TINGKAT KESULITAN, DAYA BEDA, DAN RELIABILITAS TES IPAS KELAS 5 SEMESTER GANJIL
Abstract
This research aims to: (1) explain the item difficulty of the odd semester class 5 science test items, (2) explain the item Discrimination of odd semester class 5 test items, (3) determine the reliability of the odd semester class 5 test. The IPAS test consists of 10 questions and was tested on 188 respondents. The data analysis technique used is the item program version 3.00. The results of the analysis show: (1) The item difficulty for class 5 odd semester ranges from 0.23 to 0.64. The level of difficulty of the most difficult item is item 10 and the level of difficulty of the easiest item is item 5. The ratio of the percentage of medium items: difficult items is 90%:10%, (2) Differentiation of grade 5 science test items for odd and even semesters ranges from 0.30 to 0.55. The lowest differentiating power is item 1 and the highest differentiating power is item 7. There are 0 items that have a bad difference. There are only 5 items that have different power. There are 5 items that have good item differentiation. There are 0 items that have very good item differentiation, (3) The reliability of the odd semester 5th grade science test is 0.9.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Djemari Mardapi. (2000). Komparasi metode penyetaraan tes menurut teori respons butir. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan 2 (3).
Djemari Mardapi. (2002). Bukti kesahihan dan keandalan alat ukur: tanggapan atas artikel “Tes keterampilan olah raga judo bagi mahasiswa“. Jurnal Kependidikan. No.1 tahun XXXII. Lembaga Penelitian UNY.
Djemari Mardapi. (2004). Penyusunan tes hasil belajar. Yogyakarta: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Setyaedhi, Hari Sugiharto, A. Ardianik, dan M. Hanif. Perbandingan Uji Reliabilitas Nilai Ujian Akhir Semester Mata Kuliah Media Grafis Dengan Menggunakan Berbagai Metode Uji Reliabilitas. Konferensi Bersama Internasional Seni dan Humaniora 2023 (IJCAH 2023) . Atlantis Pers, 2023.
S. Eko Putro Widoyoko (2012). Evaluasi program pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sa'diah, BK (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Pada Materi Lingkaran Kelas VIII di MTsN 2 Kota Kediri (Disertasi Doktor, IAIN Kediri).
Suwarto. (2013). Pengembangan tes diagnostik dalam pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Suwarto. (2016). Karakteristik tes Biologi kelas 7 semester gasal. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora 17 (1), 1-8.
Suwarto. (2017). Tingkat Kesulitan, Daya Beda, dan Reliabilitas Tes biologi Kelas 7 Semester Genap. Seminar Nasional MIPA 2016, Unnes 5 Nopember 2016.
Uno, H.B., Sofyan, H., & Candiasa, I.M. (2001). Pengembangan instrume untuk penelitian. Jakarta: Delima Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/sejpgsd.v14i2.58358
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 68 timesPDF - 41 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
School Education Journal PGSD FIP UNIMED
School Education Journal PGSD FIP UNIMED is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.