Peer Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to this journal undergo a double-blind peer review process to ensure academic quality and integrity.

Each submission is initially evaluated by the Editor to assess its suitability with the journal’s scope and compliance with author guidelines. Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent to at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field.

Reviewers assess the manuscript based on originality, methodological soundness, relevance, clarity, and contribution to the field. Based on the reviewers’ recommendations, the Editor makes one of the following decisions: accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject.

Authors are required to revise their manuscripts in accordance with reviewers’ comments before final acceptance. The final decision rests with the Editor-in-Chief.