ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY OF MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS IN RELIGION AND MORAL EDUCATION FOR THIRD GRADE STUDENTS AT ADVENT NABIRE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL USING ITEMEN

Authors

  • Efa Nurlinda Purba Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta
  • Hermenius Sujati Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24114/jmpsd.v2i6.67348

Keywords:

Question Item Quality, Multiple Choice, Religion and Ethics, ITEMEN

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the quality of 20 multiple-choice questions in the second semester exam for the Religion and Ethics subject for third-grade students at SD Advent Nabire using the ITEMEN program. The analysis focused on the level of difficulty, discriminating power, and effectiveness of distractors. The results show that 65% of the questions are categorized as moderate and 35% as easy, with no difficult questions, indicating a lack of variety in challenges. The majority of questions (65%) have low to very low discriminating power, indicating their inability to distinguish students based on their level of understanding. However, 85% of the distractors function effectively, indicating a good distractor design. It was concluded that, although the distractors were good, the overall quality of the questions needed significant improvement in terms of discriminating power and difficulty level distribution in order to make the evaluation instrument more valid. Recommendations included revising problematic questions, increasing teachers' capacity in question writing, and developing a high-quality question bank.

References

Arikunto, S. (2019). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.

Azwar, Saifuddin. (2016). Dasar-Dasar Psikometri. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological Testing (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Depdikbud. (1985). Petunjuk Penulisan Butir Soal Tes. Jakarta: Departemen

Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item

Response Theory. Sage Publications.

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022). Keputusan

Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia

Nomor 56/M/2022 tentang Pedoman Penerapan Kurikulum dalam Rangka

Pemulihan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan,

Riset, dan Teknologi.

Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran, Penilaian, dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Nuha Medika.

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2022). Educational Assessment of Students (8th ed.).

Pearson.

Popham, W. J. (2005). Classroom Assessment: What Teachers Need to Know (4th

ed.). Pearson Education.

Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. Parama Publishing.

Sudijono, Anas. (2011). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo

Persada.

Suharsimi. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung:

Alfabeta.

Sudijono, A. (2017). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Published

2025-10-26

How to Cite

Purba, E. N., & Hermenius Sujati. (2025). ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY OF MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS IN RELIGION AND MORAL EDUCATION FOR THIRD GRADE STUDENTS AT ADVENT NABIRE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL USING ITEMEN. Jurnal Merah Putih Sekolah Dasar, 2(6). https://doi.org/10.24114/jmpsd.v2i6.67348

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.