1.png)
Hubungan Antara Keterlibatan Mengikuti Kegiatan Ekstrakurikuler Dengan Psychological Well-Being Mahasiswa Emerging Adulthood Universitas X di Surabaya
Abstract
Psychological Well-Being adalah suatu kemampuan individu merealisasikan serta mengoptimalkan dirinya dengan cara menerima diri seutuhnya, memilki kemandirian dan tidak terpengaruh dari tekanan luar, mampu mengontrol lingkungan di sekitarnya, mampu membangun relasi sosial, memiliki tujuan hidup yang jelas, serta dapat merealisasikan potensi dirinya secara kontinyu. Salah satu faktor yang memengaruhi psychological well-being mahasiswa ialah keterlibatan mengikuti ekstrakurikuler. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji hubungan antara keterlibatan mengikuti ekstrakurikuler dengan pscyhological well-being. Pengambil sampel dilakukan dengan menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Subjek penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya sebanyak 192 mahasiswa (131 perempuan dan 61 laki-laki). Teknik analisis yang digunakan ialah uji hipotesis dengan Pearson. Berdasarkan hasil uji korelasi Pearson menunjukkan adanya korelasi siginifikan positif antara keterlibatan mengikuti ekstrakurikuler dengan psychlogical well-being (r = 0.154, p = 0.033). Sumbangan efektif yang diberikan keterlibatan mengikuti ekstrakurikuler dengan psychological well-being ialah sebesar 2%. Keterlibatan mengikuti ekstrakurikuler berkorelasi dengan aspek psychological well-being yakni aspek personal growth (r = 0.177, p = 0.014) dan aspek positive realtion with others (r = 0.0215, p = 0.003).
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging Adulthood: A Theory of Development From the Late Teens Through the Twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469-480.
Azwar, S. (2014). Reabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Bartkus, K. R., Nemelka, B., Nemelka, M., & Gardner, P. (2012). Clarifying The Meaning Of Extracurricular Activity: A Literature Review Of Definitions. American Journal of Business Education, 5(6), 693-704. Retrieved September 27, 2017, from www.cluteinstitute.com
Bierman Alex, Fazio Elena M, & Milkie Melissa A. (2006). A Multifaceted Approach to the Mental Health Advantage of the Married: Assessing How Explanations Vary by Outcome Measure and Unmarried Group. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 554–582.
Universitas Surabaya. Pedoman Mahasiswa 2016-2017.
Eccles, J. S., Barber, B. L., Stone, M. and Hunt, J. (2003), Extracurricular Activities and Adolescent Development. Journal of Social Issues, 59: 865–889.
Bohnert, A., Fredricks, J., & Randall, E. (2010). Capturing Unique Dimensions of Youth Organized Activity Involvement. Theoretical and Methodological Considerations, 80(4), 576-610. doi:DOI: 10.3102/0034654310364533.
Busseri, M. A., Rose-Krasnor, L., Willoughby, T., Chalmers, H. (2006). A longitudinal examination of breadth and intensity of youth activity involvement and successful development. Development Psychology, 42(6):1313-26.
Christie, H., Tett, L., Cree, V. E., Hounsell, J., & McCune, V. (2008). 'A real rollercoaster of confidence and emotions: learning to be a university student. Studies In Higher Education, 33(5), 567-581.
Eccles, J. S., & Gootman, J. A. (2002). Community Programs to Promote Youth Development. Washinngton DC: National Academy Press.
Eddington, N., & Shuman, R. (2005). Subjective Well-Being (Happiness). Continuing Psychology Education.
Foubert, J. D., & Grainger, L. U. (2006). Effects of Involvement in Clubs and Organizations on the Psychosocial Development of First-Year and Senior College Students. NASPA Journal, 43(1), 166-182.
Gardner, M., Rot, J., & Gunn, J. B. (2008). Adolescents's participation in organized activities and developmental success 2 and 8 years after high school: Do Sponshorship, duration, and intensity matter? Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 814-830.
Gaunt, R., Leyens, J. Ph., & Demoulin, S. (2002). Intergroup relations and the attribution of emotions : Control over memory for secondary emotions associated with ingroup or ougroup. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 508-514.
Gilman, R., Meyers, J., & Perez, L. (2004). Structured Extracurricular Activities Among Adolescents: Findings and Implications For School Psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 41(1), 31-41.
Guzman, Maria D., "The Effects of Organized Activity Involvement on Latino Adolescent Well-Being" (2013). Dissertations. 669.
Guzmanrocha, M. D., Mcleod, D. L., & Bohnert, A. M. (2017). Dimension of Organized Activity Involvemnet Among Latino Youth: Impact 0n Well-Being. Journal of Adolescence, 60, 130-139.
Hansen, D. M., Larson, R. W., & Dworkin, J. B. (2003). What adolescents learn in organized youth activities: A survey of self-reported developmental experiences. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 25–55.
Katz, M. H. (2011). Multivariable analysis: a practical guide for clinicians and public health researchers. Cambridge university press.
Keyes, C. L., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007-1022.
Larson, R. W., & Varma, S. (1999). How children and adolescents spend time across the world: Work, play, and developmental opportunities. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 701–736.
Ludban, M., & Gitimu, P. N. (2015). Psychological Well-Being of College Students. Undergraduate Research Journal for the Human Sciences, 14.
Mahoney, J. L., Larson, R. W., & Eccles, J. S. (2005). Organized Activities as Contexts of Development: Extracurricular Activities, After-School and Community Programs. Mahwah, 65-83.
Marmot, M. G., Fuhrer, R., Ettner, S. L., M. N., Bumpass, L. L., & Ryff, C. D. (1998). Contribution of psychosocial factors to socioeconomic differences in health. Mibank Quarterly, 76, 403-448. doi:doi:10.1111/1468-0009.00097
Oosterhoff, B., Kaplow, J. B., Wray-Lake, L., & Gallagher, K. (2017). Activity-specific Pathways Among Duration of Organized Activity Involvement, Social Support, and Adolescent Well-Being: Findings from A Nationally Representative Sample. Journal of Adolescence, 60, 83-93.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness Is Everything, or Is It? Explorations on the Meaning of Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081.
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, M.L.C. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727.
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know Thyself and Become What You Are: A Eudaimonic Approach to Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 13-39.
Sihombing, A. F. (2017). Hubungan antara Dukungan Keluarga dengan Psychological Well-Being Pada Penderita Diabetes Mellitus Tipe 2. Skripsi. Universitas Surabaya.
Schmutte, P., & Ryff, C. D. (1997). Personality and well-being: reexamining methods and meanings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 549-559. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.549.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode penelitian kombinasi (mixed methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/konseling.v19i2.30440
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 226 timesPDF - 185 times
Copyright (c) 2021 Natasha Gandhi, Nurlita Indah Karunia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.