Indonesia Sport Journal is committed to maintaining the accuracy, transparency, and integrity of the scholarly record. The journal recognizes that errors or ethical concerns may occasionally be identified in submitted or published manuscripts. This policy establishes the procedures for correcting, withdrawing, or retracting articles when necessary.
All decisions regarding corrections and retractions are made objectively by the Editor-in-Chief in consultation with the editorial team and other relevant parties, where appropriate. The journal follows recognized publication ethics principles, including guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Corrections may be issued when errors are identified in a published article but do not invalidate the overall findings or conclusions of the research.
Corrections may include, but are not limited to:
Errors in author names, affiliations, or publication metadata.
Typographical, formatting, or editorial errors that affect the accuracy or clarity of the article.
Errors in tables, figures, references, or other content that can be corrected without compromising the overall validity of the research.
Omission of relevant acknowledgments, funding information, or other required disclosures.
Correction requests may be submitted by authors, readers, editors, or other relevant parties. Requests must include a clear description of the error and supporting evidence.
The editorial team will evaluate the nature and significance of the error and determine whether a correction is appropriate. If approved, the journal will publish a formal correction notice linked to the original article. The notice will identify the correction and explain its nature.
The journal will maintain an appropriate record of the correction to ensure transparency and preserve the integrity of the scholarly record.
Retraction may be considered when serious problems undermine the reliability, validity, or ethical integrity of a published article.
Grounds for retraction may include:
Clear evidence that the research findings are unreliable because of serious errors, data fabrication, or data falsification.
Confirmed plagiarism or substantial unattributed duplication of previously published work.
Duplicate or redundant publication without appropriate justification or disclosure.
Serious violations of research ethics, including the absence of required ethical approval or consent where applicable.
Manipulation or compromise of the peer-review process.
Unauthorized use of data, images, or other materials that materially affects the legitimacy of the publication.
Undisclosed conflicts of interest that substantially affect the interpretation or reliability of the findings.
Other serious violations of publication ethics that undermine confidence in the article.
Retraction is intended to correct the scholarly record and inform readers that the findings or conclusions of an article should no longer be relied upon in whole or in part. It is not intended primarily as a punishment for authors.
When a potential reason for retraction is identified, the journal will follow these procedures:
Initial Assessment: The Editor-in-Chief or a designated editor evaluates the allegation and available evidence.
Communication with Authors: The corresponding author and, where appropriate, other affected authors are contacted and given an opportunity to respond.
Evidence Evaluation: The editorial team assesses the evidence, requests additional documentation when necessary, and may consult independent experts or relevant institutions.
Editorial Decision: The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision after considering the available evidence, the authors' responses, and applicable publication ethics guidance.
Publication of Retraction Notice: If retraction is approved, the journal publishes a formal notice explaining the reasons for the decision and identifying the affected article.
Article Identification: The article's online record is clearly marked as retracted, and the retraction notice is linked to the original publication.
The journal aims to handle retraction cases promptly while ensuring that decisions are based on reliable evidence and fair procedures.
If serious concerns arise regarding the reliability or ethical integrity of a published article but the available evidence is inconclusive, the journal may publish an Expression of Concern.
An Expression of Concern informs readers that an issue is under investigation or that the reliability of the article remains uncertain. It may be followed by a correction, retraction, or other appropriate editorial action when sufficient information becomes available.
Withdrawal applies primarily to manuscripts that have not yet been formally published as the final version of record.
Authors requesting withdrawal must submit a written request to the editorial office, explain the reasons, and obtain the agreement of all co-authors where applicable. The editor will evaluate the request and determine whether withdrawal is justified.
Withdrawal may be considered in circumstances such as accidental duplicate submission, a substantial error identified before publication, or a legitimate authorship or ethical concern.
A manuscript cannot be withdrawn merely to avoid an unfavorable editorial decision or to facilitate simultaneous submission to another journal. Where suspected misconduct exists, the journal may suspend the withdrawal process while the matter is investigated.
Once an article has been formally published, it is handled under the correction, Expression of Concern, or retraction procedures rather than the pre-publication withdrawal process.
A retraction notice will:
Clearly identify the title and authors of the affected article.
State that the article has been retracted.
Explain the reasons and basis for the retraction.
Identify the party or parties responsible for issuing the notice.
Distinguish, where possible, between honest error and research or publication misconduct.
Provide a direct link to the original article and remain freely accessible to readers.
Retracted articles will generally remain available in the journal's archive to preserve the scholarly record, but they will be clearly labeled as retracted. The journal will not silently remove a formally published article merely because it has been retracted, except where removal is required by law or necessary to address exceptional legal or safety concerns.
Authors are required to notify the journal promptly when they discover significant errors in their published work and to cooperate with the editorial team in investigating and correcting the record.
Editors are responsible for evaluating correction and retraction requests impartially, maintaining confidentiality where appropriate, documenting relevant decisions, and ensuring that the published scholarly record is corrected when necessary.
All parties are expected to cooperate in good faith and provide accurate information throughout the process.
The Editor-in-Chief has final editorial authority over the publication of corrections, Expressions of Concern, and retraction notices, subject to applicable journal policies and publication ethics principles.
Indonesia Sport Journal is committed to handling all such matters transparently, fairly, and consistently to protect readers, authors, research participants, and the integrity of scientific communication.
TOOLS
Indeks similarity 25% maximum
(exclude quote & bibliography)
Indonesia Sport Jurnal
Program Studi Pendidikan OlahragaProgram Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Medan
Website : https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/jpor
Jurnal Indonesia Sport Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
