Publication Ethic
Publication Ethics
Jurnal Psikologi Konseling upholds the highest standards of integrity in the peer review process. Authors are expected to maintain honesty and ethical conduct in all aspects of their research and publication, including data collection, analysis, reporting, and authorship. Acts such as data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, unethical research practices, and failure to obtain proper consent from research participants are considered serious violations.
Ethical Guidelines
Authors are required to adhere to the following ethical principles:
Authors must ensure that their manuscript is an original work that does not infringe on the intellectual property rights of others.
Authors must not plagiarize or reproduce any published content without proper citation or permission.
All listed authors must take full responsibility for the content of the submitted or published manuscript.
Manuscripts must be submitted exclusively to Jurnal Psikologi Konseling and should not be under review by any other publication.
Authors are prohibited from submitting previously published work or manuscripts that substantially overlap with published materials.
Authors must avoid any form of defamatory or offensive statements that could harm the reputation of individuals or institutions.
Jurnal Psikologi Konseling regards plagiarism as a serious ethical breach and is committed to preventing it through thorough editorial and review checks.
Reviewer Ethics
Reviewers are expected to follow these ethical standards when reviewing manuscripts for Jurnal Psikologi Konseling.
Reviewers must avoid any form of bias related to race, religion, nationality, gender, seniority, or institutional affiliation of the authors.
Reviewers must treat the reviewed manuscript as a confidential document and must not share or discuss its contents outside the review process.
Reviewers should provide objective, constructive, and clear feedback that helps authors improve the quality of their work.
Editorial Team Ethics
All editorial board members are expected to uphold the following ethical standards.
Editorial members must evaluate manuscripts solely on academic merit without bias or discrimination of any kind.
The editorial team must maintain confidentiality regarding all manuscripts under review and may not disclose or discuss their contents outside the review process.
Editors must ensure that all manuscripts are handled efficiently and within a reasonable timeframe.
Data, analyses, or ideas contained in submitted manuscripts must not be used for personal research purposes without the explicit consent of the authors.
