.png)
Scientific, inquiry, and animation integration: The IPSIA learning model in chemistry
Abstract
This study addresses the issue of low active participation among students in chemistry learning, as well as their difficulties in understanding macroscopic, microscopic, and symbolic concepts, which contribute to unsatisfactory learning outcomes. To tackle these challenges and enhance students' performance in chemistry, a valid, practical, and effective IPSIA learning model was developed. The research employed a development approach based on the ADDIE (Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, and Evaluate) model, beginning with a thorough analysis of the curriculum. This was followed by the design of the IPSIA model, which was validated using a questionnaire instrument. The results of the validity test scored 98, categorizing it as "very good." Additionally, the practical test of the IPSIA model also received a score of 98, indicating that it is user-friendly. During the implementation phase, the effectiveness of the model was assessed through test results. The improvement in students' chemistry learning was evidenced by normalized gain scores: 0.57 for the control class and 0.72 for the experimental class at Senior High School (SMA) 2 Padangsidimpuan, as well as 0.52 for the control class and 0.64 for the experimental class at SMA 5 Padangsidimpuan. These findings demonstrate that the IPSIA learning model is valid, practical, and effective in improving students' chemistry learning outcomes.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adauyah, R., & Aznam, N. (2024). Guided Inquiry Learning Model in Chemistry Education: A Systematic Review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(3), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i3.6373
Akben, N. (2020). Effects of the problem-posing approach on students' problem solving skills and metacognitive awareness in science education. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 1143-1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9726-7
Branch, R. M. (2009). Design. Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach, 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6_3
Burgess, A. B. (2023). Evaluating the Impact of Personalized Professional Learning on Technology Integration in the Classroom. Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina.
Cahyadi, A., Widyastuti, S., & Mufidah, V. N. (2021). Emergency remote teaching evaluation of the higher education in Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07788
Cahyani, L., Muhammad, I., Ugli, A. A. A., Aruna, A., & Surahmi, M. (2023). Digital Transformation in Education: A Bibliometric Review of E-Learning Trends and Challenges. Journal of Technology Global, 1(01), 54-63.
Chen, J., Wang, M., Dede, C., & Grotzer, T. A. (2021). Molecular visualizations for chemistry education: The role of multidimensional animations in conceptual understanding. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(5), 1619-1627. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00009.
Cooper, M. M., & Stowe, R. L. (2018). Chemistry education research—From personal empiricism to evidence, theory, and informed practice. Chemical Reviews, 118(12), 6053-6087. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00020
Duran, M., & Dökme, I. (2016). The effect of the inquiry-based learning approach on student's critical-thinking skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02311a
Fadillah, A., Nopitasari, D., & Pradja, B. P. (2020). Blended learning model during the covid-19 pandemic: analysis of student’s' mathematical disposition. JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika), 4(2), 173-181. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v4i2.2582
Febriani, N., Adhe, K. R., Widayanti, M. D., & Maulidiyah, E. C. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri dengan Media Realia Terhadap Literasi Sains Anak Usia 4-5 Tahun. JIEEC (Journal of Islamic Education for Early Childhood), 5(2), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.30587/jieec.v5i2.5801
Ferreira, C., Baptista, M., & Arroio, A. (2019). Visual tools in teaching and learning chemistry: A review. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 20(4), 788-804. http://dx.doi.org/10.33225/pec/11.37.48
Hwang, G. J., Wang, S. Y., & Lai, C. L. (2020). Effects of a social regulation-based online learning framework on students' learning achievements and behaviors in mathematics. Computers & Education, 160, 104031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104031
Jiang, X., Stockwell, B.R. & Conrad, M. Ferroptosis: mechanisms, biology and role in disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 22, 266–282 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-020-00324-8
Kadıoğlu-Akbulut, C., Çetin-Dindar, A., Küçük, S. et al. Development and Validation of the ICT-TPACK-Science Scale. J Sci Educ Technol, 29, 355–368 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09821-z
Kumar, A., Kumar, P., Palvia, S. C. J., & Verma, S. (2019). Online education worldwide: Current status and emerging trends. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 21(1), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2017.1294867
Koponen, I. T., & Nousiainen, M. (2018). Concept networks of students’ knowledge of relationships between physics concepts: Finding key concepts and their epistemic support. Appl Netw Sci, 3, 14 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-018-0072-5
Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1259-1268. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1514215
Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., Romero-Rodríguez, J. M., López-Belmonte, J., & Alonso-García, S. (2020). Flipped learning approach as educational innovation in water literacy. Water, 12(2), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020574
Nisa, M., Shah, J. H., Kanwal, S., Raza, M., Khan, M. A., Damaševičius, R., & Blažauskas, T. (2020). Hybrid Malware Classification Method Using Segmentation-Based Fractal Texture Analysis and Deep Convolution Neural Network Features. Applied Sciences, 10(14), 4966. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10144966
Purnama, Y. (2021). Teacher’s Obstacles in English Online Learning during Covid-19 Pandemic. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 5(2), 228. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v5i2.3618
Purwandari, I. D., Rahayu, S., & Dasna, I. W. (2022). Inquiry Learning Model in Chemistry Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 23(2), 681–691. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v23i2.pp681-691
Peng, R., Abdul Razak, R., & Hajar Halili, S. (2023). Factors influencing in-service teachers’ technology integration model: Innovative strategies for educational technology. PLOS ONE, 18(8), e0286112. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286112
Plomp, T. (2013). Educational design research: An introduction. Educational Design Research, 11-50.
Rahmatollahi, M., & Mohamadi Zenouzagh, Z. (2021). Designing and validating an evaluation inventory for assessing teachers’ professional accountability. Lang Test Asia, 11, 11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00128-3
Ramadhan, T. M. H., Halim, A., Mustanir, M., Huda, I., Evendi, E., Saleh, F., Sofyan, F., Yusrizal, Y., & Safrida, S. (2023). Development of Science’s e-Module Based on Qur’an Integration-interconnection and Spiritual Intelligence (QISI) for Solar System Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 3744–3751. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.3478
Sari, A. I., Suryani, N., Rochsantiningsih, D., & Suharno. (2019). The development of Android-based smartphone learning application on teaching reading comprehension. The 2nd International Conference on Science, Mathematics, Environment, and Education, 2194, 020112. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139844
Samadun, S., Setiani, R., Dwikoranto, D., & Marsini, M. (2023). Effectiveness of Inquiry Learning Models to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Ability. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(2), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i2.277
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Sjöström, J., Eilks, I., & Talanquer, V. (2020). Didaktik Models in Chemistry Education. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(4), 910–915. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b01034
Suryati, S., Adnyana, P. B., Ariawan, I. P., & Wesnawa, I. G. A. (2024). Integrating Constructivist and Inquiry Based Learning in Chemistry Education: A Systematic Review. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 12(5), 1166-1188.
Suyatman, S., Saputro, S., Sunarno, W., & Sukarmin, S. (2021). Profile of Student Analytical Thinking Skills in the Natural Sciences by Implementing Problem-Based Learning Model. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), 23. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2021-023-suya
Wulandari, S. H., Fatah, A. H., & Anggraeni, M. E. (2019). Analisis Materi Ajar Kimia SMA/MA Kelas XII Pada Konsep Sifat Koligatif Larutan. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang, 10(2), 300-320. https://doi.org/10.37304/jikt.v10i2.39
Zulkarnain, Z., Darmayanti, N. W. S., Utami, L. S., Sabaryati, J., & Isnaini, M. (2024). Development of a 2-D Motion Tracker Application Project Assisted By Computer Vision to Enhance Student’s Laboratory Skills. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i1.4736
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v16i3.63566
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 61 timesPDF - 11 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Rabiyatul Adawiyah Siregar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia
Contact: +62 853-1769-2813
Email: jpkim.pps@unimed.ac.id
Jl. Willem Iskandar, Pasar V, Medan Estate, Medan City, North Sumatra Province, Postal Code 20221. Phone/fax: (061) 661 3365 / +62 852-7802-1981.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.