Geospatial Education at the GIS–GeoAI Interface: A PRISMA-Guided Bibliometric Mapping of a Scopus Corpus, 2002–2025

Authors

  • Sony Nugratama Hijrawadi Doctoral Study Program in Geography Education, Faculty of Social Sciences Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Epon Ningrum Geographic Information Science Study Program, Faculty of Social Studies Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Nandi Nandi Geographic Information Science Study Program, Faculty of Social Studies Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Lili Somantri Geographic Information Science Study Program, Faculty of Social Studies Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24114/jg.v18i2.75596

Keywords:

Geospatial Information, Geography Education, Geographic Information Systems, Geospatial Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Geospatial information is used in education as disciplinary content and as a learning technology, while computational geospatial research increasingly employs artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, and remote sensing. This study maps the publication performance and thematic structure of a broad Scopus corpus at the interface of geospatial technology and education from 2002 to 2025. A PRISMA-guided review and bibliometric analysis were conducted on 125 documents from 68 sources using bibliometrix and Biblioshiny in R. The corpus showed an annual publication growth rate of 10.99%, an average of 11.93 citations per document, and 2.81 authors per document. The Journal of Geography was the most productive source, while De Lázaro-Torres and De Miguel González were the most productive authors. Co-word analysis identified an educational GIS cluster, a geospatial technology and learning cluster, and a computational geospatial cluster containing GeoAI-related terms. The increased visibility of the computational cluster in 2022–2025 indicates an emerging thematic orientation, not evidence that GeoAI has replaced GIS-based education or already dominates educational practice. Because the search expression included the broad term learning and the corpus retained several technical geospatial records, the findings should be interpreted as an exploratory map of the education–technology interface. The proposed instructional sequence is therefore a theory-informed research proposition that requires empirical validation

References

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Bai, L., Huang, W., Zhang, X., Du, S., Cong, G., Wang, H., & Liu, B. (2023). Geographic mapping with unsupervised multi-modal representation learning from VHR images and POIs. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 201, 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2023.05.006

Baker, T., Battersby, S., Bednarz, S., Bodzin, A., Kolvoord, B., Moore, S., Sinton, D., & Uttal, D. (2015). A Research Agenda for Geospatial Technologies and Learning. Journal of Geography, 114, 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2014.950684

Battersby, J. (2005). Differentiation in teaching and learning Geography. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994238-19

Bernhäuserová, V., Havelková, L., Hátlová, K., & Hanus, M. (2022). The Limits of GIS Implementation in Education: A Systematic Review. ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf., 11, 592. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11120592

Bondarenko, O. (2025). Teaching geography with GIS: a systematic review, 2010-2024. Science Education Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.55056/seq.903

Cox, M., Elen, J., & Steegen, A. (2019). Systems thinking in geography: Can high school students do it? International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 28(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2017.1386413

De Lázaro-Torres, M. L., De Miguel González, R., & Morales Yago, F. J. (2017). WebGIS and geospatial technologies for landscape education in personalized learning contexts. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6(11), 350. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6110350

De Miguel González, R., & De Lázaro-Torres, M. L. (2020). WebGIS implementation and effectiveness in secondary education using the Digital Atlas for Schools. Journal of Geography, 119(2), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2020.1726991

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Golledge, R. G. (2002). The nature of geographic knowledge. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(1), 1 – 14. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.00276

Gahegan, M. (2020). Fourth paradigm GIScience? Prospects for automated discovery and explanation from data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2019.1652304

Golledge, R. G., Marsh, M., & Battersby, S. E. (2008). Matching geospatial concepts with geographic educational needs. Geographical Research, 46(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00494.x

Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., & McGuinness, L. A. (2022). PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), e1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230

Humble, N. (2023). Future paths for GIS in K-12 education: A review of possibilities and constraints. European Journal of Geography. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.n.hum.14.3.079.088

Hupy, J. P. (2011). Teaching geographic concepts through fieldwork and competition. Journal of Geography, 110(3), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2011.532229

Ito, K., & Biljecki, F. (2021). Assessing bikeability with street view imagery and computer vision. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 132, 103371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103371

Konstantakatos, G., & Galani, L. (2022). How is the use of GIS in geographical and environmental education evaluated? Findings from a systematic review. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 32, 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2022.2138167

Marsh, M., Golledge, R. G., & Battersby, S. E. (2007). Geospatial concept understanding and recognition in G6 college students: A preliminary argument for minimal GIS. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(4), 696–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00578.x

Milson, A. J., & Earle, B. D. (2007). Internet-based GIS in an inductive learning environment: A case study of ninth-grade geography students. Journal of Geography, 106(6), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340701851274

Mísařová, D., Svobodová, H., Mašterová, V., & Novotná, K. (2024). Czech education system’s conditions for the implementation of GIS in the curriculum in an international context. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 33, 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2023.2299602

Nielsen, C. P., Oberle, A., & Sugumaran, R. (2011). Implementing a high school-level geospatial technologies and spatial thinking course. Journal of Geography, 110(2), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2011.534171

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Reynard, D., & Shirgaokar, M. (2019). Harnessing the power of machine learning: Can Twitter data be useful in guiding resource allocation decisions during a natural disaster? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 77, 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.03.002

Saipiatuddin, R., Anggrahita, H., & Dimyati, M. (2026). Digital Twins and Urban Heat Island Modeling: A Systematic Review of Conceptual, Technical, and Geospatial Gaps in Next-Generation Urban Climate Systems. JURNAL GEOGRAFI, 18(1), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.24114/jg.v18i1.71340

Sajjad, M. (2021). Disaster resilience in Pakistan: A comprehensive multi-dimensional spatial profiling. Applied Geography, 126, 102367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102367

Shakhislam, L., Yerlan, I., Duman, A., Ussenov, N., Zhu, K., & Dávid, L. (2024). Opportunities and challenges of using geospatial technologies in teaching school geography in Kazakhstan. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 34, 428–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2024.2380173

Tomlinson, R. F. (2013). Thinking about GIS: Geographic Information System Planning for Managers (Fifth edition). Esri Press.

Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Downloads

Published

2026-10-06

How to Cite

Geospatial Education at the GIS–GeoAI Interface: A PRISMA-Guided Bibliometric Mapping of a Scopus Corpus, 2002–2025. (2026). JURNAL GEOGRAFI, 18(2), 497-514. https://doi.org/10.24114/jg.v18i2.75596