shotter, J. (1993). Vygotsky: The social negotiation of semiotic mediation. New Ideas in Psychology, 11(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-118X(93)90020-E

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (2nd ed). Alfabeta.

Tapung, M. (2024). Fostering Multicultural Resilience: Social Science Education and Professional Development in Indonesia’s Digital Era. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(3), 502–514. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.803037

Thararattanasuwan, K., & Prachagool, V. (2024). Exploring Perspectives of Teacher Students Toward Generative AI Technologies. International Education Studies, 17(5), 22. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v17n5p22

Thyer, B. A., & Myers, L. L. (1998). Social learning theory: An empirically-based approach to understanding human behavior in the social environment. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 1(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1300/J137V01N01_03

Vargas-Murillo, A. R., Pari-Bedoya, I. N. M. de la A., & Guevara-Soto, F. de J. (2023). Challenges and Opportunities of AI-Assisted Learning: A Systematic Literature Review on the Impact of ChatGPT Usage in Higher Education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(7). https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.7.7

Williams, R. L. (2005). Targeting critical thinking within teacher education: The potential impact on society. The Teacher Educator, 40(3), 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730509555359

Wilson, M., Scalise, K., & Gochyyev, P. (2015). Rethinking ICT literacy: From computer skills to social network settings. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 18, 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2015.05.001

Yambal, S., & Waykar, Y. A. (2025). Future of Education Using Adaptive AI, Intelligent Systems, and Ethical Challenges. In Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design Book Series (pp. 171–202). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6527-4.ch006

Yao, P., & Hu, W. (2025). Analysis of Deep Integration Strategies between Artificial Intelligence and Higher Education. Contemporary Education and Teaching Research, 6(8), 329–335. https://doi.org/10.61360/bonicetr252018540804

Yavich, R. (2025). Will the Use of AI Undermine Students Independent Thinking? Education Sciences, 15(6), 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060669

Yeralan, S., & Laura, A. (2023). Generative AI: challenges to academic quality. Kazakhstan-British Technical University Bulletin, 20(3), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.55452/1998-6688-2023-20-3-17-25

Downloads

Published

2026-08-27

How to Cite

Transforming Prospective Elementary Teachers’ Social Studies Learning through Generative AI in the Digital Era. (2026). JURNAL GEOGRAFI, 18(2), 352-369. https://doi.org/10.24114/jg.v18i2.74429